Repost from the Benicia Herald
[Editor: No link is provided for this letter because the Benicia Herald does not publish Letters in its online edition. – RS]
Thanks for opposing views of Valero Crude-by-Rail ProjectBy Georgia Taylor Benedict, September 1, 2015, Benicia Herald
Thank you for two thought-provoking columns in the Sunday, Aug. 30 (“Benicia: Not exactly a smart, green city,” by Grant Cooke and “Crude by rail can be solution to Benicia’s budget woes,” by Dan Broadwater). Mr. Cooke and Mr. Broadwater presented opposing view of the Valero Crude-by-Rail Project. What was obvious was that Mr. Cooke’s analysis was far more inclusive than that of Mr. Broadwater.
The most obvious point Mr. Broadwater (writing in favor of crude by rail) failed to address was the inherent and demonstrated danger to communities, waterways, wildlife and natural habitats caused for transporting highly volatile Bakken crude over thousands of miles. Trains derail, leak, and spill fuel and highly toxic crude oil with what appears to be alarming frequency.
The risk to the city of Benicia of a deadly explosion or highly polluted air if this project is approved is not a matter of if but when. To support this project because it may create 20 long-term jobs is laughable.
I sincerely hope that our elected city officials will deny Valero’s proposal after due consideration. To fail to do so could be catastrophic for our lovely town.