Benicia is doing its best to close the at least $7.5 million annual resource gap left by the Valero Refinery closing. It’s doing so through budget cuts, operational reorganization and selective revenue generation. In addition, state housing mandates, the conversion of the Refinery property, inflation and emerging challenges (such as rising water levels due to climate change) will stretch police, fire, recreation, infrastructure and other city services.
Which is all a way of saying: Benicia needs additional annual revenues.Ballot Measures X, Y and Z, which we’re voting on this November 3 (or even sooner, if you wish), provide a way of raising such badly needed funds at no cost to most of us.
For a solid, relatively comprehensive explanation of why these measures are necessary, please go to the Building Benicia’s Future site, at beniciasfuture.org. In the meantime, I’ll take a shorter stab at that here.
The point of these items is not only about the present. It’s mainly to pave the way for the future: for Benicia’s kids, grandkids and families to live in a surviving, thriving city, as fine as or even better than what we have now.
Here’s how these measures will help if passed, starting with the most significant one…
Measure Z: A Reasonable Real Property Transfer Tax
Measure Z proposes a real property transfer tax for residential, commercial and industrial sites. THE MEASURE Z TRANSFER TAX APPLIES TO ALMOST NO EXISTING HOMES AND RESIDENTS.NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, THERE WILL BE NO TRANSFER TAX ON ANY CURRENTLY EXISTING HOME UNDER MEASURE Z IF THE HOME IS SOLD FOR UNDER $2 MILLION. THE TAX ALSO DOES NOT APPLY TO SALES OR OTHER TRANSFERS WITHIN FAMILIES, including between parents and children, grandparents and grandchildren, siblings, spouses and domestic partners. Certain affordable housing is also exempted.
So, what does Measure Z apply to? Well, for instance, if Measure Z were already in place late last year, Benicia would have pocketed a tax of $1,160,000 when commercial developers Blue Rise Ventures and DRA Advisors paid $145 million for a dozen buildings covering about 15 percent of Benicia’s industrial park. With the possibility that these or other investors could buy other parts of that area, such sales could benefit the city’s coffers considerably in the future if Measure Z is approved.
What’s more, in coming years much or all of the 900-acre Valero refinery site will be sold for industrial, commercial and housing development purposes, at a conceivable cumulative (though admittedly speculative) cost of $1 billion or more. That would mean many millions of dollars for the city. It’s noteworthy that Signature Development Group, the firm commissioned by Valero to sell the property, does not object to Measure Z (or associated Measure Y – more on that below).
Putting aside these huge projects, where does a typical Benician simply selling a private home figure in all this? Almost all of us are off the hook for any transfer tax. As I’ve emphasized, unless you sell a currently existing home for $2 million or more, you never pay the tax on that existing home.
In addition to commercial and industrial properties, the tax mainly applies to new houses built in 2027 or later. That is, if you or a developer sells a house that is built in 2027 or later, the tax is $4, $6 or $8 per $1,000, depending on whether the price is under $2,000,000, from $2,000,000 to $9,999,999, or $10,000,000 or more.
Thus, with several thousand houses due to be built in Benicia in coming years, the transfer taxes from residential sales would nicely complement the transfer taxes on commercial and industrial transfers.
Measure Y: A Necessary, Limited Charter City Status
Measure Y is the necessary companion to Measure Z. It allows Benicia to become a “limited Charter City,” which means a change in its legal status only for the purpose of increasing its real property transfer tax. Due to state law, that tax is currently capped at $0.55 per $1,000. We can’t increase that figure from $0.55 to the proposed $4-8 per $1,000 proposed under Measure Z unless Measure Y also passes and Benicia thus becomes a limited Charter City. Hence the necessity of voting “Yes” for both proposed measures.
The Opposition: Some Questionable Claims
Certain folks oppose Measures Y and Z. Perhaps you’ve noticed their signs in selected places around town. I’m sure they are sincere in their stance.
Furthermore, I dislike taxes as much as the next guy: As a self-employed person throughout my career, I did not relish the thought of having paid double social security taxes every year.
However, with all due respect, it seems to me that these opponents’ main anti-Y/Z arguments actually undercut their case. Their points are technically true but incomplete and to my mind misleading. That in turn makes me doubt the overall thrust of their contentions.
I’ll accordingly quote and briefly rebut a few of their officially stated claims (as found at the city’s Voting and Election Information site that presents arguments both for and against these two measures):
Opponents’ Claim: “If Measure Y passes, the City can seek to change the charter at any time.”
The Reality: The city government can’t change the charter on its own. Any expansion of the limited charter would require a whole new measure and a whole new vote by Benicians. This would simply be democracy in action.
What’s more, the city has indicated no intention at all to seek to change the proposed limited charter down the line. Measure Y is only for the purposes of instituting a real property transfer tax. Period. It involves nothing else.
The only thing Measure Y opens the door to, then, is badly needed revenues.
Opponents’ Claim: Once Measure Z passes, City Hall can seek to reduce or eliminate that exemption [for homes selling for up to $2 million].”
The Reality: Again, any reduction or elimination in the $2 million floor for the tax would have to be via a future ballot measure that all of us could vote on.
In addition, any city council member who even proposed such a change could lose their next race and otherwise be ostracized, plus the measure could and almost certainly would be voted down. Again, this is all subject to democracy in action.
Opponents’ Claim: “All three California cities that filed bankruptcy — San Bernardino, Stockton, and Vallejo — were charter cities.”
The Reality: There are 25 cities in the Bay Area alone that are charter cities; only one of them (Vallejo) went bankrupt – due to reasons other than its charter status. And as of 2024, roughly a quarter of California cities are Charter Cities. Many have transfer taxes higher than Measure Z proposes for Benicia. This tax is not the kiss of financial death by any means.
Again, Benicia is not even seeking full charter status. Instead, Measure Y proposes just limited status for the sole purpose of transfer tax revenues.
Opponents’ Claim: “Measure Z would raise [only] $230,000 a year.”
The Reality: The point about Measure Z is not what it yields in the next few years (though it could well be higher than $230,000 per year), but that it sets up Benicia for raising millions of dollars down the line, as various housing, commercial and industrial developments take place that in turn trigger increasing transfer taxes.
Measures Z (and Y) are mainly about fueling a future in which Benicia survives and thrives, not about the past or even the present. Let’s also bear in mind the $1,160,000 that Benicia in effect forfeited from the industrial park sale by virtue of not having the Measure Z transfer tax in place a year ago.
Measure X: Modernizing Our Antiquated Business Tax
Measure X modernizes Benicia’s antiquated business licenses tax structure by, among other things, eliminating taxes for any business (be it a home, office or commercial establishment) making less than $100,000 annually. It also helps the city catch up with many years of inflation. The city council approved it unanimously as a ballot measure.
The upshot is that about 1,900 local businesses will no longer be subject to the tax, with over an additional 2,200 either paying less or no tax during the first year after Measure X is enacted.
For larger enterprises, the tax will be capped at $1,500 per year initially (with the rates of $0.25 to $1.25 per $1,000 in gross receipts, depending on the nature of the business). The rates then increase 10 percent per year up to a maximum of $25,000 annually.
Bear in mind, too, that the maximum would apply only to businesses far larger than the typical Benicia establishment.
A significant additional source of revenue under Measure X will be a separate tax of $3 per $100 on receipts for the Benicia Marine Terminal’s (largely auto-based) business.
The Bottom Line: Vote Yes on X, Y and Z
Benicia faces a big fiscal hole of at least $7.5 million per year, which it is addressing through a combination of budget cuts, operational reorganization and enhanced revenues. In addition, as new residential, commercial and industrial developments are built, police, fire, recreational and infrastructure needs will expand.
We accordingly need to approve additional revenue streams, not just for today but for many tomorrows down the line. Some such streams (as in Measures Y and Z) will impose no cost on the vast majority of us. Others (as in Measure X) are simply reasonable attempts to catch up with inflation and replace an antiquated business tax structure; they even eliminate or decrease taxes on some of us.
In a sense, then, the case for these steps is as simple as a, b, c. So…
n-person screening of The Sacrifice Zone
at the Benicia Public Library
on Tuesday 9/29 6:30-8:30 PM.
The documentary unpacks Big Oil’s latest climate scam: carbon capture and storage (CCS).
The short film by Physicians for Social Responsibility LA, will be followed by a panel discussion and Q&A. Hear first-hand from experts featured in the film and from communities already being impacted by carbon dumping projects in the Bay Area and Central Valley.
Sacrifice zones are heavily polluted areas — often fence-line communities in low-income, Black and Brown neighborhoods — that disproportionately bear the brunt of industrial toxins and systemic environmental racism.
Learn how carbon capture and storage is creating a new wave of fossil-fueled sacrifice zones in California. There are already five proposed carbon dumping projects in the Bay Area Delta region.
The League of Women Voters of Solano County is hosting a Local Elections Candidate Forum in a few weeks. Come with your questions on September 30, 6:30-8PM at the Benicia Public Library!
Get informed before you vote! Join the League of Women Voters of Solano County for a nonpartisan Candidates Forum featuring local election candidates. Hear directly from those seeking your vote, learn where they stand on important community issues, and submit questions. This free public event is open to everyone. Make your voice count—be an informed voter!
Local Elections Candidate Forum September 30, 2026 | 6:30 pm – 8:30 pm In the Doña Benicia Room.
Below you’ll find more information on each of the candidates.
KARI BIRDSEYE:
Kari Birdseye was elected to serve on Benicia’s City Council in 2022. She began her service in Benicia city government in 2012 at the Benicia Human Services Board and served on Benicia’s Planning Commission for eight years, as Chair of the Commission for six years. She has served on the Board of Directors for the Solano County Fair Board Association and the Benicia-Vallejo Chapter of the American Association of University Women Executive Board.
She has a BA in Journalism from San Francisco State and a Master of Science Degree in Environmental Management from the University of San Francisco. Kari is former CNN journalist, where she was part of a team that earned an Emmy Award for news coverage of the Olympic Park bombing in 1996. Kari and her husband James have raised their two kids, Julia and Joey in Benicia, and have lived in Benicia since 2000. She has served as president of two local boards: Matthew Turner PTA and the Benicia Stingrays Swim Team. Kari is employed by Natural Resources Defense Council as a Regional Media and Public Affairs Director.
In her City Council capacity, Kari currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Green Empowerment Zone, Marin Clean Energy and is the 1st Vice President of the League of California Cities, North Bay Division.
TERRY SCOTT:
Terry is a 14-year Benicia resident, businessman, futurist, and philanthropist committed to building a stronger future. He served as Vice Mayor and currently sits on the Benicia City Council.
His first term delivered measurable results: a balanced budget, department reorganization, optimized staffing, new purchasing efficiencies, priority-based budgeting, new revenue streams, and advanced air quality and safety measures. That foundation now positions Benicia to seize what’s next — requiring the experienced fiscal leadership and proven results Terry brings, which is why he’s running for re-election.
His public service spans the Tax Oversight Commission, CURE Commission, CAP/Valero Advisory Panel, Tula Sister City Program, multiple Solano Transportation Authority commissions, and the WETA Ferry 2050 Visioning Team. He was appointed SolTrans Board Chair for an unprecedented third term, co-founded and led the Benicia Community Foundation as Executive Director, and chaired the Benicia Arts and Culture Commission (2015–2022).
He holds a degree from Kent State University and completed Executive Studies at Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College.
JUSTIN ZOLLARS:
Justin Zollars, candidate for Benicia City Council, brings 15 years of technology experience from companies including Adobe and Veracyte, where he currently works as a software engineer in cancer genomics. Justin holds an MS in Biology and has founded and led his own startup, giving him hands-on experience managing budgets and coordinating between engineers, partners, and customers. In 2008, Justin represented his community as an elected delegate to a presidential nominating convention. A Benicia homeowner and civic advocate, he’s running in opposition to Flock Safety’s license plate reader cameras over serious privacy concerns. Justin is dedicated to protecting resident privacy, improving parks and roads, and preserving Benicia’s small-town character.
You must be logged in to post a comment.