Interview with Benicia City Council Member Terry Scott

Questions by Stephen Golub… beginning with, “If reelected to the Benicia Council…”

By Stephen Golub, Benicia resident and author, “Benicia and Beyond” column in the Benicia Herald, July 26, 2026

This past week, City Council Member Terry Scott kindly took the time for an interview regarding his background, Benicia’s challenges / opportunities and (having first been elected in 2022) his recently launched campaign for reelection this November. Here are my questions and his thoughts for Part One of the interview. Part Two will appear next Sunday.

  1. If reelected to the Council, what will your priorities be?

My priorities will continue to stay the same that have guided my first term: fiscal responsibility, smart economic development and housing, environmental protection, caring for all our residents, transparent government, and regional leadership. I would add, we must manage three massive priorities in parallel: managing Benicia’s future by reimaging of the Valero site, Rose Estates, Yuba and other housing developments, while building revenue streams to maintain the quality of life that we all expect while enhancing our Business Industrial Park to face forward.

  1. Where did you grow up?

Cleveland, Ohio. Went off to college. Then said goodbye to Cleveland and moved to Florida to play soccer and, in an interesting twist of irony, my first job was as a reporter covering West Palm Beach City Hall for the Palm Beach Post & Times. Bored with City Hall intrigue, I founded my own City Magazine, sold it, headed back to Cleveland to write the Great American novel. Met my wife Randi on a forced blind date. Started writing and marketing for a bunch of ad agencies. Did a futurist project for M&M Mars which lead me to a toy company which was bought by Hasbro and they transferred me to Napa to manage lots of toy divisions. Then from Napa to Pawtucket, RI to head up the whole shebang of Hasbro’s internationally based Creative Services teams. Whew! I’m exhausted talking through that.

  1. How did you end up in Benicia?

Star Wars, Transformers, Indiana Jones brought me here.  Believe it or not. I was working at Hasbro and spending a lot of time at Industrial Light & Magic, working on George Lucas films, which meant weeks at a time up at Skywalker Ranch. In another twist of irony, my oldest son ended up staying in California and renting an apartment above Iron Horse Furniture on First St. which used to be in what is now Lucca’s. So we were in this area a lot to visit him, and we got to know Benicia well. We liked Benicia so much we bought a condo and stayed there instead of a hotel during my trips out west. When I retired from Hasbro we simply landed here, and never looked back.

  1. How have you spent most of your professional career?

Most of my career was in the toy industry, mentoring and bringing out the best in others. When I retired I learned my staff called me ‘Johnny Appleseed’: I’d plant ideas and let my teams run with them. I think toys kept me from ever aging past seven — that childlike wonderment, that sense there’s nothing you can’t do, has stayed with me. I addition I’ve live by the mantra: Did you make a difference today? It was scribbled on my office walls in every job I’ve held. At the end of the day, my career has been about managing lots of people; managing real, significant budgets; and delivering on the promise of getting the job done right.

  1. How did you first become interested in running for the Benicia City Council?

I was appointed to the city’s Arts and Culture Commission in 2015 , thinking it would be fun to work on developing public art, put up murals and be part of projects like Neptune’s Daughter. And I did. But I quickly learned that the real decisions, you know, the ones that shaped the city were happening up a few levels  at the planning level and at City Council. Around the same time, I looked at my own toolkit: years as a futurist, a marketer, someone who’d run a major division at Hasbro — and thought, that’s useful here. I ran in 2020 against Tom Campbell, which, if you know Tom, you know is no small task. I lost that one. I ran again and became a council member in 2022. Honestly, it was as much my neighbors and friends nudging me saying: “you should be doing this” as it was my own ambition.

  1. What accomplishments are you proudest of regarding your time on the Council?

That’s a hard one to narrow down, because a lot of what I’m proudest of isn’t a single vote — it’s being the person on the other end of the phone, email or whatever when someone in this community has a problem. But you want specifics: I’m proud of how we exhibited great fiscal responsibility and balanced the city’s budget for the first time in six years. That’s no small feat. And, we’re moving towards more fiscal responsibility by employing Priority Based Budgeting methods. I’m proud of passing Measures A, B, and F. And honestly, I’m proud that people keep asking me, “Are you running again?” — because it tells me this council hasn’t been kicking the can down the road, and people have noticed.

  1. Are there any particular lessons you’ve learned from your City Council experience, and/or aspects of the work you more fully appreciate now as opposed to when you first started?

First, city government moves at glacial speed. Coming from a business I’m used to moving fast and deciding fast. Coming into city government felt like hitting a wall. By design, the gears of government turn slowly and that was a hard adjustment.

Second, council is a policy-making body, not an operations team. We set direction by telling staff what outcomes we desire. We let the professionals build the solution. It’s a jigsaw puzzle, and our job is to guide the process, not assemble every piece.

Finally, I appreciate now just how much the city is interwoven into the fabric of our lives: public safety, water, sewer, parks, roads, every facet of daily life for residents, businesses, and visitors. It’s a bigger responsibility than I understood when I started, and honestly, it can be overwhelming.

  1. Benicia faces a considerable budget gap due to the Valero Refinery ceasing operations (except as a temporary fuel storage depot) and the resulting loss of city revenue. What do you see as the most promising current and potential steps to close that gap?

We must look at it as a Rubik’s Cube: many sides. Many colors. Turn one side and everything changes.

We’re pursuing several strategies at once. We’re working with the Air District on a Catalyst Grant for roughly $40 million, easing pressure on staff capacity for planning work. We’re working with the state for compensation of the site’s use as a marine fuel terminal. We’re asking voters to pass Measure X, which includes a tax on refined gasoline stored and passed through Valero infrastructure.

We’ve consolidated departments, looked at staffing levels, and we must streamline planning and permitting to make the city easier to build in.

We must capture the ensuing labor and economic activity from the Valero dismantling and remediation. Typically, 100’s of temporary workers are on-site for years during dismantling and remediation. Benicia must plan to benefit from that activity.

Concurrently, we must stimulate growth in the industrial park, create a downtown district plan designed for more retail instead of commercial space, add parking, support more destination events. We should reinvent our pier/ spit for retail use. Welcome new restaurants and understand our generational shift from older residents to younger residents who are steadily growing our property tax base.


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

Stephen Golub writes about democracy and politics, both in America and abroad, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country.

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

Back to top

Benicia residents send “Scoping” comments on Rose Estates

Editor: Benica’s Elizabeth Patterson, Dirk Fulton and Marilyn Bardet offer public comments on Rose Estates proposal. >> CONTEXT: On June 25, 2026, the City of Benicia issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Rose Estates Mixed-Use Project. The NOP informs responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties that the City will prepare an EIR to meet CEQA requirements and establish the scope and depth of the environmental analysis. The city sought PUBLIC comments on the scope of the Draft EIR and its evaluation of potential environmental impacts. Several distinguished Benicia residents provided comments and submitted them by the July 24 deadline. – R. S.

Elizabeth Patterson: Scoping comments on Rose Estates

July 24, 2026

Elizabeth Patterson, Benicia Mayor 2007 - present
Elizabeth Patterson

The following are comments for the proposed Rose Estates project Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The comments are organized by reference to goals and policies of the existing General Plan which supports the goal of sustainable development based on environmental issues of climate, clean air and water management, habitat and aesthetics. Appendix A of the state Land Use and Climate Innovation (LUCI) is included to support additional mitigation measures for potential significant impacts.

The EIR should identify and mitigate significant climate change impacts as listed here:

• Lead agencies must analyze the greenhouse gas emissions of proposed projects, and must reach a conclusion regarding…. [continued – see the 13-page PDF here]

Dirk Fulton – Rose Estates CEQA Scoping

Dirk Fulton

I write to furnish comments on the City’s Initial Study Scoping for the Seeno family Rose Estates project. The large scale of the development and its proximity to the proposed Valero redevelopment project raise significant environmental issues described below and must be considered under scoping criteria:

1. The cumulative impacts of this project together with the neighboring Valero/Signature Properties development which has been presented to the City must be evaluated; see the No Oil case establish this principle and later case law and CEQA regulations.
2. Impacts on City services including…. [continued – see the 1-page PDF here]

Marilyn Bardet – Rose Estates CEQA Scoping

Marilyn Bardet

As a former appointed member of the General Plan Oversight Committee tasked to help rewrite the General Plan that was finally adopted in 1999, and as a 39 year resident of the East Side, I hereby incorporate by reference all scoping comments submitted by Elizabeth Patterson, our former mayor and the professional planner who, as a council member, served to facilitate and guide the work of the General Plan Oversight Committee. Her comments focus on the role the General Plan must play in determining the ultimate qualities of the Rose Estates project, thus, in accordance with sustainability goals, policies and programs, as well as, all applicable state laws, regulations and guidance relevant to all future development in Benicia.

I also incorporate all comments that may be submitted by residents who previously commented in 2007-08 on the Seeno DEIR for their proposed “Benicia business park”, especially Steve Goetz, Bob Berman, Roger Straw and others who were then fully engaged with that project’s lack of consistency with the General Plan’s primary goal of sustainability for benefit of the City and community of Benicia.

My general comments:
I am deeply concerned about how the proposed Rose Estates project, as it is currently presented through Tentative Maps and other preliminary application materials submitted in 2025 by Seeno’s builder, WCHB LLC, will be consistent with core values of the City of Benicia General Plan, the legally binding document…. [continued – see the 4-page PDF here]


MORE ABOUT THE ROSE ESTATES PROPOSAL

HERE ON THE BENICIA INDEPENDENT

Rose Estates on the Benicia Independent

CITY OF BENICIA
City of Bencia Rose Estates Project

For current information from the City of Benicia, check out their ROSE ESTATES page. For larger image, just click on the map at right.

 

City of Benicia North Study Area (Seeno property)

Prior to 2024, the City of Benicia conducted a North Study Area community visioning process – see the old web page.

 


MORE ABOUT SEENO

BENICIA BACKGROUND:
CITIZEN BACKGROUND:
CONCORD/CONTRA COSTA BACKGROUND:

“Rose Estates” is Seeno project all over again…

Editor: I have been overly busy, and failed to send out a timely notice about the City of Benicia’s call for public comments on the 2026 version of Seeno’s proposal to build in Benicia’s northeastern hills, the so-called “Rose Estates” proposal. I missed alerting you to the July 16 meeting and the July 24 deadline for public scoping comments, but many of you did not miss those important dates. See the following two pieces and good links… I will follow this post with several important public comments submitted under the July 24 deadline. – R. S.

Good recent background piece:

The Benicia Bridge, “Rose Estates Update: Public Comments open for housing development” July 16, 2026

A housing development is proposed in Benicia’s rolling golden hills, northeast of the Valero lands and downslope from a former toxic landfill.

click image to enlarge…

Rose Estates, as currently designed, would bring 1,440 single-family homes and 180 multifamily residential units – including hundreds of affordable units. It also includes retail and commercial development, parks and open space. The development would occupy a 527-acre stretch of land between Lake Herman Road and East 2nd Street, surrounding the city’s Water Treatment Plant.

The Seeno family is behind the project – homebuilders with a long and storied record in the Bay Area. The applicant is…  [continued]

About the maps…

Marilyn Bardet, “Tentative Maps for Rose Estate tell a story: Scoping comments for EIR preparation due tomorrow by 5 pm!” by email, July 23, 2026

Dear fellow Benicians,

A picture is worth a thousand words. A plan view map of a massive development project proposed for our northern hills is a picture worth looking at closely.

Have a look at the Tentative Maps for the Rose Estates as currently proposed. [below]

For your benefit— a bit too late, admittedly— I’ve attached screenshots of a few of the Tentative Maps the developer provided to the City, and which are posted on the City’s website, where all of the maps are presented, somehowing enlarged sections of various “village” areas of the development site. I’ve selected only a few to show you to highlight the extent of the massing and design of the plan.

If you haven’t yet seen them yet or have forgotten about what’s proposed, here in a nutshell you can see a few of the maps and imagine the whole development of 527 acres of our northern hills.

The entire property has been owned by Seeno for decades, and several times Seeno has proposed developments that were ultimately rejected and then withdrawn, in 2005, and again in 2007-’08, the latter for a business park for mainly warehousing. Now the project proposal is predominantly for residential, to be developed by WCHB Development LLC.

The maps show the suburban layout of 1,440 single family homes, each averaging 2,500 sq ft with 45% lot coverage. There are 180 multi family units located together at the east end of the site, and, two commercial areas, one along East 2nd and the other wrapping around toward Lake Herman Rd. There are 3 small parks.

Please put on your thinking caps and ponder what these maps tell you and call up.

For example: notice on the “Overall Map[Rose Estates Project] that old Reservoir Rd, (which currently leads up to Lake Herman Rd from East 2nd St, and which borders the City’s property dedicated to our city water supply intake), is “erased”— removed. Notice that two new major boulevards would link Lake Herman Road to East 2nd Street.

On the last map below [TRACT MAP], you’ll see a blowup of the planning area farthest east on the site where the 180 multi-family housing units are proposed to be located: all clustered in one place, next to one of the two proposed commercial areas, and far from the 3 parks.

— Look closely: right above the area for the multi family units, e.g., outside the boundary of the site, you’ll see the entrance to the IT Panoche Class I Hazardous Waste Dump, which was “closed” way back in the early 90’s. BUT all the toxic materials impounded in that site are still in the ground, held back by a porcelain cement “earthen dam”, which is located right at the base of Lake Herman Rd. and across from the site for multi-family housing. Our former mayor Jerry Hayes reminds us of the liability that future homeowners will bear should those toxins move in the ground, leach into Paddy Creek, etc etc. CalEPA’s Dept of Toxic Substances is supposed to be monitoring the dump site for any water intrusion and contamination….

The city is inviting our comments on what the full extent of the scope of the environmental review should address. The Environmental Impact Report [EIR] is the public’s legal tool for understanding and evaluating a development’s various foreseeable impacts, such as impacts pertaining to traffic; air quality; geotechnical/soil stability; GHG climate (vehicle miles traveled ), energy; water supply; City services; infrastructure, protections for streams, creeks, wildlife, and scenic vistas.

Maps can tell you lots! Just imagine. This is your city, this could be its future. . .

Editor: the public comment period closed on July 24. Please disregard this paragraph…
You can send in your comments to planning@ci.benicia.ca.us (the name of the planner in charge of receiving Scoping comments was not identified on the City’s website for Rose Estates— or I couldn’t find it!) The City says, “Project information will be posted and maintained on the City’s website at www.ci.benicia.ca.us/roseestates.”

Marilyn Bardet

I believe the public comment period should be extended so that more people can become aware of the project as a whole and have their say.  See maps BELOW

Onward!
🙂 Marilyn

* * *

From the City’s website: Rose Estates
The City of Benicia has received a Development Application for Rose Estates, a proposed site development of the 527 acre “North Study Area” property for residential and commercial/industrial uses. The applicant, WCHB LLC, asserts that the Development Application is filed under provisions of the so-called “Builders Remedy” (Government Code section 65589.5(d)(5) of the Housing Accountability Act).
The project proposes:
• Development of approximately 1,440 single-family residential units and 180 multifamily residential units
• Construction of approximately 110,000 square feet of retail and 152,000 square feet of commercial/light industrial
• Provision of three parks of approximately 2.6 acres, 2.7 acres, and 6.0 acres
• Preservation of approximately 245 acres of undeveloped land for open space, including sensitive habitats, wetlands, and natural slopes

click on the map to enlarge…

click on the map to enlarge…

Return to top


MORE ABOUT THE ROSE ESTATES PROPOSAL

HERE ON THE BENICIA INDEPENDENT

Rose Estates on the Benicia Independent

CITY OF BENICIA
City of Bencia Rose Estates Project

For current information from the City of Benicia, check out their ROSE ESTATES page. For larger image, just click on the map at right.

 

City of Benicia North Study Area (Seeno property)

Prior to 2024, the City of Benicia conducted a North Study Area community visioning process – see the old web page.

 


MORE ABOUT SEENO

BENICIA BACKGROUND:
CITIZEN BACKGROUND:
CONCORD/CONTRA COSTA BACKGROUND:

Automatic license plate readers like Flock aren’t your standard traffic cameras

Automatic license plate readers like Flock aren’t your standard traffic cameras; they create digital “fingerprints” of vehicles and upload the information into an AI-powered database. And, following reports of misuse and potential ties to immigration enforcement, anti-surveillance groups have cropped up across the country. “I like to equate it to a police officer following you around every time you get in your car,” said Tobias Halpern, California Polytechnic State University student. Halpern is the founder of DeFlock SLO, which successfully pushed for the removal of 17 cameras on campus.

MS NOW Connect, by Jacob Soboroff, July 19, 2026 (via YouTube)