Train carrying crude oil and propane derails in western NY

East Aurora train contained flammable, explosive materials – Rail company refuses to divulge cargo

WKBW, 7 Eyewitness News, by Charlie Specht, May 22, 2020

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WKBW) — Since Monday’s train derailment in East Aurora sparked fears of “bomb trains” carrying toxic substances, the Genesee & Wyoming Railroad has sought to downplay the danger of the crash, stressing that no one was hurt and damage was limited.

But 7 Eyewitness News has learned that despite the company’s refusal to provide a complete accounting of the train’s contents, dozens of railcars that were pulled by the derailed engine were filled with flammable and explosive materials.

And since the railroad opened back up Thursday, even more cars carrying crude oil and propane have quietly rolled through.

“This was really a best-case scenario,” said East Aurora Fire Chief Roger LeBlanc said of Monday’s derailment. “It should have flopped onto Main Street. There should be a crater in the village.”

LeBlanc said the train conductor soon after the derailment approached him with a manifest of the cargo.

“He showed it to me,” LeBlanc said. “He didn’t give it to me. He had a death grip on that thing.”

7 Eyewitness News has learned that despite a railroad company’s refusal to provide a complete accounting of the train’s contents, dozens of railcars that were pulled by the derailed engine were filled with flammable and explosive materials.

The fire chief said the conductor told him the cargo included 19 propane tankers, between 8 to 10 tankers of crude oil — which has caused devastating explosions like the 2013 derailment in Quebec, Canada that killed 47 people — and at least one tanker of butane.

The conductor had “great concern” on his face when mentioning the propane, LeBlanc said.

“I’m thinking, ‘Oh my God, this thing’s gonna go,’” LeBlanc said, adding that thankfully, there were no explosions because the conductor said multiple cars behind the derailed engine were empty.

A railroad spokesman on Thursday said 66 railcars were empty, including 15 of the 17 derailed cars. But 32 railcars were “loaded with a variety of commodities,” according to Michael E. Williams, vice president of corporate communications for Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, which runs the Buffalo & Pittsburgh rail line.

Williams repeatedly declined to answer questions about the contents of the 32 cars, other than to say that two of the cars were carrying lumber.

“Railroads do not share train manifests with the general public for security reasons,” Williams wrote in an email. “The train was carrying what was properly tendered to the railroad to transport under its common-carrier obligation. It is safe for your viewers to assume that the loaded cars in the train were carrying commodities that are integral to modern life.”

Williams stated that the train’s manifest was provided “to the incident commander on site, per standard protocol,” but both LeBlanc and Police Chief Shane Krieger said they did not receive copies of the manifest.

First responders like LeBlanc and Krieger said they came away from the experience thankful that East Aurora, with many wood-frame buildings and 19th century historic structures, did not have to deal with a major explosion.

“If it would have hit any of the buildings or the restaurant, it could have been an ignition point,” LeBlanc said. “There’s a lot of things that could have happened.”

Williams stressed that railroads are “by far the safest means of ground freight transportation – much safer than trucks, which are the alternative.”

Still, the transport of flammable cargo appears to be occurring on a regular basis in East Aurora and other small towns lining the tracks from Salamanca to Buffalo.

Just after 11 p.m. Thursday — hours after Genesee & Wyoming announced the re-opening of the track — 7 Eyewitness News witnessed a string of train cars roll above Main Street through the village.

The tanker cars carried the red hazardous material placards for propane and crude oil.

Another coronavirus death in Solano County, 13 dead in last 11 days


Friday, May 22: 6 new positive cases, 1 new death. Total now 455 cases, 20 deaths.

Solano County Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Updates and Resources.  Check out basic information in this screenshot.  IMPORTANT: The County’s interactive page has more.  On the County website, you can hover your mouse over the charts at right for detailed information.

Previous report, Thursday, May 21

Summary

  • Solano County reported 6 new positive cases today, total is now 455.
  • 1 new death today, total is 20.
  • Thank goodness no new confirmed cases among young persons 18 and under today.  The County reported 11 new cases among our youth in the last 9 days, having reported only 6 over the 5 weeks prior.  (See table below).

BY AGE GROUP

  • No new cases were reported today among young persons under 19 years of age, total of 17 cases, 3.7% of total confirmed cases.  (See table below.)
  • All 6 of today’s new cases were persons 19-64 years of age, total of 323 cases, 71% of the total.   No new deaths in this age group, total of 4.  Note that 43 of the 323 cases in this age group have been hospitalized at one time, an increase of 4 since yesterday and 13% of total cases in the age group(It is unclear whether the 4 deaths were ever hospitalized.)
  • No new case was of a person 65 or older, total of 115 cases, 26% of the total.  1 new death, total of 16.  Note that 30 of the 115 cases in this age group (25%) were hospitalized at one time, nearly double the percentage in the mid-age group(It is unclear whether the 16 deaths in this age group were ever hospitalized.)
Recent surge in positive cases among youth 18 and under
Date New cases Total
Friday, May 22, 2020 0 17
Thursday, May 21, 2020 3 17
Wednesday, May 20, 2020 0 14
Tuesday, May 19, 2020 0 14
Monday, May 18, 2020 1 14
Friday, May 15, 2020 2 13
Thursday, May 14, 2020 3 11
Wednesday, May 13, 2020 1 8
Tuesday, May 12, 2020 1 7
Monday, May 11, 2020 0 6
Friday, May 8, 2020 0 6
Thursday, May 7, 2020 0 6
Wednesday, May 6, 2020 0 6
Tuesday, May 5, 2020 0 6
Monday, May 4, 2020 0 6

CITY DATA

  • Vallejo added 1 of today’s new cases, total of  267.
  • Fairfield added 3 of today’s new cases, total of 83.
  • Vacaville added 1 of today’s new cases, total of 45.
  • Suisun City added 1 of today’s new cases, total of 22.
  • Benicia remains unchanged at 21.
  • Dixon, Rio Vista and “Unincorporated” are still not assigned numerical data: today all remain at <10 (less than 10).  The total numbers for other cities add up to 438, leaving 17 cases somewhere among the locations in this “<10” category (same as last reported).  Residents and city officials have pressured County officials for city case counts.  Today’s data is welcome, but still incomplete.

HOSPITALIZATIONS: 73 of Solano’s 455 cases resulted in hospitalizations, 4 more than yesterday.

ACTIVE CASES:  47 of the 455 cases are active – good news: 6 fewer than yesterdayNote that the county does not report WHERE the active cases are.  Below you will see that only 18 are currently hospitalized, which leaves 29 of these 47 active cases out in our communities somewhere, and hopefully quarantined.

HOSPITAL IMPACT: The County shows 18 of the 69 hospitalized cases are CURRENTLY hospitalized, same as yesterday.  The County’s count of ICU beds available and ventilator supply remains at “GOOD” at 31-100%. (No information is given on our supply of test kits, PPE and staff.)

TESTING

The County reports that 9,340 residents have been tested as of today, an increase of 367 residents tested since yesterday’s report. 
We still have a long way to go:
just under 2% of Solano County’s 447,643 residents (2019) have been tested.  See Solano testing – by the numbers April 13 – presentNOTE: State run testing sites in Vallejo and Vacaville are open to anyone.

Solano’s steady upward curve – as of May 22

This chart shows the infection’s steady upward trajectory in Solano County.  Our “curve” continues to creep up.  Our nursing homes, long-term care facilities and jails bear watching!

Still incredibly important – everyone stay home if you don’t need to go out, wear masks when you do go out, wash hands, and be safe!

Solano County COVID-19 testing – by the numbers April 13 – present

By Roger Straw, UPDATED ON May 22, 2020
Workers with the Solano Public Health Office collect samples for testing during the county’s first drive-thru testing facility for first responders and essential job employees on April 8 at the Solano County Fairgrounds in Vallejo. (Chris Riley/ Times-Herald)

Health experts everywhere are in agreement: the only way to stop a renewed outbreak of coronavirus cases and deaths is to press forward with widespread testing and contact tracing.  Experts on the economy agree that a key to restarting the economy is increased testing.

The Solano County Public Health department has reported on the number of our residents tested on a daily basis (Monday-Friday) since April 13.  Over this period, the daily number tested has varied widely, from 29 to 1,021, averaging 192 per day. (See table below.)

Today, the County reported 367 residents newly tested since yesterday.  The total number of Solano County residents tested as of today is 9,340, still just under 2% of the population (477,643 as of 2019).  Here’s hoping these numbers continue to increase in the days and weeks ahead.

State run testing sites in Vallejo and Vacaville are open to anyone.

Solano County COVID-19 Dashboard – Residents Tested
Source: https://www.solanocounty.com/depts/ph/coronavirus.asp
Date # Tested (cumulative) # Tests Added
(M-F report)
Daily Avg
(Weekend)
Monday, April 13, 2020 1,855
Tuesday, April 14, 2020 1,922 67
Wednesday, April 15, 2020 2,015 93
Thursday, April 16, 2020 2,169 154
Friday, April 17, 2020 2,324 155
Monday, April 20, 2020 2,463 139 46
Tuesday, April 21, 2020 2,506 43
Wednesday, April 22, 2020 2,555 49
Thursday, April 23, 2020 2,584 29
Friday, April 24, 2020 2,627 43
Monday, April 27, 2020 3,065 438 146
Tuesday, April 28, 2020 3,570 505
Wednesday, April 29, 2020 3,676 106
Thursday, April 30, 2020 3,713 37
Friday, May 1, 2020 4,099 386
Monday, May 4, 2020 5,160 1,061 354
Tuesday, May 5, 2020 5,219 59
Wednesday, May 6, 2020 5,286 67
Thursday, May 7, 2020 5,297 11
Friday, May 8, 2020 5,369 72
Monday, May 11, 2020 5,576 207 69
Tuesday, May 12, 2020 5,669 93
Wednesday, May 13, 2020 5,934 265
Thursday, May 14, 2020 6,008 74
Friday, May 15, 2020 6,761 753
Monday, May 18, 2020 7,368 607 202
Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7,736 368
Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7,961 225
Thursday, May 21, 2020 8,973 1,021
Friday, May 22, 2020 9,340 367
Average daily number tested (adjusted for weekend count) 192

UPDATE: 13 dead, 132 infected at Windsor Vallejo Nursing Home

Coronavirus: Thirteen dead at Windsor Vallejo Care Center

More protests planned at Vallejo care center
Protesters picket in front of the Windsor Care Facility in Vallejo where 13 people have died and at least 130 have been infected with COVID-19. (Chris Riley—Times-Herald)
Vallejo Times-Herald, by John Glidden, May 20, 2020

The health emergency at Windsor Vallejo Care Center worsened Wednesday after Solano County officials confirmed two more people have died after being infected with COVID-19 at the skilled nursing facility, bringing the total number of deaths at the facility to 13.

Jayleen Richards, Solano County public health administrator, said 10 of the infected individuals were in hospice care at the time of their deaths. She said 99 residents, and 33 staff members have been infected with COVID-19 as of Wednesday.

Prior to release of the new numbers Wednesday, Maria Grimaldo led a protest of about a dozen people outside the facility, demanding it take better care of its residents.

“Light needed to be shined on Windsor’s practices pre-COVID, but now it’s more of a driving force for me,” she said.

Grimaldo’s 86-year-old grandmother, who is a resident at Windsor, has tested positive for COVID-19.

“My grandma would be left in her own feces, we would have to fight them just to give her a blanket. Sometimes she wouldn’t get dinner until 8 p.m. at night,” Grimaldo said.

She said her grandmother is receiving more attention and care after being moved to the part of the building reserved for COVID-19 positive residents.

“She shouldn’t have to get COVID-19 to receive better care,” Grimaldo added.

Grimaldo blamed the staff at Windsor for infecting her grandmother with COVID-19.

“How did she get it? She’s been in a segregated part of the building since the third week in April,” Grimaldo said.

When asked, Grimaldo believes the problems at the facility start at the management level, which then trickles down to the staff who “lack bedside manner.”

“Prison inmates get treated better,” Grimaldo said.

Grimaldo said she will continue to protest outside the facility, which is located at 2200 Tuolumne St., every Wednesday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

Attempts to reach Windsor staff were unsuccessful.

Reached for comment on Wednesday, Vallejo Mayor Bob Sampayan said the city has no jurisdiction over the skilled nursing facility. However, he did say the city is working with the county to monitor the situation.

Due to the loss of so many employees to COVID-19, Kaiser Permanente has begun providing care for Windsor residents, according to a joint statement from Senior Vice President/Area Manager Nor Jemjemian, and Chris Walker, physician-in-chief for Kaiser Permanente’s Napa Solano Area

“The health and safety of our patients, staff, and the community is our priority. We recognize that COVID-19 is a rapidly evolving situation and we are doing everything we can to keep our members, staff and communities as safe as possible,” they said. “We are deeply grateful to our medical teams, staff, and employees who are expertly and compassionately caring for and protecting our members, patients, communities, and each other.”

It wasn’t immediately known what type of staffing is assisting at Windsor.

County officials began testing residents and health care workers in late April after the facility reported nearly a dozen residents had been infected with Coronavirus. That initial number doubled ballooned to 76 residents infected in early May. At that time, there weren’t any reported deaths.