Refinery towns like Benicia have a lot to consider in the years ahead as we as a global society take bigger and more aggressive steps toward phasing-down – and phasing-out – fossil fuels, but the most pressing questions boil down to one central, throbbing toothache: what comes after?
What comes after refineries, especially for refinery towns?
You’ve probably seen a lot of gloomy speculation, opportunistically amplified by special-interest groups with the most to lose (we’re looking at you, Big Oil lobbyists!), but peer closer, deeper, and you will see there is plenty of room for optimism.
NBC10-Philadelphia recently broadcasted a report by anchor Karen Hua that described the city’s vision for the future of a space once blighted by a powerful polluter, a refinery operated by Philadelphia Energy Solutions (PES) that exploded in 2019, launching thousands of pounds of toxic chemicals into Philly’s air after years of rampant emissions violations.
While the refinery that had been there before employed 1,000 workers, the new business center that is featured to take its place is slated to create 28,000 union construction jobs before settling down to a projected 19,000 new, permanent jobs for Philadelphia residents.
While tempting, comparing those 28,000 temporary and 19,000 permanent jobs to the 1,000 jobs provided by the demolished plant, dusting our hands off, and announcing, “Well, that’s settled!” is wrongheaded along the lines of apples-and-oranges math. That comparison, while heartwarming, just doesn’t show the whole picture.
Job growth and tax base expansion are certainly fabulous goals, but they do not together contrive the most important lens we need to view South Philly’s transition away from a refinery operation as its primary taxable industry.
Instead, we should view South Philly’s transition through a wider lens, one that demonstrates exciting dividends for a city that was forced to address the big question of ‘what comes after?’ years before it thought it was ready to do so: substantially reduced air pollution and greatly diminished threat of human and environmental harm, in support of a safer, healthier and more economically prosperous – and economically diverse, meaning beholden to no single industry or business for its growth and sustenance – community. (That’s the hope I have for Philly, anyway.)
Sure, a giant industrial logistics complex like that which is being built in South Philly is unlikely to appeal to Benicians as we look to our shared future after refineries, whether that future is 10 or 100 years ahead of us.
But the message of hope remains. There are many opportunities for a post-refinery town in a post-refinery world. Rather than clutching our weathered pearls in fear of losing the patronage of a corporate overlord with dubious motives, Benicia officials and residents could embrace the future and start diving for new pearls, to strand onto new necklaces that will certainly make much better heirlooms for our kids than what we have now.
Despite the doom-and-gloom forecasts perpetuated by naysayers who are deeply invested in delaying the inevitable phase-down or -out of the fossil fuels industry, there is always room for optimism in towns and communities like Benicia.
Check out the video below to learn more, and we’ve provided a transcript for you below if you prefer reading.
NBC10 PHIL.: Thirteen-hundred acres of South Philly that was once an oil refinery is being completely transformed and that could make way for new businesses. It’s a project that will also create nearly 50,000 jobs.NBC 10’s Karen Hua joins us from the Bellwether District with a look at how the oil refinery that caught fire several years ago is now getting a new start.
NBC10 / KAREN HUA: This groundbreaking means a clean slate. These 1,300 acres sits under the Passyank Ave. Bridge in South Philly. The Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refinery was here for decades, until June 2019, when the whole facility caught fire, something nearby residences long feared would happen.
Officials ultimately demolished the oil refinery leaving this space vacant, but now this land is being transformed.
SEN. ANTHONY WILLIAMS (D-PA): As long as I’ve lived, this site has been the number-one polluter of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the East Coast. It is now no longer the number-one polluter, but it has actually reduced emissions.
NBC10 / HUA: Reducing Philly’s emissions by 16%, and it’s a project to create 19,000 permanent jobs and nearly 28,000 union construction jobs.
PHIL. CITY COUNCILMAN KENYATTA JOHNSON: So this is a project that will allow us to erase the stigma of being the number-one big city filled with poverty, to be the number-one city that’s filled with economic growth and development.
NBC10/ HUA: With thousands of people employed, the hope is this will organically solve one of the root causes of violence.
PHIL. MAYOR JIM KENNEY (D): What it means is public safety. It means a young man or woman can earn $60, 70, 80,000 to be able to raise their families, sustain their families, have some dignity in their lives, and don’t ever have to pick up a gun for any reason whatsoever again.
NBC10/HUA: The goal is also to attract businesses and e-commerce to Philly.
PA GOV. JOSH SHAPIRO (D): Think about the uniqueness of the location, connected to downtown, our universities, Philadelphia International Airport, and just a couple-hours’ drive from 25% of the American population.
For companies that want to get their products to market, I can’t think of a better place to be then right here at the Bellweather district.
Learn more about the Philly Bellwether District’s new complex here.
[Note from BenIndy: According to the Wall Street Journal, there ‘hasn’t been a major new oil refinery built in the U.S. since the 1970s, and many plants are more than 100 years old’ – including the BP refinery in Oregon, Ohio that killed two brothers last year, as detailed in this amazing WSJ article. (Our own Benicia Refinery was completed in 1969, for Humble Oil, which changed its name to Exxon in 1972. Valero purchased the property in 2000.) Meanwhile, according to the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, ‘2021 was the worst year for serious incidents at U.S. refineries since 2015, measured by hours worked, with the rate of so-called process-safety events 25% higher than in 2019 and 2020’ (cited in this article). These shocking numbers underscore a truly heartbreaking story shared below, a story all refinery town residents should sit with as we take a hard look at the deteriorating facilities yet looming in our own backyards, degrading in real time as they prop up a dying industry supposedly slated for phase-out.]
America’s aging oil refineries faced pressure to ramp back up quickly after the pandemic. BP’s Ohio site spiraled into tragedy.a
Wall Street Journal, by Jenny Strasburg | Photographs by Brittany Greeson for WSJ
OREGON, Ohio—Ben Morrissey wasn’t supposed to be at the refinery the night it blew up.
A new-hire trainee, Ben stuck around after his shift ended to help his big brother, Max, try to regain control over a facility that was belching smoke and flashing an unusually bright, towering flare that could be seen all over town.
The overtime was just part of the lure for Ben, a 32-year-old with a second baby on the way, an old house to remodel and a decade of hard-fought sobriety under his belt.
Ben also had reasons for wanting to stay close to his older brother.
Max, 34, had recently told friends and family that he was nervous about going to work. Over the summer, he took a brief leave, citing the stress of the job and concerns about safety.
Coming out of the pandemic in 2022, London energy giant BP had ordered a costly and complicated maintenance tuneup, a monthslong project called a turnaround. An army of employees and contractors put much of the facility, located in the Toledo suburb of Oregon, through a complete shutdown and systematic restart.
It is accepted wisdom in the industry that, just as airplane takeoffs and landings are the most dangerous times of flight, refinery risks can run highest during a turnaround.
By the end of July, BP was ready to ramp back up, but complications continued to emerge, as workers struggled to regulate pressures and curb a troublesome buildup of liquids.
On Sept. 20 of last year, Max had been back from leave for about a month when his supervisors asked him to come in before his shift to help resolve the latest problems. He declined, opting instead to keep working in the pizza and ice cream shop he had recently opened, and which he believed would be his ticket out of the refinery.
Max’s father, Bob Morrissey, was helping in the shop that day. “I told you guys, you guys are f—ed up over there, and I’m not coming in until I have to,” he heard Max say over the phone.
By the time Max arrived at the refinery for his 5 p.m. shift, workers had spent the prior 12 hours wrestling a cascade of malfunctions into submission, in part by shutting down several key units.
The lull was deceiving. All of the problems and temporary fixes had changed the underlying recipe of the oil flowing into the refinery’s production machinery, according to preliminary government findings and BP’s own internal assessment of what happened that day.
Among the changes: After being diverted earlier, liquid was accumulating in a drum where it wasn’t supposed to be.
About an hour into Max’s scheduled evening shift, the Morrissey brothers were among a small team dispatched over crackling radios to tackle the liquid buildup—apparently unaware that it was naphtha, a highly flammable substance distilled from crude. They were working outside surrounded by towering equipment. Some of the naphtha could be routed to the flare, where it could burn off, and some of it could be sent to the refinery’s self-contained sewer system.
But the drum kept filling too quickly. Alarms blared in the control room.
The brothers—wearing breathing apparatuses and protective gloves—began draining naphtha to the ground. A vapor cloud formed around them.
Refinery veterans say a vapor cloud, like a shimmery mirage over a highway on a hot day, is difficult to see when you’re close to it. But other nearby workers could see the telltale distortions at the edges of the cloud, with Ben and Max standing inside it.
When the wind shifted on the path of an approaching storm, it pushed the cloud toward a giant nearby furnace.
At 6:46 p.m., a boom reverberated for miles and blasted a wall of flame and smoke through the heart of the refinery.
One worker nearby, Thomas Newman, saw Max stumble out of the flames, engulfed from head to toe.
Max screamed at Newman to find Ben.
Newman blasted Max with water and struggled to drag him away from the fire, trying not to pull off chunks of his severely burned skin. Max screamed to let him try to walk.
Then Max asked Newman to call his wife, Darah.
“Darah, this is Tom, I work with Max,” Newman told her. “He’s hurt really bad.”
Darah sensed the panic in Newman’s voice. She asked if Max was going to the hospital.
“And he just said, ‘I don’t know. I don’t know. Oh, my God, I just gotta get him out of here.’”
This account of what happened that day and in the months leading up to it is based on conversations with dozens of people who have worked at the refinery or are familiar with its operations, as well as hundreds of pages of documents including BP’s own nonpublic reports on the accident, internal BP emails and records tied to refinery staffing, finances and maintenance. It is also based on photographs, audio and video recordings related to the refinery and public reports from government investigations.
Three federal agencies have issued final or preliminary findings about the explosion, with two regulators citing the refinery operator for a range of training and operational deficiencies. One of the agencies, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, identified 10 violations it called serious, including the failure to train workers about the presence of naphtha and to control how refinery equipment is drained. Two other investigations are continuing.
BP has spent years working to come out of the shadow of two of the most devastating industrial accidents in U.S. history, including a 2010 explosion that destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico, killing 11 workers and causing billions of dollars in environmental damage. In 2005, a deadly explosion at its Texas City, Texas, refinery killed 15 workers and injured more than 170 others.
The company is contesting OSHA’s findings about the Toledo explosion. In a statement, a BP spokesman said the company is cooperating with accident investigations, adding, “Wherever we work, safety is BP’s priority. We are determined to learn from last year’s terrible accident at the Toledo refinery that resulted in the deaths of Ben and Max Morrissey.”
America’s Aging Refineries
There hasn’t been a major new oil refinery built in the U.S. since the 1970s, and many plants are more than 100 years old, including the one in Toledo. U.S. petroleum-refining capacity peaked in early 2020, according to federal data, and by the start of this year there were 124 refineries in operation nationwide, 51 fewer than three decades ago.
The costly work of maintaining refineries dropped off sharply in 2020 as Covid-19 stifled fuel demand. Refineries postponed planned maintenance and improvement projects—first during Covid and then amid supply-chain disruptions and pressure to ramp back up to take advantage of high profits from resurgent demand. Shareholders in big oil companies and refinery operators were hungry for cash following huge losses in 2020.
“A lot of refiners, if they could, pushed projects into 2022 so they could take advantage of high margins,” said Hillary Stevenson, an analyst with energy-research and data firm IIR Energy, who wasn’t referring specifically to BP. With their shrunken capacity, she said, “refiners had to do more with less.”
As the pandemic wore on, safety suffered. Industry statistics compiled by American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, an industry lobbying group, show that 2021 was the worst year for serious incidents at U.S. refineries since 2015, measured by hours worked, with the rate of so-called process-safety events 25% higher than in 2019 and 2020.
The incidents, including releases of chemicals, crude, vapors and other substances serious enough to cause injuries, evacuations or other consequences, ticked down last year but remained above the 2019 level. The AFPM notes that over recent decades, industry safety has improved significantly.
For BP, its sprawling U.S. refining business long conflicted with an effort to recast itself as a green company that was “Beyond Petroleum.” From 2010 to last year, the company sold off refineries, cutting the number globally to seven from 16, with the U.S. refinery count reduced to three from five, including fully and partially owned sites. After Bernard Looney took over as CEO in February 2020, he redoubled efforts to cut harmful greenhouse-gas emissions and oil production, in a strategy he dubbed “Reinvent BP.”
Its workers didn’t know it yet, but the Ohio refinery would soon find itself on the BP discard pile.
‘We have a lot of things that can go ‘boom’ in this town’
Since 1919, the former Standard Oil plant in the Toledo suburb of Oregon has been churning out some mix of gasoline, diesel, asphalt, propane and jet fuel through its snaking labyrinth of tanks, valves, towers, furnaces and piping sprawled across the south shore of Lake Erie.
With its long main drag of aging strip malls, chain family-style restaurants and local watering holes, Oregon has about 20,000 residents and a suburban-rural-industrial vibe, with webs of railroad tracks passing neighborhoods with brick and clapboard houses and farms with duck ponds.
Refinery workers in this union stronghold can routinely pull in $140,000 a year including overtime and bonuses, plus good benefits, without a college degree.
Oregon’s two big refineries protrude from the pancake-flat landscape 4 miles apart on opposite sides of town, just across the Maumee River from Toledo. The landmark Veterans’ Glass City Skyway bridge connects Oregon to Toledo.
Four workers died in 2004 when a massive crane being used to construct the bridge collapsed. One of them, a 42-year-old ironworker, was Ben and Max’s uncle.
The risks associated with the heavy industry that powers the local economy are embedded in daily life.
“We have a lot of things that can go boom in this town,” said former Oregon fire chief Denny Hartman, who retired in 2022.
BP, operating as British Petroleum, bought into the Toledo refinery in the 1980s. Through restructurings it came to be known as the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery.
After Looney took over as CEO, executives said BP would streamline refinery maintenance including turnarounds, and put that business under one roof in the corporate structure with its global oil-and-gas production.
Looney’s Reinvent strategy also eliminated thousands of jobs globally. At the Toledo refinery, the cost-cutting meant more than one out of every 10 salaried employees left, many through a wave of buyouts, leading managers to backfill jobs with less-experienced workers, according to internal documents and people close to the decisions.
Looney, who resigned from BP in September over what the company described as failures to disclose details of past relationships with colleagues, referred requests for comment to BP.
A turnaround is a crucial maintenance project to enable repairs and upgrades. It is like tearing apart and rebuilding a life-size industrial Erector Set, with the complexity of shutting down and restarting furnaces, boilers and flares with toxic liquids and vapors that can be deadly even when operations are in a steady state.
The plan in late 2021 was for BP and its refinery co-owner, Calgary-based Cenovus Energy, to invest more than $400 million in the plant during the 2022 turnaround, according to internal communications.
But the turnaround was messy, with cost overruns, a spate of fires that delayed work and operating problems that continued even after the formal end of the project, internal refinery documents show.
During the first half of 2022, the plant’s roughly 600-strong workforce ballooned with the addition of around 5,000 third-party contractors on site each day at the project’s peak, according to internal refinery communications.
The thousands of contract workers, many from petrochemical and refining hubs in Texas, filled Oregon’s hotel rooms and bedrooms that locals rented out across town. For much of spring and summer, locals say, hangouts like Luckies Barn & Grill were teeming every night with out-of-town workers.
On March 23, 2022, Des Gillen, then the Toledo refinery’s general manager, sent an email memo to all Toledo staff. It marked the 17-year anniversary of BP’s Texas City refinery disaster.
“This tragedy affected BP to the core, and changed the way we view safety forever,” Gillen wrote. He urged managers to pull their teams together and talk about Texas City and how to apply its lessons to the coming turnaround, including responding to safety alarms and closely following written procedures.
“Where that can’t be done safely then we should stop, assess the risk and document any changes,” Gillen wrote.
Yet problems persisted. Over one 10-day period in July, the refinery suffered more than 20 instances known as “loss of primary containment,” spills and accidental releases of both toxic and nontoxic materials. Several were serious, causing management to call for extra vigilance around valves and pressure readings, documents show.
Some workers in charge of operating refinery equipment complained supervisors were rushing safety checks and asking employees to sign off on procedures that hadn’t been completed to show progress with the turnaround, according to private communications and people involved in some of the discussions.
The undertaking meant that as soaring margins fueled huge profits at U.S. refineries, BP-Husky was almost entirely offline for three months. The documents show the refinery lost $404.2 million during the first seven months of 2022, more than BP had forecast, by a measure BP calls replacement cost profit that is similar to net income.
Immediately after the turnaround, in early August, BP disclosed that it would sell its half-ownership of the refinery to Cenovus for $300 million and relinquish its operating role. The Canadian company said in its Aug. 8 announcement that the just-finished turnaround would “improve operational reliability” at the refinery.
Before BP had a chance to turn over the keys, the refinery would claim two lives.
The Morrissey Brothers
Maxwell Morrissey was a prankster, famous among his classmates for doing a backflip off the stage at his high-school graduation.
A marathon runner and triathlete, he tried for two and a half years to qualify as a Navy SEAL but left the service in frustration after repeated injuries.
He got work on the assembly line of the massive Jeep plant in Toledo, following in the footsteps of his father, a former senior automotive-union leader, before moving into better-paying refinery work. He started at the BP plant in April 2020, the early depths of the pandemic.
The more reserved of the two, Benjamin Morrissey took a more tortured path.
A drug addiction that his parents said had started in high school with weight-loss pills to manage his bulk for wrestling escalated to include narcotics for minor injuries. That soon devolved into a heroin habit.
Ben’s parents tried to push him into rehab, but it didn’t take. They said he overdosed twice and had to be rushed to the hospital.
“We thought we were going to lose him,” said his father.
Ben decided he couldn’t clean up close to home, and in late 2011, he looked farther afield. He soon enrolled in an inpatient center run by Franciscans an hour’s drive north of New York City. He spent several months at a shelter that provided 24-hour support, transitioned to outpatient care and came out clean for good.
“Are you guys ready to have 110% fun?” newly sober Ben would ask friends before they headed out on beaten-up dirt bikes or fired up the grill for a beer-free barbecue, remembers Mark Choinski, a financial planner who went through recovery with Ben and stayed close with him. “He always wanted to be at the party, without having to party.”
Living in New York’s Hudson Valley, Ben hired on as an ironworker, got certified to weld on bridges and showed a knack for fixing up motorcycles and boat engines. He met his future wife, Kaddie, at Max’s 2016 wedding in Mexico.
She remembers asking why he wasn’t drinking, and he said he was sober. She found him cute and awkward, “but it was like a good awkward.” They danced and talked all night, then dated long-distance before marrying three years later.
Ben eventually moved back to Oregon, where his sisters Carolyn and Erin were living with their families near Max and their parents. They were all still grieving the 2014 suicide of their sister Katie at age 29.
Having Ben back home, sober and in love, with a toddler son, pulled the family together in new ways.
Ben found nearby support meetings and was soon leading some of them. Now he was organizing get-togethers and cooking meals for the whole family.
“It was joyful,” said sister Carolyn. “I had my guard up just because I was worried about him falling into old habits.…But he was holding his own.”
Max, who by now had two small boys with his wife Darah, vouched for Ben with his bosses at the refinery.
The boys were close. They grew up wrestling together in high school and shared dreams of building lake houses and hosting family cookouts and fishing trips as their own children grew. In his obituary, Max’s family said his nieces and nephews called him “the Fun-cle.”
About six months into their marriage, “Max came to my work and said, ‘I need to borrow your car. I need to drive to Detroit real quick,’” Darah recalled.
“And he came home with a pizza oven.”
A couple of days later, he added a food-service truck that he planned to park in downtown Toledo to serve people coming out of minor-league baseball games and bars at night. That morphed into Red Eye Pie and Frozen Fantasty’s, a carryout pizza and ice cream restaurant.
With a sliding window at the walk-up counter, picnic tables and kids’ bikes parked out front, the restaurant had its grand opening in May—four months before the accident.
Max usually didn’t talk much about the details of his refinery job, Darah said, but last year, he told her, one of his sisters and a close friend that he was nervous about going to work. He battled with supervisors and took off about a month of “stress leave” during the summer.
“His safety concerns were genuine,” said friend and colleague Dustin Jones, 42, who worked closely with Max and was with him minutes before he died.
In late 2021, Max and his colleague Thomas Newman shot cellphone video of a relatively new piece of equipment, the piping of a heat exchanger connected to a gas plant. In the video, liquid is spewing from seams in the piping and pooling on the ground. It was naphtha.
Max sent one of the videos to colleagues, in which he complained that people at the refinery wouldn’t take his safety alerts seriously. He told co-workers that the refinery across town, where he worked for several years before joining BP, wouldn’t have let such malfunctions and leaks go unfixed.
It couldn’t be learned whether BP addressed any of Max’s complaints.
Max’s complaints made him unpopular to some of his bosses, and frustrated co-workers who thought he could have been more measured when he spoke up about what he saw as problems at the plant.
“I think everybody liked Max, but Max couldn’t go with the flow. He liked to stir the pot,” Jones said. “But he was right.”
At home, Max appeared increasingly anxious.
“He told me I didn’t understand how dangerous his job was,” Darah said. “He told me that BP was going to kill him.”
She told him that if he wanted to, he should quit and they would figure out the money and health insurance, which she lacked working as a hairdresser. But she also said she thought he was being dramatic in his impatience to be his own boss.
“You’re fine,” she said. “You’re not going to die there.”
‘Our lives are just forever changed’
The refinery started to show signs of trouble late on the night of Sept. 19 and got worse in the early-morning hours before workers arrived for the 5 a.m. daytime shift.
In and around a unit known as Crude 1, the towering heart of the refinery’s production machinery, valve pressures and liquid levels climbed to dangerous levels.
One of those valves was labeled “Process Safety Valve 1457,” in keeping with refinery practices of tagging equipment for maintenance and record-keeping. PSV-1457 was a heavy cylinder about two feet tall. Its purpose was to relieve pressure above set operating limits to prevent harm to equipment and people when things went wrong.
The valve had been worked on during the turnaround, including testing and quality-control checks, according to detailed turnaround records, some of which list names of a BP supervisor and an outside contractor alongside tasks to be performed.
But on this morning, PSV-1457 couldn’t handle the pressure. BP and outside investigators would later say it was wrongly configured for the job—wrong design, wrong pressure rating, according to BP’s internal assessment—making it a root cause of the refinery’s accelerating instability. Increased naphtha flows pushed PSV-1457 past its limits, leading it to chatter, or rapidly open and close, which caused a deafening racket as nearby equipment shook violently.
An operator called for a shutdown of the unit. A supervisor said no, according to accounts of workers who were there.
The severe vibrations continued. At around 8 a.m., workers found naphtha spewing to the ground from a failed weld—eventually enough to fill a small backyard swimming pool. Over the next two hours, they fought to beat down the resulting naphtha vapor cloud with water from high-capacity jets while they raced to isolate the valves and stop the bleeding. Several suffered chemical burns on their legs and feet.
The vapor cloud could have been catastrophic, but the water blasts managed to dissipate it.
Through the morning and afternoon, Oregon residents circulated photos on social media and text chats of the apparent troubles at the refinery, evidenced by the larger-than-normal flare atop the main tower.
Hartman, the fire chief, also noticed it, and drove over to the main refinery entrance to see what needed to be done.
“When you see a change in that flare stack, you know something is wrong. They were burning big and bright,” he said.
Hartman ran into his assistant chief there, who had also noticed the flare. They phoned the BP fire chief inside and asked what was going on.
“We have an unusual event, it’s under control, we’re not going to need you,” Hartman said he was told. They left.
The naphtha hydrotreater and another nearby unit were shut down. The gas plant that Max had complained about—with the video showing the naphtha spray—was bypassed.
Crude 1 kept running, but at a rate of around 84,000 barrels a day, less than its normal 100,000 or more. Crude 1 is where Max and Ben would soon be working side by side, after Ben overstayed his shift and Max arrived.
They hugged as they greeted each other outside amid the roaring machinery.
But soon there was chaos inside the refinery control room—a cacophony of alarms with lights flashing red, yellow and magenta.
Different supervisors gave overlapping and conflicting instructions about how to handle the plant’s spiraling issues, partly because they themselves had incomplete knowledge of everything going wrong, according to workers and documents tied to some of the investigations. Both inside the control room and outside with the roaring machinery, some employees making split-second decisions that changed the course of the day’s events had barely any experience in the jobs they were filling that night.
Several units of the facility had already been turned off, and some people inside the control room pushed to shut down the central crude unit.
One control-room operator, Doug Andrews, had come on duty at 4:15 p.m. Andrews had spent years operating the equipment outside, but he had just come out of training in the control room. It was buzzing with more people than normal, confusing the reporting lines.
Andrews, growing increasingly worried about the level of the liquid in the fuel-gas mix drum, made three requests to more-senior employees to shut down the heat sources feeding the main crude tower, according to notes from an interview that was conducted as part of BP’s accident investigation and accounts of workers who were there.
“Don’t quit,” one of the more-senior control room operators told Andrews. “You’ve got this,” another said, standing behind him and his flashing computer screens. Still another colleague didn’t say anything at that moment, but later said he was worried they were going to lose the refinery.
“I don’t have control,” Andrews said as smoke poured out of the refinery stacks. He was losing pressure readings. He moved to shut down key furnaces without anyone giving him permission, he later told BP lawyers. But it was too late.
Max and Ben were among the four workers who responded to requests from control-room operators to drain the mix drum, according to federal investigators with the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. At that time, personnel were unaware the liquid was naphtha, according to BP’s internal report.
Co-workers said the protective equipment Ben and Max were wearing would have made it difficult, if not impossible, for them to smell or feel the liquid to help them know what they were draining. It might have been more-benign wastewater, for all they knew. And exactly what orders were given, or how clear they were—there were also problems with radio transmissions, and confusion over who was in charge, several workers say—remains in dispute.
After a while, two of the workers dashed off to troubleshoot other problems, leaving Ben and Max. BP, in its internal report about the evening of Sept. 20, refers to the brothers as unnamed “outside operators” and says they drained the liquid directly to the ground, against refinery rules.
OSHA in its findings said BP failed to evaluate how the mix drum might over fill and how to drain it, which it said “exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards from potential releases of flammable liquids or gasses.”
From a house about a mile away from the refinery, Randy Tharpe II, an Applebee’s manager who used to work at the BP plant, heard the blast and called 911.
“I just heard ‘boom.’ I see smoke. And I see gas plumes in the sky,” Tharpe told a 911 operator, according to a recording of the call.
His voice took on more urgency.
“I don’t want to blow up.”
At home 2 miles away, Max’s wife Darah was making dinner for their boys, Wilde and Recker, ages 4 and 2 at the time, and looking online at flights for a trip she and Max were planning to Walt Disney World at Christmas. She didn’t want to go to the theme park again—it wasn’t exactly relaxing—but Max had insisted it should be an annual tradition.
Her cellphone rang. She didn’t recognize the number and let it go to voicemail. It rang again immediately.
It was a man, and in the background, someone unrecognizable to her, screaming.
Newman told her about the blast and that Max was hurt. Shortly after hanging up, he snapped photos of Max with his cellphone, at Max’s request. Max’s own phone was charred.
In one of the images, Max is sitting on a plastic bucket, looking down where most of his clothes are missing except for part of his shirt and his boots. In another, his eyes, wide-open and wild, look straight into the camera. He looks shocked but also capable of standing up and walking away.
Ben was likewise lucid, giving hope to co-workers who continued fighting the fire after the brothers were rushed to the hospital—first in Toledo, and then to Ann Arbor, Mich., by ambulance.
Darah got to Ann Arbor about the same time as the ambulance, and the rest of the family gathered together as the prognosis for the brothers grew increasingly dire.
That night, Kaddie told family members that she and Ben were expecting another child—a daughter, Benna, who would be born the following year.
Bob and Patty Morrissey say the family is broken in ways that may never be fixed.
“Everybody’s in therapy. People are on antidepressants,” Patty Morrissey said. “Our lives are just forever changed.”
In the driveway of their Oregon home, there was a fishing boat with a new motor, welded in place one night by Ben as a surprise for his dad. Out back by the pond was the barbecue where the brothers would hold family cookouts. In the dining room, Bob Morrissey showed a wall of high-school graduation portraits of their five children.
“Yeah,” he said, “the two on the left are the only ones left.
—Family videos and photographs of Max and Ben Morrissey provided by the Morrissey family. The refinery video at the top of the story is by Ryan Rohm via Storyful —Design by Kara Dapena
State seeks fee on dangerous chemicals crisscrossing California
By Tony Bizjak, July 22, 2016 6:00AM
HIGHLIGHTS • California officials say the state isn’t prepared to handle hazardous materials spills • A new $45 fee on every rail car carrying dangerous substances will help beef up spill response
Day and night, trains crisscross California pulling long strings of tanker cars carrying volatile gas, chemicals and crude oil.
These shipments have long played a key role in powering the state economy, providing materials for medical supplies, computers and fertilizers, as well as fuels for vehicle fleets. But they also pose the risk of catastrophic spills.
Jolted by a series of oil train explosions nationally, including one in Oregon last month, the state this summer has drawn up a list of what it says are the 25 most hazardous materials shipped on rail in California. It plans to impose a new $45 fee later this year on every rail car carrying one of those materials. The money will be used to ramp up the state’s emergency spill and fire response capabilities.
The state Legislature ordered the fee program after a Governor’s Office of Emergency Services analysis that found significant gaps in California’s ability to deal with spills, especially in rural and remote areas.
The fee plan is disputed by the state’s major railroad companies who say they think it’s illegal.
The top 25 list includes materials that are dangerous to humans either by direct contact or because they are highly flammable. They include ammonia, chlorine, propane, butane, fertilizers, acids, petroleum gases and oils.
“When one of these trains derails, it puts lives, property and the economy at risk,” said State Fire and Rescue Chief Kim Zagaris. “And right now, we don’t have surge capacity to deal with a major spill.”
Because of the secrecy shrouding shipments of hazardous materials, it’s hard to know how big a risk they pose. State safety officials and private shippers refuse to disclose the amount, frequency, routes or timing of hazardous material shipments, citing federal safety regulations and state health and safety law restrictions, as well as concerns about terrorist or other criminal acts.
50 Approximate number of spills in the Roseville railyard in 2015
Even local fire departments typically don’t know in detail what materials are coming through, although they can get some after-the-fact information about hazardous materials that have traveled through their areas, if they request it.
Hazardous materials in train tanker cars can be identified, however, at least generically, by the identification numbers on diamond-shaped placards displayed on the sides of cars.
Trains observed by The Sacramento Bee in recent weeks in downtown and midtown Sacramento carried numerous hazardous materials, including liquefied petroleum gas, sulfuric acid and liquids designated hazardous at temperatures above 212 degrees Fahrenheit. A few trains were carrying either cleaning fluid, weed killing fluid, diesel fuel or other flammable liquids. Others were listed as holding unspecified petroleum distillates or petroleum products.
Shippers also have acknowledged transporting Bakken crude oil and Canadian tar sand oil through Sacramento neighborhoods.
California’s planned $45 per-train-car fee will pay for the creation of 12 specially trained hazmat teams to be spread out geographically near “gap” areas where there is a lack of expertise and equipment to deal with major spills, state Office of Emergency Services officials said.
Most will be in the lower Central Valley, on the coast and in Southern California. One hazmat team will be located in Yuba City, not far from the Feather River Canyon, where trains carrying hazardous materials travel the steep mountainside above a river that provides drinking water to urban areas as well as water for Central Valley farms.
Many larger fire departments already have specially trained hazmat teams. There are four in the Sacramento area, one each stationed in Roseville, Natomas, Carmichael and south Sacramento.
Railroad companies contend the proposed fee is illegal under federal law, which prohibits states from putting any constraints on interstate commerce via rail. Under the state plan, the companies that own the hazardous materials must pay the fee, but railroad companies must collect the fee from them and convey it to the state.
The Union Pacific and BNSF – the two main hazardous materials shippers in California – sent letters to the state last month saying the fee interferes in the railroads’ business dealings with their shipper customers and demanding the state desist.
“These emergency regulations violate federal law; therefore, (California) must abandon the process of adoption,” UP assistant vice president Phillip Christensen wrote. “No state can regulate the rates or charges a railroad collects from its customers. This kind of ‘economic regulation’ is categorically prohibited” by federal interstate commerce law.
UP officials declined to be interviewed for the story. The company sent The Bee an email saying that safety is the railroad’s primary focus when transporting hazardous materials. The email did not say whether the railroad might sue the state to stop the fee.
The American Chemistry Council, which represents hazmat shippers, said its members are concerned that California’s actions could lead to dozens of states imposing rail fees, creating what chemistry council spokesman Scott Jensen calls a confusing “patchwork” of regulations without certainty about how the money would be spent, beyond creation of some hazmat teams.
Dow Chemical regulatory affairs official Dale Backlund said his company would like the state to meet more with the industry to talk about the best approach to conducting emergency response training. “Can we slow down the train and think through the implications of this?” he said.
NO STATE CAN REGULATE THE RATES OR CHARGES A RAILROAD COLLECTS FROM ITS CUSTOMERS.Union Pacific’s Phillip Christensen
Despite such complaints, state Office of Emergency Services officials say they plan to impose the fee later this year, although they expect to continue talking with the railroad companies and shippers about fine-tuning the fee program.
“It is law now,” Zagaris said. “We are following the law.”
The state plans to collect up to $10 million annually from hazardous materials shippers, to be placed in the Regional Railroad Accident Preparedness and Immediate Response Fund. The fund will be capped at $20 million.
Although hazardous materials also are shipped on highways, the fee is being applied only to rail shipments, mainly because the threat of a major spill incident is greater on rail, Zagaris said.
“It is a bigger item for us to deal with, takes a larger response, more surge capacity and it puts the public and environment at more risk,” he said. “That’s not to say, at some point, (the state) won’t come back and try to ID things transported on the road.”
Railroads and hazardous materials shippers argue that the risks of oil and hazmat spills are being overplayed by anti-oil advocates and some community leaders. Very few trains derail, they note, and most hazardous material spills are small. A crude oil train crash in a Canadian town three years ago, though, unleashed a firestorm that killed 47 people, some in their sleep.
A Bee review of the state’s rail spill database found that hundreds of hazardous material spills occur annually. The database represents an incomplete listing, based only on initial reports, not on post-response findings. But it does offer a glimpse at the many types of hazardous materials that run on local rails.
Most spills are small and many happen in railyards around the state, such as the Union Pacific yard in Roseville. There were about 50 reported spills in the Roseville yard in 2015. The largest local spill that year, as initially reported, was 300 gallons of diesel fuel that leaked due to an improperly closed locomotive fuel filter cap. Other small spills around the Roseville yard in 2015 involved butane, oil, liquid petroleum gas, anhydrous ammonia, picoline and sodium sulfide.
Larger spills, though rare, can be devastating to wildlife and rural economies. The most notorious modern rail-related toxic spill in California occurred 25 years ago when a train derailed and spilled 19,000 gallons of the pesticide metam sodium into the Sacramento River near Dunsmuir, killing aquatic life on a 40-mile stretch of the river for years. Rail safety improvements have since been made at a tight rail curve at that spill site.
In Sacramento, several dozen trains cross daily in downtown Sacramento on two main freight lines. A Bee review of trains on those tracks recently found that more than half of the trains included at least a few cars carrying hazardous materials.
One freight line is a north-south route that comes through the region between Yuba City and Stockton and passes through midtown Sacramento between 19th and 20th streets. The other is an east-west route that runs through Roseville and on a berm above downtown Sacramento, through the downtown railyard and through Davis, adjacent to downtown and the university campus.
Sacramento City Fire Department hazardous materials coordinator Jerry Apodaca said the Sacramento region, with four hazmat teams, is well positioned to deal with a potential spill. But he and other local fire officials say they remain on alert, not knowing on any given day what shipments are coming through or when.
“We don’t know what’s in those cars until we get there,” he said.
CALIFORNIA’S LIST
The state wants to impose a $45 fee on rail cars that transport the 25 materials the state considers most hazardous. The list, with the hazard identification number of the materials:
Repost from Earthjustice.org [Editor: I’m reposting this map today – it was recently updated and still highly relevant. Earthjustice’s map shows Major Crude-by-Rail Accidents since 2012 (Red Symbols) and communities opposing Crude-by-Rail (Green Symbols). – RS]
More crude oil was spilled in U.S. rail incidents in 2013, than was spilled in the nearly four decades since the federal government began collecting data on such spills.
Since late 2012, as hydraulic fracturing and tar sands drilling created a glut of oil, the industry has scrambled to transport the fossil fuel from drill sites to the east and west coasts, where it can potentially be shipped overseas to more lucrative markets.
The increase in oil rail traffic, however, has not been matched with increased regulatory scrutiny. Oil trains are not subject to the same strict routing requirements placed on other hazardous materials; trains carrying explosive crude are permitted to pass directly through cities—with tragic results. A train carrying Bakken crude oil derailed in the Quebec town of Lac-Mégantic on July 6, 2013, killing 47 people in the small community.
In the absence of more protective regulations, communities across the country are beginning to take matters in their own hands.
Legal Cases
Earthjustice represents groups across the country, fighting for protections from crude-by-rail:
DOT-111s are rail cars designed to carry liquids, including crude oil, and have been in service in North America for several decades. They are prone to punctures, oil spills, fires and explosions and lack safety features required for shipping other poisonous and toxic liquids. As crude production in the United States has surged exponentially in recent years, these outdated rail cars have been used to transport the crude oil throughout the country.
The U.S. and Canadian government recognized decades ago that the DOT-111s were unsafe for carrying hazardous materials, finding that the chance of a “breach” (i.e., loss of contents, potentially leading to an explosion) is over 50% in some derailment scenarios.
U.S. and Canadian safety investigators have repeatedly found that DOT-111s are unsafe and recommended that they not be used for explosive or hazardous materials, including crude oil; however, the U.S. government’s proposal to phase out these rail cars fails to take sufficient or immediate action to protect the public.
Q. What is Bakken crude oil?
Bakken crude refers to oil from the Bakken shale formation which is primarily in North Dakota, where production has skyrocketed in recent years due to the availability of newer hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) techniques. The increase in the nation’s output of crude oil in 2013, mostly attributable to Bakken production, was the largest in the nation’s history.
Bakken crude is highly flammable, much more so than some crude oils. Today, Bakken crude moves in “unit trains” of up to 120 rail cars, as long as a mile and a half, often made up of unsafe DOT-111s.
Q. Are there alternative tank cars available?
Transporting Bakken crude by rail is risky under the best of scenarios because of its flammability. But legacy DOT-111s represent the worst possible option. All new tank cars built since October 2011 have additional some safety features that reduce the risk of spilled oil by 75%. Even so, safety investigators, the Department of Transportation, and the railroad industry believe tank cars need to be made even safer. Some companies are already producing the next-generation rail cars that are 85% more crashworthy than the DOT 111s. Petitioners support the safest alternatives available, and expect that the ongoing rulemaking process will phase out all unsafe cars.
Q. What steps have U.S. and Canadian governments taken?
The U.S. government recognizes that Bakken crude oil should not be shipped in DOT 111 tank cars due to the risks, but has done shockingly little to limit their use.
In May 2014, the DOT issued a safety alert recommending—but not requiring—shippers to use the safest tank cars in their fleets for shipments of Bakken crude and to avoid using DOT 111 cars. Canada, in contrast, responded to the Lac Mégantic disaster with more robust action. It required the immediate phase-out of some DOT-111s, a longer phase-out of the remainder, and the railroads imposed a surcharge on their use to ship crude oil in the meantime.
In the absence of similar standards in the U.S., the inevitable result will be that newer, safer cars will be used to ship crude in Canada—while the U.S. fleet will end up with the most dangerous tank cars.
You must be logged in to post a comment.