Category Archives: San Francisco Bay Area

Stay-at-home order coming soon in San Francisco Bay Area

Bay Area projected to reach threshold in “mid-late December”

twitter.com/KQED – Governor Newsom announced the details of a sweeping new stay-at-home-order that will come into effect for three weeks in certain California regions when their intensive care unit capacities drop below 15%.  The Bay Area is projected to reach that point in “mid-late December.”


Newsom to impose new stay-at-home orders in California’s hardest-hit areas

San Francisco Chronicle, by Alexei Koseff and Peter Fimrite, Dec. 3, 2020 2:32 p.m.
Two respiratory therapists (no names given) wheel a CPAP machine with a modified viral filter through the emergency department at Seton Medical Center in Daly City, Calif. Friday, May 1, 2020. As ER and ICU doctors gain a better understanding of previously unknown COVID-19 complications, such as blood clots, they are changing the way they care for patients. Doctors are now giving many patients blood thinners in light of emerging evidence that many are developing small and large blood clots that cause strokes. They're also finding that CPAP machines often work better to help patients breathe than ventilators, which were once thought to be a standard course of treatment for patients struggling to breathe.
Two respiratory therapists (no names given) wheel a CPAP machine with a modified viral filter through the emergency department at Seton Medical Center in Daly City, Calif. Friday, May 1, 2020.  Photo: Jessica Christian / The Chronicle

SACRAMENTO — Vast swaths of California will fall under new shutdown orders in the coming weeks after Gov. Gavin Newsom announced additional restrictions Thursday to try to slow the surging number of coronavirus cases in areas where intensive care unit capacity is dwindling.

Newsom said he was “pulling the emergency brake” to help California through a third surge of the pandemic this winter, one he hoped would be a final ordeal before a coronavirus vaccine becomes widely available.

“The bottom line is if we don’t act now, our hospital system will be overwhelmed. If we don’t act now, we’ll continue to see a death rate climb, more lives lost,” Newsom said during a news briefing. But, he added, “There is light at the end of this tunnel. We are not in a permanent state.”

The regional orders will close personal care services such as hair and nail salons, playgrounds, bars and wineries, movie theaters, museums and zoos in places where ICU capacity has dropped below 15%.

Retailers, grocery stores and other businesses in those regions that are allowed to remain open will have to operate at 20% capacity, and restaurants will be able to offer only takeout or delivery. No outdoor or indoor dining will be allowed. Schools that have received a waiver to reopen can continue to offer in-person classes.

Charts show how Bay Area’s current coronavirus surge is already worse than the last one

San Francisco Chronicle, Kellie Hwang and Mike Massa Nov. 19, 2020
[Editor – Solano County not mentioned in text, but the final chart in the story shows Solano’s recent surge.  – R.S.]

In the summer, coronavirus cases were surging across the Bay Area. Now, they’re surging again. But will this round prove worse than before?

While the Bay Area overall has tended to do an effective job of controlling the virus throughout the pandemic, experts are deeply concerned about the trajectory of this latest surge.

“Given that we’re almost at the (summer) peak, even if we were to start aggressive intervention now, it’s very likely the total number of cases will exceed the worst numbers the Bay Area has ever seen so far,” said Robert Siegel, an infectious disease expert at Stanford University. “As these rates go still higher, it looks like we’ll join the rest of the country in the worst rates we’ve ever had in the pandemic.”

The worst rates for the Bay Area may not approach the devastation that unfolded in New York City early in the pandemic, or what’s happening now elsewhere in the country. Still, hospitalizations due to COVID-19 across the Bay Area have increased 38% since the beginning of November, with more than 400 patients for the first time since Sept. 23.

And, as many experts have said throughout this pandemic, the virus knows no boundaries.

“The whole state is experiencing this crush of cases, indeed the entire country is experiencing this crush of cases,” Santa Clara County health officer Sara Cody said in a news conference Monday. “In the past, we knew that we could rely on asking for help from other jurisdictions if we needed it. That’s not the case now because everyone is quite busy attending to their own residents and their own communities.”

Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, said rapid spread in rural parts of states that didn’t see big summer surges could have an exponential impact on California, as residents are widening their pods and moving around more.

“As the whole nation heats up, we’re going to be more at risk for bringing the virus into the state,” she said.

She said Californians may feel that they have been good throughout the pandemic, and decide to travel to a place where there is a “huge disparity in public messaging and government leadership.” That, she said, could in turn worsen the surge in the Bay Area.

Here are the main factors that make today’s situation different from the summer surge, and potentially more dangerous.

What’s different about this surge

To analyze how the current increase in cases compares to the summer surge, we looked at the average increase in new cases per day, which shows not just the mounting cases but the pace at which they are increasing.

From mid-May to mid-June, the period when cases first started to climb in California, the average increase in daily new cases was 46 stateside. From mid-June to mid-July it shot up to 193.5. In the Bay Area, the curve stayed flat longer and the number of new cases went from 3.1 early in the surge to 22.8 over the second half. (On July 15, a computer glitch in the state reporting office occurred, making data for the following few weeks unreliable with unreported cases followed by the clearing of large backlogs.)

Compare those numbers to the data from mid-October, when the latest surge in California began, to now, covering a span of 30 days: The average increase of new cases per day was 204.8 statewide, and 23.13 in the Bay Area. Both of those numbers are higher than during the final 30 days of the previous surge.

According to health officers, the primary factor driving this current surge appears to be social gatherings, with more people heading indoors as the weather cools. Many counties also point to pandemic fatigue in communities as people tire of sheltering in place and abiding by restrictions.

Unlike previous surges, the current one appears to be impacting a broader swath of people across the Bay Area.

In the summer, the spread was concentrated among groups including agricultural and factory workers, nursing homes and other congregate living facilities, Siegel said. Cases have disproportionately affected essential workers and communities of color, particularly the Latino populations in many counties.

Now, the spread is occurring everywhere.

In Contra Costa, for example, the summer surge was concentrated in communities of color and among essential workers.

“The surge we are seeing now is still hitting those communities hardest, but we are seeing increases in every community, so it is more widespread this time,” said Karl Fischer, spokesperson for Contra Costa Health Services.

The average increase in new cases per day was 2.1 in the summer surge, spiking to 3.3 during its height. Now, it is 4.5.

Fischer said this current surge shows a “rapid increase.” He said the county’s positive test rate and hospitalizations have also increased significantly in the past month.

In Napa, the peak case rate over the summer was 20.7 per 100,000 people. In the last week, the rate has gone as high as 26.3, the highest rate the county has seen so far, according to health officer Karen Relucio. (These rates are not the figures the state uses for reopening tier assignments, which are adjusted based on the number of tests performed in a county.)

In a presentation to the Napa County Board of Supervisors on Nov. 10, Relucio said a lack of cooperation with contact tracing has resulted in 35% of cases that are of unknown origin, which stunts the county’s ability to control the spread if they don’t know where the virus is coming from. Other drivers include household transmission, gatherings and travel outside of state.

The public messaging is empathetic, but also more direct now as the situation becomes more dire, Relucio said.

“Wishful thinking and complacency will not make the pandemic go away,” she said. “It’s past time for people to take personal responsibility, redouble their efforts and realize their actions affect others.”

In Marin County, health officer Matt Willis said the summer surge was concentrated in the essential worker population, primarily the Latino community, where many individuals were exposed at work and then brought the virus home. But recently, case rates in the essential worker and Latino communities appear to be steady.

“What seems to be driving cases now over the last three weeks is more cases among our white residents,” he said. Cases are more geographically spread across the county now, and they are being increasingly driven by social gatherings.

“The weather has just started to turn cold, we haven’t seen any influenza yet, the real holidays haven’t even begun, we’re still bringing children back in the classrooms and facing a lot more travel,” Willis said. “What’s particularly concerning is that this very rapid acceleration has preceded those things that we were most concerned about.”

Marin County, which dealt with the San Quentin outbreak in the summer, only recently started to see a rise in cases during this latest surge.

Why this surge may be more dangerous

Another worrisome factor in the Bay Area’s current spike is that it started with higher numbers compared to the period before the summer surge. A steep curve starting from a small number of cases is less dangerous compared to a steep curve starting from a lot more cases, Siegel said.

“That is manifest in the fact that many populations are being infected that were uninfected before,” he said.

During the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday, health officer Dr. Sara Cody noted several differences in the current surge versus the summer surge, including that the county never got back to the low baseline reached in May.

“The rate of rise has been both steeper and faster than any of the previous increases that we have been experiencing here or elsewhere in the state,” she said.

In San Mateo County, congregate care facilities accounted for the bulk of coronavirus cases early on. The county sent support teams to assist with staffing and establishing isolation and quarantine protocols, which greatly helped reduce the numbers. Now, cases are rising among younger people, said Louise Rogers, chief of San Mateo County Health.

“Now we’re focused on really driving the message home to residents,” she said. “It’s our behaviors that are really key to beating back the virus right now, which includes wearing face coverings and avoiding gathering over holidays to protect the safety of our loved ones.”

Rogers said the county is in better shape now to address the surge than before, with supports in place including PPE, testing, hotel rooms and other infrastructure.

Willis said Marin County plans to triple staffing for contact investigation, mobile testing and testing results teams.

San Francisco officials have been preparing since the start of the pandemic for the possibility of more hospitalizations, and ensured hospitals have discussed and reviewed surge plans, said health department deputy director Naveena Bobba.

“The most recent surge demonstrates that this is bigger than any one county or any one region,” Rogers said. “I don’t have a crystal ball, but I’d really like to see the Bay Area set the course and demonstrate how to flatten this curve again.”

Troubling trend in Bay Area pandemic – more young people infected, ill

[Solano County’s COVID age group data doesn’t mesh with age group data given in this report.  But I can report that 10% of Solano cases are youth under 18, significantly higher than in April.  And although the 18-49 age group is 41% of the County population, it represents over 61% of total cases, by far the highest percentage of all age groups.  More Solano data here.  – R.S.]

Troubling trend in pandemic: More young people infected, ill

San Francisco Chronicle, By Catherine Ho, August 10, 2020

A young crowd attends the Juneteenth celebration at Lake Merritt in Oakland. Young people make up thefastest-growing demographic contracting the coronavirus in many regions.
A young crowd attends the Juneteenth celebration at Lake Merritt in Oakland. Young people make up the fastest-growing demographic contracting the coronavirus in many regions. Photo: Nina Riggio / Special to The Chronicle

As the coronavirus enters its eighth month, a troubling trend has emerged in the Bay Area and around the nation: More young people are getting sick, in numbers so large that in some regions they now make up the largest and fastest-growing demographic contracting the virus.

It marks a dramatic shift from the narrative that dominated the early weeks of the pandemic, when health experts emphasized that older adults, in part due to the higher likelihood of chronic health conditions, were most at risk of falling ill.

“We are seeing increased rates of infection among young adults,” Santa Clara County public health officer Dr. Sara Cody said at a July county board of supervisors meeting. “It’s where the epidemic is spreading the most quickly. … This is disproportionately accelerating among young adults.”

In six Bay Area counties, people in their 30s or younger make up the largest proportion of cases. In San Francisco, for instance, 18-to-40-year-olds represent 48% of all cases; in Santa Clara County, 20-39­year-olds represent 39% of all cases. Anecdotally, the region’s medical clinics are reporting a major uptick in younger people coming in with COVID-19 symptoms like shortness of breath, fever and cough.

Statewide, the number of cases among people ages 18 to 34 shot up 1358% between May 1 and Aug. 1, from 12,373 to 180,354 — representing an increase from 24% of all cases to 35% of all cases, according to the California Department of Public Health. During the same period, the number of cases among people 65 and older grew more slowly, 387%, from 11,547 to 56,206 — representing a drop from 22% of all cases to 11% of all cases.

At the Stanford coronavirus outpatient clinic, the proportion of patients under age 40 has more than doubled since April, from about 25% to 55%, said Dr. Maja Artandi, the clinic’s medical director.

In the South Bay, Kaiser is seeing more patients under age 30 getting hospitalized with COVID-19, which was unusual during the first surge in March. And more patients in their 20s are also seeking medical care for the virus from their primary care doctors.

“It’s worrisome,” said Dr. Charu Ramaprasad, an infectious disease physician in Kaiser’s San Jose Medical Center, who has been leading much of the health system’s coronavirus response.

Health officials and physicians have not pinpointed exactly why younger adults appear to be driving the latest surge in infections. But many believe it is likely because young people have been going out more — either for jobs that require them to interact with the public frequently, or in social settings — and are being more lax about social distancing and wearing masks.

And younger people may experience less severe symptoms, which may lead them to think it’s OK to gather with friends if they have just a minor cough or a scratchy throat, said Dr. Aisha Mays, medical director of the Dream Youth Clinic at Roots Community Health Center in Oakland.

“We have seen our young folks have a false sense of security that make them more susceptible to contracting COVID,” Mays said. “In the beginning, we were really concerned about our elderly population because they are so much more susceptible to the negative effects of COVID, including death. At the same time, it might have sent an unintended message to our young people that they were more immune to contracting COVID.

“We know that’s not true. We know young people can still contract COVID as easily as anyone else.”

People in their 20s and 30s are less likely to be hospitalized or die from the coronavirus than people in their 60s and 70s. Eight out of 10 coronavirus-related deaths in the United States have been among adults 65 or older, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And hospitalization rates for people between 18 to 29 years old are 56 per 100,000, compared to 281 per 100,000 for people between 65 and 74 years old.

Still, many young people have symptoms severe enough to send them to the emergency room or intensive care. And even if they have mild symptoms, they still risk exposing older family members or friends who may get much sicker from the virus.

One of them is Tyler Lopez, 27, who in June began experiencing fatigue and chest congestion and lost his sense of smell. Lopez tested positive for the coronavirus, quarantined for 10 days and felt like he had recovered — but was soon hit with a second and much more severe wave of symptoms.

His heart rate repeatedly shot up to above 120, at times going as high as 140, even when he was sitting or lying down, and he had a fever and chest pain so bad it felt like the inside of his chest was inflamed, he said.

Lopez, who lives in Riverside, was admitted to a hospital twice. Doctors ran tests and concluded the COVID-19 infection likely caused inflammation in the tissue surrounding the heart, and that he could’ve gone into cardiac arrest if the medication he received at the hospital had not reduced the inflammation fast enough, he said.

“It’s just crazy what COVID can do,” said Lopez, who was released from the hospital last week and is recovering at home. He plans to go back to his doctor next week to see if he can get cleared to return to work — nearly two months after he first noticed symptoms. “The past couple months, it totally changed my life.”

Before he got sick, Lopez said, he did not take the virus seriously and continued going to the gym and meeting up with friends.

“I was like, ‘It’s not that big of a deal, whatever, if I get it, I get it,’ ” he said. “I was just living life without taking that extra precaution.”

He now wishes he had been more careful.

“It jacked me up,” he said. “I wouldn’t wish this on my worst enemy.”

Local health officials recently launched initiatives to urge people in their teens and 20s to practice social distancing, wear masks and limit activities to the outdoors like biking or hiking. Contra Costa County beginning Aug. 10 will start training hundreds of youth ambassadors to help get the message out to their peers.

A regional effort led by seven Bay Area public health departments, Crushing the Curve, has a similar aim.

Brandi House, 19, will participate in both programs as a youth leader. She said many of her acquaintances and coworkers have been going to parties during the pandemic, not believing the virus is serious or that they will get sick. She hopes to help dispel such attitudes.

“The message I’d like to put out for young people is to know this is real,” said House, of Richmond. “I know a lot of people not believing COVID is real. I know people that are still going to parties and stuff. I’m like, ‘Why are you going to parties during this time?’

“There’s a lot of people that have been getting sick and passing from it. That’s one message I want to get out.”

SF Chronicle report on contact tracing in Bay Area – “Solano County did not respond”

Bay Area’s contact tracers struggle amid coronavirus surge

San Francisco Chronicle, by Carolyn Said, July 20, 2020
In a photo taken with a telephoto lens, beachgoers gather at Robert W. Crown Memorial Beach on Tuesday, May 26, 2020, in Alameda, Calif. Most people maintained at least fifteen feet between groups.
In a photo taken with a telephoto lens, beachgoers gather at Robert W. Crown Memorial Beach on Tuesday, May 26, 2020, in Alameda, Calif.  Most people maintained at least fifteen feet between groups. Photo: Noah Berger / Special to The Chronicle

Contact tracing — finding and notifying everyone who has had close contact with a person infected with the coronavirus — is key to stemming the pandemic. Once people learn they’ve spent time near someone who had the virus, they can get tested themselves and quarantine so they don’t infect others.

Bay Area county health departments ramped up in April and May to handle the laborious process, most of it armchair detective work by phone and email, not the high-tech surveillance some in Silicon Valley originally envisioned. But the recent surge in cases has made the task much harder, because there are more people to contact and because it takes longer to be tested and then get the results.

Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties all fall short of their goal of doing case investigations for 90% of the people who test positive, and then reaching out to 90% of the folks those people had close contact with while they were infectious.

Napa, Sonoma and  Solano  counties did not respond to requests for information.

When it comes to reaching contacts of the people who tested positive, the counties range from 70% to 80%, except for Contra Costa, which reaches only 26% of those who had contact with infected people, and Marin, which reached only 46% (its numbers are older). Still, those numbers are far better than those in New York and some other states.

“Obviously we want as many as possible because that’s where you get the most bang for your buck,” said Dr. George Rutherford, an infectious diseases expert at UCSF who spearheaded San Francisco’s contact-tracing program. But modeling shows that even reaching 43% of infected people’s contacts provides some disease suppression. “I think the spread would be worse without” contact tracing, even though it hasn’t reached its potential, he said.

Contra Costa County could not say why it is so far below the Bay Area norm, especially since it is closer than Alameda and San Mateo counties to meeting its contact tracing staff goal.

“We’ve been grappling with it,” said Erika Jenssen, deputy director of Contra Costa Health Services. “To do effective contact tracing, we need timely lab results for tests, adequate staffing and to partner with the community.”

She pointed to delayed test results as a major obstacle. While the median turnaround time in the county is four days, many results come in as late as 10 days after testing — by which time a person may not longer be infectious.

And it’s not just results that take a while: In parts of the Bay Area, some people must wait a week or more for a testing slot to open up.

The case investigations — interviews with newly diagnosed people — shed light on how the virus has spread since shelter-in-place orders were eased.

“We are seeing more people who were at some kind of gathering; that’s a common source of exposure,” Jenssen said. Contra Costa County investigators found that 18% of those who tested positive had attended large gatherings in the previous 15 days, while 17% had been to in-person workplaces. About 20% had visited restaurants, supermarkets and other stores.

Signs encourage wearing a mask at Lake Merritt in Oakland in June.
Signs encourage wearing a mask at Lake Merritt in Oakland in June. Photo: Carlos Avila Gonzalez / The Chronicle
Even counties that have maintained fairly high contact tracing numbers say they struggle with the surge.