Tag Archives: Benicia Industrial Park

Dirk Fulton: Report on Benicia concerns before Assembly hearing in Sacramento

[Comment from BenIndy editor: We previously issued a call for Benicians to attend an August 20 hearing before a Joint California Assembly Committee in Sacramento to consider the legislation known as the “Petroleum Market Stabilization” bill. Several Benicia residents attended, including Dirk Fulton, who offers the following reflections. – RS]

California Assembly holds hearing on Gov. Newsom’s hot mess of a “Petroleum Market Stabilization” bill

By Dirk Fulton, August 21, 2025

My reflections on the 6 hour hearing yesterday:

The legislature is clearly following the recommendations of the California Energy Commission (CEC) at Gov. Newsom’s request. CEC Vice-Chair Gunda made a lengthy presentation and answered followup questions from legislators. Late in the hearing, an Assemblyman from Los Angeles asked if the State was considering “taking over” the refinery. Gunda responded saying that Valero is in private talks with the CEC and all options are being explored to keep Valero open. One option could of course include a joint venture structure between Valero & the State. Oil companies do this all the time.

This alternative would be a horrible result for Benicia from both a regulatory and refinery closure standpoint.

Another Assemblyman commented that if exports of California refined product to Nevada and Arizona were reduced, there would be a 10% surplus in capacity of refined product thereby eliminating the prospect of any California gas shortages following a Valero closure. There was also discussion of increasing imports which is doable, and subsidizing further EV usage thereby reducing demand for gasoline, which would allow Valero to close without causing gasoline prices to spike.

Importantly, a longtime energy consultant to Citizens for a Better Environment and now a consultant to the CEC released a study yesterday morning demonstrating that as the PBF Martinez refinery returns to production (closed since the February fire), its production will offset any loss of production from a Valero closure.

A lobbyist from the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA) was allowed to present for twenty minutes and respond to questions for another twenty. He stated that he meets regularly with the CEC to advocate for Valero remaining open. He seemed to have strong influence over the CEC and legislators including Benicia’s representative Lori Wilson.

Mayor Young’s 10 minutes of testimony did not help us regarding getting Valero closed. He basically wants the refinery to remain open for at least five more years-which basically means forever. He did NOT address our high cancer or asthma rates or address ongoing health risks to residents.

My takeaways:

    • Refining capacity is manageable. It can be maintained at acceptable limits following a Valero closure so gas prices don’t spike.
    • A State/Valero venture would be horrible for Benicia as increased regulation would be difficult and the refinery likely would never close. This seems to be a WSPA idea and comes from the Donald Trump playbook , e.g., what Trump has our federal government doing with Intel – a joint-venture-like concept where USA is contributing capital to sustain Intel Corp and receiving equity and profits in return.
    • Our best strategy to discourage the State and Valero going forward and to discourage any potential buyer is the local Polluters Pay Excise tax ballot measure. A $1 per barrel tax would substantially diminish refinery profit thereby operating as a disincentive. The Richmond example shows it works. Mayor Young told me in a hallway conversation that he supports the idea, and has received advice from City Attorney Ben Stock this week that it is legal.
    • We need a local citizens committee to be formed to lobby for this proposal.

Dirk Fulton


Read more Dirk Fulton on the Benicia Independent


Dirk Fulton, Benicia

Dirk Fulton, Lifelong Resident & former Solano County Planning Commissioner, Vice Mayor, City Councilman & School Board President
For More Information visit: www.greatdayforbenicia.com

Dirk Fulton: A Great Day for Benicia – Making Polluters Pay

Valero fire 5/5/2025 | photo by Larnie Fox

AS THE CITY & STATE WORK TO KEEP VALERO OPEN, A LOCAL REFINERY “POLLUTERS PAY” EXCISE TAX IS REQUIRED TO PROTECT US

By Dirk Fulton, August 17, 2025

URGENT: STATE ACTION & LEGISLATIVE HEARING THIS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20

We know Governor Newsom, the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the legislature are seeking to keep the Valero Benicia refinery open. Our city leaders have been complicit with the State in this effort. In fact, the CEC is acting as a broker to find a replacement operator and the Governor is sponsoring legislation to cut refinery regulations as an enticement to attract a successor.

A hearing is set for 1:30 PM this Wednesday (8/20) before a Joint State Assembly Committee in Sacramento to consider the legislation, known as the ‘Petroleum Market Stabilization” bill. Benicia residents are encouraged to attend the hearing and express their opposition. A sign-up form is here. Further info and talking points will be provided once you’ve signed up. And please reach out to action@sunflower-alliance.org if you can give a ride on Wednesday or want to join some others on the train.

OUR HIGH CANCER RATES REQUIRE CITY ACTION

Benicia residents Dr. Richard Fleming and columnist Steve Golub have separately published articles documenting that Benicia’s rates of cancer are much higher than Solano County and the State of California. The rates are astonishing:

    • Our breast cancer rate is 94% higher than the California rate.
    • Our prostate cancer rate is 70% higher than the State’s.
    • Our rate of lung cancer is 44% higher than the State rate.

Valero’s emissions routinely exceed Air Board limits and over a 16-year period ending last November, the emissions exceeded Air Board limits by 360%, often constituting 2.7 metric tons of hazardous pollution daily. Extensive medical studies have found a well-documented connection between residents living in refinery communities and higher cancer rates.

A “POLLUTERS PAY” EXCISE TAX CAN BE USED TO PROTECT US

Unless citizens’ efforts in opposition to the Governor’s bill are successful on Wednesday, it appears likely that the State will cause the Valero refinery to remain open indefinitely, perhaps through a new operator.

The Benicia City Council, accordingly, should immediately take action to place a refinery $1-per-barrel excise tax (“Polluters Pay Tax”) on the ballot. Only a simple majority vote is needed for passage. The tax would apply to all feedstock refined at Valero’s two refineries, including product refined elsewhere and placed in storage tanks at the refinery, and would generate $50-$70 million per year for a 50-year period. The tax proceeds can support pollution-fighting services like real-time extensive air monitoring, air filters for schools, advanced health and safety monitoring for neighborhoods, and environmental oversight and cleanup. Importantly, the tax can be crafted as an excise tax—targeted specifically at local refining, not a broad manufacturing or consumer tax.

In mid-2024, the Richmond City Council unanimously approved placing a refinery excise tax ballot measure on the ballot targeted at the Chevron refinery. Chevron opposed the proposal which led to a settlement on June 18,2024 as follows: Chevron agreed to pay the city of Richmond $550 million structured as $50 million annually the first five years, and $60 million for the next five years in exchange for the city removing the tax proposal from the ballot.

Our Benicia City Council has a duty to protect us from refinery pollution and should move forward expeditiously to place a similar $1-per-barrel excise tax on the ballot. Should the City Council once again fail to act, residents can circulate Initiative petitions, gather signatures and cause the tax to be placed on the ballot in June 2026. Hopefully, our city leaders will do the right thing and the Initiative process will not be necessary.


Read Dirk Fulton’s series, A Great Day for Benicia


Dirk Fulton, Benicia

Dirk Fulton, Lifelong Resident & former Solano County Planning Commissioner, Vice Mayor, City Councilman & School Board President
For More Information visit: www.greatdayforbenicia.com

Dirk Fulton: A Great Day for Benicia, Part Four

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL

BENICIA IS AT A CROSSROAD: WILL YOU TAKE ACTION TO SAFEGUARD OUR HEALTH BY WORKING TO CLOSE VALERO NEXT APRIL OR LET THE STATE DECIDE OUR FATE?

By Dirk Fulton, June 26, 2025

OUR ALARMING CANCER RATES

Valero oil refinery in Benicia CA. | Lea Suzuki/S.F. Chronicle

There are several convincing reasons for the refinery to close as soon as possible. The most compelling is the significant adverse impact of Valero’s emissions on our health.

Benicia residents Dr. Richard Fleming and Stephen Golub have separately published well-researched articles describing that Benicia’s rates of cancer are much higher than Solano County and the State of California based on several data sources available from the County and the State.

I have many friends, neighbors and family members in town who are fighting cancer or have suffered from cancer. I imagine many of you do as well. The data is shocking:

    • Our rate of lung cancer appears to be 44% higher than the California rate.
    • Our prostate cancer rate appears to be 70% higher than the state’s.
    • Our breast cancer rate appears to be 94% higher than the state rate.

Thanks to the Air Board enforcement action against Valero, we now know that the refinery knowingly polluted us with highly toxic carcinogens over a recent 16-year period. The contaminants included known cancer-causing compounds like benzene, toluene, methylbenzene and xylene. The wrongful emissions exceeded Air Board standards by 360% and often constituted 2.7 metric tons of hazardous pollution daily.

Extensive medical studies from the United States (e.g., University of Texas Medical Branch) and internationally (e.g., Taiwan and Jordan) have found a well- documented connection between residents living in refinery communities and higher cancer rates. Benicia residents are unmistakably in harm’s way.

Some offer counter arguments that the above-described cancer data is “cherry-picked”, but they fail to offer any evidence or proof to support their claim. Until data is presented which indicates Benicia’s cancer rates are “normal”, the fact stands that the available data from the County and State shows that our cancer incidence is abnormally high.

THE CITY HAS A DUTY TO PROTECT US

The City of Benicia has an unconditional duty to protect our health and safety from toxic pollution no matter where the threat comes from. This is a basic obligation of local government that arises under its constitutionally guaranteed “police powers” to protect the health, safety and welfare of its community. The Industrial Safety Ordinance enacted by the City that was fought for tirelessly by community activists and opposed vigorously by Valero is a great start, but more action is needed. The recently established private “task forces” which lack formal public input and have no timetable for city action are not going to safeguard us from Valero’s cancer-causing pollution. If the city fails to act more broadly, it is exposing itself to potential liability for mass tort claims should Valero remain operating past its stated closure date of April 2026, as city leadership is now fully aware of Valero’s carcinogenic emissions, extensive record of violations and Benicia’s high cancer rates.

Valero fire 5/5/2025 | Larnie Fox

A summary of Valero’s environ-mental violations and penalties since 2003 clearly demonstrates the need for urgent action:

    • 2003-2005 EPA violations- $97,940.00
    • 2011-2015 Bay Area Air Board violations- $122,500.00
    • 2014-2016 EPA violations-$157,800.00
    • 2016 Bay Area Air Board violations- $249,000.00
    • 2017 Bay Area Air Board violations-$345,000.00 $191,500.00 settlements
    • 2021 Cal OSHA violations- $528,750.00
    • 2023 EPA violations-$1,224,000.00.00
    • 2024 CARB & Bay Area Air Board violations-$82,000,000.00
    • 2025 Bay Area Air Board violations pending (refinery fire)-$?

This astonishing record of chronic violations cries out for our city government to act to safeguard us from further harm, as the almost Eighty-Five Million Dollars ($85,000,000.00) in fines has not altered Valero’s conduct.

ACTIONS THE CITY CAN TAKE IMMEDIATELY

Benicia Mayor Steve Young, Vice Mayor Macenski, Councilmembers Birdseye, Largaespada, Scott.

The Mayor and City Council should act right away as follows:

    • Lobby Governor Newsom, the California Commission Energy and our legislative representatives to close the refinery according to the legal notice by Valero establishing an April 2026 Closure date without exception or further delay.
    •  Inform Valero that if they fail to close as scheduled, the city will exercise its police powers to:
      • Declare Valero a public nuisance and seek injunctions to abate violations and impose local penalties. The City of Torrance took such action and successfully declared Mobil Oil’s refinery a public nuisance in court after an explosion and fire.
      • Use municipal code enforcement including the newly adopted ISO to fine and/or shut down unsafe operations.
      • Rezone the refinery footprint area to phase out heavy industrial uses creating a Non-Conforming Use allowing the city to stop oil refining should the refinery operations cease operations for 120 days or longer. The City of Torrance has adopted this approach and amended its zoning ordinance to create a framework for phasing out non-conforming hazardous uses like oil refineries.
      • Impose a refinery tax such as the $1-per-barrel refinery excise tax proposed by the City of Richmond regarding the Chevron refinery. Chevron settled with Richmond prior to a public vote agreeing to pay $550 million over 10 years.

 TRAVIS AFB FALLACY & MISLEADING FINANCIAL DATA SUPPLIED BY THE CITY DO NOT SUPPORT DELAYING CLOSURE

Open Vjo 4/30/2025, KWright_USAF

The information about Travis AFB’s viability if Valero closes put forth by the city in citizen-paid, direct mail pieces is misleading. A Valero closure in April 2026 will not cause a Travis AFB closure when true facts are examined. This has been confirmed to me by a very high-ranking federal official. Travis AFB has been in operation since 1942 supplying military support during WWII, the Korean War and the Vietnam War- for over 27 years before Valero began supplying it with jet fuel. Extensive energy pipelines run under the bay from northern California to the air base, which served Travis and can be utilized again.

Additionally, the projected revenue loss from a Valero closure has been overstated by millions of dollars because current income such as property tax remains payable and other losses can be replaced with alternative revenue streams. (I have set forth these items in detail in prior articles.) Such alternatives include income from increased residential real property taxes, excess water revenues, port fees, development fees and Air Board settlement monies ear-marked for Benicia.

A GREAT DAY FOR BENICIA CAN STILL BE ACHIEVED

The risks of cancer and related social costs of having a 1960s-era oil refinery dominate our town can be avoided. I hope that our city leaders and citizens embrace Valero’s offer to close next April and unite to “pull out all the stops” to make sure it does shut down. Only then can we undertake a comprehensive site clean-up and establish a promising post-refinery future.  By seizing this rare opportunity, we can restore our clean air and achieve an image of Benicia as a healthy, historic community with a small-town atmosphere, inviting downtown, safe neighborhoods, and great schools.


Read Dirk Fulton’s series, A Great Day for Benicia


Dirk Fulton, Benicia

Dirk Fulton, Lifelong Resident & former Solano County Planning Commissioner, Vice Mayor, City Councilman & School Board President
For More Information visit: www.greatdayforbenicia.com

Dirk Fulton: A Great Day for Benicia, Part Three

VALERO: City Sponsored 3-Year Delay of Closure Endangers Our Health & Promotes Risk of Benicia Remaining a Refinery Town Forever

By Dirk Fulton, May 28, 2025

Dirk Fulton, Benicia

The long history of fires, explosions, shelter-in-place orders, and non-stop, cancer-causing toxic air emissions demand a Valero closure in April 2026 as announced. No later.

Using financial scare tactics to delay closure until 2029 as advocated by city officials is unjust to residents and plays into the hands of Valero, which remains vague about its plans.

PROLONGING HEALTH DANGERS

Clearly, the refinery is a bad neighbor. This is demonstrated by the $82 million Air Board fine recently imposed on Valero for the 16 years of secret, toxic emissions it spewed on our town.

We now know that Valero knowingly pollutes our air with toxins 24/7, measuring as much as 2.7 metric tons daily, which incredibly is 360% over Air Board maximums. There is a worrisome correlation between Valero’s troubling refinery operations and high asthma rates among Benicia’s children and high cancer rates, especially lung cancers, among our residents. Waiting until 2029 to regain clean air and protect our health cannot be justified.

WRONGFUL SCARE TACTICS 

The scare tactics used by the city to promote a three year closure delay are overstated and misleading. As I have set forth in prior articles, the largest income to the city from Valero is approximately $8 million in real property taxes. These taxes will not immediately cease upon refinery closure as its developable land and infrastructure improvements retain high inherent value and will increase once homes are constructed along the East Second Street corridor.

Several additional revenue streams are also available upon closure to offset any financial loss. These include:

    • Years-long, multi-million dollar residential and commercial development fees;
    • income from the city’s recapture of Valero’s fifty percent (50%) allocation of our domestic water supply;
    • “ Bridge to the Future” funds from the $82 million Air Board Valero settlement, of which $58 million is assigned to Benicia to mitigate damages from years of pollution;
    • a port tariff cargo fee similar to those earned by other California port cities, such as Richmond, Oakland, Los Angeles and Long Beach, which could measure $13 million annually;
    • increased sales and hotel (TOT) taxes as tourism blossoms;
    • and increased real property taxes on existing homes as values appreciate once the stigma of being a “refinery town” is alleviated.

Accordingly, the city’s leaders should stop spreading bad information.

EXTENDED DELAYS HURT CHANCE TO SHUT DOWN REFINERY– POTENTIALLY FOREVER 

Valero’s future remains unclear and there are reports it is lobbying Governor Newsom to ease environmental rules. The city-advocated three-year delay in closure plays to Valero’s advantage and, conversely, to the detriment of Benicia residents. There are three negative outcomes that a multi-year delay fosters:

    1. Valero can change its mind, whether or not it receives regulatory concessions from the state and continue to operate the refinery indefinitely. This result is in line with statements by a former Valero CEO who publicly stated that his company’s goal was “to keep Valero Benicia open as the last refinery operating in Northern California”.
    2. Valero can sell to another refinery operator, perhaps at a discounted price, which can decide to operate the refinery indefinitely. This result is like Shell Oil’s recent sale of the Martinez refinery to PBF, a shell entity controlled by a private equity group. This has led to one environmental disaster after another, severely harming that community.
    3. Valero can repurpose the refinery as another petrochemical type of operation. This result continues the prospect of the facility being an ongoing major polluter and pushes multi-million-dollar environmental cleanup down the road indefinitely.

PLANNING FOR BENICIA’S FUTURE WITHOUT A REFINERY SHOULD OCCUR IMMEDIATELY AND BE TRANSPARENT

The price is too high for the city to delay the closure of its major polluter for three additional years. Rather than “kicking the can down the road”, risking our health and the chance to close the refinery for good, the city should instead immediately hold community public hearings subject to the Brown Open Meetings Act to create a vision for Benicia without a refinery. This contrasts with private “Task Force” meetings not open to public input or scrutiny that can drag on indefinitely.

Dirk Fulton, Lifelong Benicia resident
Former Solano County Planning Commissioner, Benicia Vice-Mayor, City Councilman & School Board President


Read Dirk Fulton’s series, A Great Day for Benicia