Category Archives: Derailment

Latest derailment: Brockville, Ontario

Repost rom The Toronto Star

Brockville train derailment ‘could have been a lot worse’

CN train skipped the tracks outside town, with empty tankers that carried only residue of jet fuel.
By: Jessica McDiarmid, July 10 2014
Cars lie all over the tracks outside Brockville, after an early-morning derailment on Thursday.
Cars lie all over the tracks outside Brockville, after an early-morning derailment on Thursday. Transportation Safety Board

The photos show a dozen black tank cars thrown from the rails and tossed to each side. Crushed vehicles spew from two automobile carriers; empty platform cars lie crippled in the grass beside the tracks.

The Canadian National freight train that skipped the rails in Brockville, Ont., early Thursday morning shut down the major rail artery east from Toronto, forcing passenger service Via Rail to cancel trains between Union Station and both Ottawa and Montreal. The company brought in buses to transport some 3,600 people booked to travel on the 29 trains scheduled for the day.

Local officials said the train was travelling at about 100 km/h when it careened off the tracks about 115 kilometres south of Ottawa. The 26-car derailment occurred beside a golf course on the western edge of the community of 40,000.

It’s an unpopulated area; there were no injuries.

The derailment happened just after 4 a.m. Thursday, said CN spokesperson Lindsay Fechyshyn. The train was eastbound when it jumped the tracks shortly before it would have entered the town, where the rails rub up against a hospital, schools and residential neighbourhoods.

“It could have been a lot worse than it was,” Elizabethtown-Kitley Township fire chief Jim Donovan told the local newspaper, the Recorder and Times.

Of the derailed cars, 13 were tankers that had carried highly flammable aviation fuel, but were currently empty.

“They’re not full, but they would have some residue,” said Fechyshyn. It didn’t appear there had been any leaks or spills, she said. Two of the cars were carrying automobiles, five were carrying carbon powder — commonly used in water filtration systems — and six were empty platform cars.

Fechyshyn added that it was too early to speculate on the cause of the derailment. The Transportation Safety Board (TSB) is investigating.

Coming just days after the sombre one-year anniversary of the catastrophic derailment in Lac-Megantic, which left 47 people dead and the town’s core decimated, the incident prompted a chorus of what-if’s among critics of Canada’s rail safety program and recent measures purported to improve it.

“It is only a matter of time before we see another Lac-Megantic,” said Michael Butler, a campaigner with the Council of Canadians who regularly blogs about rail safety issues. “I don’t feel this is hyperbole or alarmist … The nature of our railway industry — and its cargo — has changed, but the regulations which are supposed to be in place to protect our communities and environment seem to be stuck in the last century.”

According to TSB data, rail accidents are on the decline. But the materials involved in those accidents are changing, though precisely how remains murky.

Transport Canada has ordered rail companies to share historical, aggregate information with local emergency officials on the types of dangerous goods transported through their communities. But that data will only be released under a strict veil of secrecy.

In the GTA, which is traversed by both CN and CP main lines, residents and municipal politicians have protested, arguing that people who live alongside the tracks have the right to know what passes by their homes. A Star investigation found that, over two 12-hour periods alone, hundreds of tankers carrying crude oil, radioactive material and toxic chemicals trundled through Toronto.

Shipments of volatile crude oil have risen dramatically. Figures provided by Transport Canada, which regulates federal railroads, showed that nearly 128,000 carloads of crude moved in Canada in 2013, compared with about 53,000 the year before. In 2009, only 144 carloads of crude were shipped.

But it’s unclear what quantities of other dangerous goods — materials such as chlorine, ammunition, radioactive materials — are transported in the country.

Transport Canada previously told the Star that about 600,000 carloads of dangerous goods were moved by Canada’s two major carriers, Canadian National and Canadian Pacific, in 2013. But on Thursday the department wouldn’t provide yearly totals for the preceding four years, citing a Canada Transportation Act section that prohibits releasing statistics that could be related to an individual carrier because the information is “commercially sensitive.”

Earlier questions about particular types of dangerous goods were met with the same response.

In 2013, there were 1,067 accidents, slightly up from the 1,011 reported in 2012, according to the TSB. Dangerous goods were involved in 144 of those incidents, an increase from 119 the previous year, as well as from the five-year average of 133.

Seven accidents resulted in a dangerous-goods release, more than double the five-year average of three. Five of the seven were crude oil.

“This increase is concurrent with an increase in shipments of crude oil by rail,” the TSB notes in its annual statistical summary.

BizJournal: Why does North Dakota oil explode so much?

Repost from The Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal 

Why does North Dakota oil explode so much?

By Mark Reilly, Managing Editor- Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal – July 8, 2014

Oil-industry shortcuts made in the early days of the North Dakota oil boom have left the state awash with crude oil that’s so unstable many pipeline companies won’t ship it. Cue the exploding trains.

The Wall Street Journal reports that only one company in North Dakota has installed stabilizer equipment to remove explosive gases from the crude oil before transport. Federal regulations don’t call for such measures, but pipeline companies do, and that’s one reason why North Dakota oil is so often shipped by rail — and why oil trains have exploded so ferociously when they derail.

RELATED: Oil train tally: More than 40 per week into Minnesota

Now, faced with the prospect of an explosion in a populated area, regulators are reconsidering those rules. Industry groups have played down the danger, saying that train cars can handle the issue.

The Journal contrasts North Dakota with Texas, another region that’s seeing a boom in fracking-produced oil that’s possibly even more combustible. But in Texas, companies spent hundreds of millions of dollars to add stabilizing equipment and now ship it via pipeline with no trouble.

Montreal Gazette: Lac-Mégantic, One Year Later

Repost from The Montreal Gazette
[Editor: The Montreal Gazette offers a special section to mark the anniversary of the catastrophic crude by rail explosion in Canada, including a variety of intensely probing and sobering stories.  The LEAST we can do is respectfully remember – for MORE, we must take action in our own communities.  – RS]

Lac Megantic

Names etched in granite and in their hearts

Visitors read a monument to Lac-Mégantic’s 47 train disaster victims outside the Ste-Agnès church in the town, Sunday, July , 2014, after a mass to mark the first anniversary of the tragedy.  The mass was done as part of weekend activities to commemorate the accident.

The 12-foot slab of granite was ordered from a quarry in Asia, shortly after last summer’s disaster, and only after the families of the 47 dead in the tragedy had agreed: a monument should be erected.

Multimedia

Lac-Mégantic future plansINTERACTIVE: Lac-Mégantic before and after

See the proposed plans for Lac-Mégantic’s devastated former downtown and new commercial district…

LAC-MEGANTIC.: JULY 12, 2013-- A section of the train tracks near Lacourciere Street in Lac-MÈgantic, 216 kms east of Montreal, is pictured on Friday, July 12, 2013. There is speculation regarding the condition of the tracks the ill-fated train route ran along before the Saturday, July 6 train derailment disaster. (Justin Tang / THE GAZETTE) ORG XMIT: 47298WATCH: Our reporters’ vivid memories

Watch videos of a few of our reporters and photographers recounting some of the vivid memories they …

Lac-MéganticGALLERY: Lac-Mégantic one year later

Much has changed in Lac-Mégantic since last year’s tragedy, yet much has stayed the same. Here …

Latest Derailment: Whitecourt, Alberta, Canada

Repost from The Wall Street Journal

Two Oil-Tank Cars on Canadian National Train Derail in Rural Alberta

No Injuries or Fire Reported
By David George-Cosh  |  July 4, 2014

Two crude-carrying cars on a train operated by Canadian National Railway Ltd. derailed in central Alberta early Friday, according to the railway company and a local official. There were no reports of injuries or fire.

The 79-car train was carrying oil and forestry products when it derailed near Whitecourt, Alberta, about 125 miles northwest of Edmonton, capital of the oil-rich province, according to a spokesman with Canada’s Transportation Safety Board.

A CN spokeswoman said three other cars also left the tracks but contained paper and forest products.

The train, which originated in Whitecourt, was en route to a terminal in Edmonton when the cars left the track, according to Whitecourt fire chief Brian Wynn. Mr. Wynn said the train was carrying 81 cars.

The CN spokeswoman, Emily Hamer, said the company had contained “slight seepage” from a valve on one tank car but that both oil-carrying cars that derailed remained intact. She said the cause of the accident was being investigated, and that both derailed tank cars were currently on their side.

The incident comes just two days before the one-year anniversary of a deadly train derailment in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, in which a train carrying 72 cars of crude from the Bakken Shale slammed into the town’s downtown, killing 47 people.

Since then, other crude-by-rail derailments have occurred in Alabama, North Dakota, Lynchburg, Va., and elsewhere in Canada. Those occurred even as U.S. and Canadian regulators moved to toughen safety standards amid growing transport of oil by rail.

The TSB said it had dispatched an investigator to the site.

The train was headed southbound on a secondary main line where trains typically travel at slower speeds, Mr. Wynn said.