Benicia’s solar panels are broken. The fix is $480k

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: THE BENICIA BRIDGE
The following excellent reporting comes from Benicia’s newest award-winning journalism duo, Monica Vaughan and Laura López González. Their online publication is The Benicia Bridge. Learn more and subscribe to the newsletter here. Note that the story below is a highly important delvelopment for Benicia – first hand reporting on current City Council business, missing since the departure of the Benicia Herald’s Donna Beth Weilenman in 2015! – Roger Straw
A solar array by James Lemos pool provides shade and not much else until the system gets fixed. The City of Benicia owns 10 solar arrays that have fallen into disrepair. Photo by Monica Vaughan.

After “years of disrepair,” the City Council on Tuesday…

By Monica Vaughan, The Benicia Bridge, April  10, 2026

After “years of disrepair,” the City Council on Tuesday approved spending up to $1.6 million to fix and maintain the city’s aging solar panels for the next five years. There’s a caveat.

Background: The city has 10 solar arrays installed about 15 years ago to power a portion of city operations. Parts of the system have been broken for years, according to City Manager Mario Giuliani. The system of panels next to James Lemos Swim Center is completely down, for example. The only good they provide is shade until they’re fixed.

Giuliani stressed the need to get these fixed ASAP, saying  “we’re losing money just from the four sites that are off.” Together, the system produces about $770,000 worth of electricity a year.

“By the way,” Giuliani said, City Hall, the Clock Tower and the Police Department building are on collateral for the loan to cover the cost of construction of the arrays back in 2011, which the city continues to pay off every year.

The details: Council members approved a five-year contract with Opterra Energy Services to fix and maintain the city’s 10 solar panel systems. The first year’s work for one-time repairs and upgrades to get the system operating again will cost $480,000. The remaining expenses are for annual maintenance and additional services, if needed. The original contract was for $1.6 million, but the council voted to send it back to the company with edits to reduce costs.

Points of discussion:

  • Councilmember Lionel Largeosparda worked to cut costs, earning him the title “our contract nerd,” by Mayor Steve Young. The nerd successfully argued that some of the built-in annual markups in the contract were too high, like a 15% markup on materials. He admitted to “splitting hairs and nitpicking.”Ultimately the council agreed with him on those points and they voted to empower the city manager to make those requests to the company and get the deal done. He also wanted to reduce a $150,000-per-year set-aside that allows staff to approve repairs without needing to return to council for approval.Giuliani fought back.

“The only reason I’m having this pushback is because, again, we’re trying to solve something that has been broken for years, and this is a vehicle to do that, so we don’t repeat the mistake of letting something get in such disrepair that it’s going to cost $480,000 in year one,” Giuliani said.

  • Mayor Steve Young questioned the bid process used to pick the contractor. Instead of publishing a “request for proposals” (RFP for bureaucrats in the know), the city used a third-party vendor, Omnia Partners, that released an RFP and did vetting in 2023. Kelly Ferguson with Opterra Energy made the case in person. “We are uniquely qualified for this contract because, actually, our predecessor company built the systems, and we have stockpiles of equipment, which obviously, now you can’t get on the market.”

Story by Monica Vaughan of The Benicia Bridge.
Subscribe to the Bridge newsletter here.
Reach out to the Benicia Bridge via their About page.

Back to top.