AN OPEN LETTER TO THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
BENICIA IS AT A CROSSROAD: WILL YOU TAKE ACTION TO SAFEGUARD OUR HEALTH BY WORKING TO CLOSE VALERO NEXT APRIL OR LET THE STATE DECIDE OUR FATE?
By Dirk Fulton, June 26, 2025
OUR ALARMING CANCER RATES

There are several convincing reasons for the refinery to close as soon as possible. The most compelling is the significant adverse impact of Valero’s emissions on our health.
Benicia residents Dr. Richard Fleming and Stephen Golub have separately published well-researched articles describing that Benicia’s rates of cancer are much higher than Solano County and the State of California based on several data sources available from the County and the State.
I have many friends, neighbors and family members in town who are fighting cancer or have suffered from cancer. I imagine many of you do as well. The data is shocking:
-
- Our rate of lung cancer appears to be 44% higher than the California rate.
- Our prostate cancer rate appears to be 70% higher than the state’s.
- Our breast cancer rate appears to be 94% higher than the state rate.
Thanks to the Air Board enforcement action against Valero, we now know that the refinery knowingly polluted us with highly toxic carcinogens over a recent 16-year period. The contaminants included known cancer-causing compounds like benzene, toluene, methylbenzene and xylene. The wrongful emissions exceeded Air Board standards by 360% and often constituted 2.7 metric tons of hazardous pollution daily.
Extensive medical studies from the United States (e.g., University of Texas Medical Branch) and internationally (e.g., Taiwan and Jordan) have found a well- documented connection between residents living in refinery communities and higher cancer rates. Benicia residents are unmistakably in harm’s way.
Some offer counter arguments that the above-described cancer data is “cherry-picked”, but they fail to offer any evidence or proof to support their claim. Until data is presented which indicates Benicia’s cancer rates are “normal”, the fact stands that the available data from the County and State shows that our cancer incidence is abnormally high.
THE CITY HAS A DUTY TO PROTECT US
The City of Benicia has an unconditional duty to protect our health and safety from toxic pollution no matter where the threat comes from. This is a basic obligation of local government that arises under its constitutionally guaranteed “police powers” to protect the health, safety and welfare of its community. The Industrial Safety Ordinance enacted by the City that was fought for tirelessly by community activists and opposed vigorously by Valero is a great start, but more action is needed. The recently established private “task forces” which lack formal public input and have no timetable for city action are not going to safeguard us from Valero’s cancer-causing pollution. If the city fails to act more broadly, it is exposing itself to potential liability for mass tort claims should Valero remain operating past its stated closure date of April 2026, as city leadership is now fully aware of Valero’s carcinogenic emissions, extensive record of violations and Benicia’s high cancer rates.

A summary of Valero’s environ-mental violations and penalties since 2003 clearly demonstrates the need for urgent action:
-
- 2003-2005 EPA violations- $97,940.00
- 2011-2015 Bay Area Air Board violations- $122,500.00
- 2014-2016 EPA violations-$157,800.00
- 2016 Bay Area Air Board violations- $249,000.00
- 2017 Bay Area Air Board violations-$345,000.00 $191,500.00 settlements
- 2021 Cal OSHA violations- $528,750.00
- 2023 EPA violations-$1,224,000.00.00
- 2024 CARB & Bay Area Air Board violations-$82,000,000.00
- 2025 Bay Area Air Board violations pending (refinery fire)-$?
This astonishing record of chronic violations cries out for our city government to act to safeguard us from further harm, as the almost Eighty-Five Million Dollars ($85,000,000.00) in fines has not altered Valero’s conduct.
ACTIONS THE CITY CAN TAKE IMMEDIATELY

The Mayor and City Council should act right away as follows:
-
- Lobby Governor Newsom, the California Commission Energy and our legislative representatives to close the refinery according to the legal notice by Valero establishing an April 2026 Closure date without exception or further delay.
- Inform Valero that if they fail to close as scheduled, the city will exercise its police powers to:
- Declare Valero a public nuisance and seek injunctions to abate violations and impose local penalties. The City of Torrance took such action and successfully declared Mobil Oil’s refinery a public nuisance in court after an explosion and fire.
- Use municipal code enforcement including the newly adopted ISO to fine and/or shut down unsafe operations.
- Rezone the refinery footprint area to phase out heavy industrial uses creating a Non-Conforming Use allowing the city to stop oil refining should the refinery operations cease operations for 120 days or longer. The City of Torrance has adopted this approach and amended its zoning ordinance to create a framework for phasing out non-conforming hazardous uses like oil refineries.
- Impose a refinery tax such as the $1-per-barrel refinery excise tax proposed by the City of Richmond regarding the Chevron refinery. Chevron settled with Richmond prior to a public vote agreeing to pay $550 million over 10 years.
TRAVIS AFB FALLACY & MISLEADING FINANCIAL DATA SUPPLIED BY THE CITY DO NOT SUPPORT DELAYING CLOSURE

The information about Travis AFB’s viability if Valero closes put forth by the city in citizen-paid, direct mail pieces is misleading. A Valero closure in April 2026 will not cause a Travis AFB closure when true facts are examined. This has been confirmed to me by a very high-ranking federal official. Travis AFB has been in operation since 1942 supplying military support during WWII, the Korean War and the Vietnam War- for over 27 years before Valero began supplying it with jet fuel. Extensive energy pipelines run under the bay from northern California to the air base, which served Travis and can be utilized again.
Additionally, the projected revenue loss from a Valero closure has been overstated by millions of dollars because current income such as property tax remains payable and other losses can be replaced with alternative revenue streams. (I have set forth these items in detail in prior articles.) Such alternatives include income from increased residential real property taxes, excess water revenues, port fees, development fees and Air Board settlement monies ear-marked for Benicia.
A GREAT DAY FOR BENICIA CAN STILL BE ACHIEVED
The risks of cancer and related social costs of having a 1960s-era oil refinery dominate our town can be avoided. I hope that our city leaders and citizens embrace Valero’s offer to close next April and unite to “pull out all the stops” to make sure it does shut down. Only then can we undertake a comprehensive site clean-up and establish a promising post-refinery future. By seizing this rare opportunity, we can restore our clean air and achieve an image of Benicia as a healthy, historic community with a small-town atmosphere, inviting downtown, safe neighborhoods, and great schools.
Read Dirk Fulton’s series, A Great Day for Benicia

Dirk Fulton, Lifelong Resident & former Solano County Planning Commissioner, Vice Mayor, City Councilman & School Board President
For More Information visit: www.greatdayforbenicia.com
You must be logged in to post a comment.