Note from the NorCal ACLU – Solano Chapter, co-led by Kris Oyota Kelley and Vallejo mayoral candidate Andrea Sorce:
This morning, California Attorney General Rob Bonta held a press conference to announce a stipulated judgment (consent decree) with the Vallejo Police Department.
This agreement compels the City of Vallejo to implement long-overdue reforms and establishes an independent court-supervised monitor to ensure progress. It will not solve all of our police accountability issues, but it is a major step in the right direction for public safety in Vallejo.
We appreciate everyone who signed the petition and will keep you updated as our efforts progress. The ACLU NorCal Criminal Justice team will be investing significant resources in Vallejo going forward, and we will continue to push for the remainder of our petition demands.
[Note from BenIndy: There is still a lot of work to do – please sign the petition by clicking this link. ]
Attorney General Bonta Announces Stipulated Judgment with the Vallejo Police Department to Strengthen Accountability, Police Policies and Practices
Sunday, October 15, 2023
[Images added by BenIndy]
VALLEJO – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced that the California Department of Justice (DOJ) has entered into a stipulated judgment with the city of Vallejo and the Vallejo Police Department (VPD) regarding reforms to VPD’s policies and practices. The stipulated judgment continues and expands upon the reform work started under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the DOJ and VPD. The agreement announced today resolves DOJ’s complaint alleging the VPD engaged in a pattern and practice of unconstitutional conduct. As part of the agreement, the city of Vallejo and VPD will undertake a comprehensive set of actions — to be led by an Oversight and Reform Evaluator — to promote public safety, reduce unlawful uses of force, eliminate racial and identity disparities, strengthen accountability systems, continue to increase support for officers, and protect the statutory and constitutional rights of the people of Vallejo.
“Maintaining trust between our law enforcement and the communities they serve is a foundational part of public safety,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Today’s agreement with the city of Vallejo and its police department is another important step toward correcting injustices, building trust, and enhancing public safety for the people of Vallejo. We cannot afford to be complacent. The reforms laid out in the agreement are needed and necessary to continue healing the relationship between law enforcement and the community. It’s past time the people of Vallejo have a police department that listens and guarantees that their civil rights are protected. My office is committed to staying engaged, working collaboratively with VPD and the city and ensuring a fair, thorough, and transparent process.”
“The City of Vallejo is encouraged by the progress made to date by our staff and the Department. We are optimistic about the continuation of our collaboration with the California Department of Justice and its team in the next phase of this important work,” said Vallejo Mayor Robert McConnell. “We have made significant progress but there is still more to do. The City Council is unanimously committed to seeing our efforts through to conclusion. It is the goal of the City of Vallejo and the VPD to continue to build on the progress made to date, to strengthen our relationships and advance our efforts to build trust with the community.”
“The Vallejo Police Department is committed to the completion of the remaining original recommendations and the additional recommendations under the new Agreement,” said Vallejo Police Department Interim Chief Jason Ta. “Improvements will be made to new and existing policies and procedures, which we are confident will increase accountability, efficiency, transparency, and community partnerships while at the same time improving relationships with the public and building mutual trust and respect from the community we serve.”
“This Agreement is a continuation of the reform process Vallejo Police Department started three years ago,” said Vallejo City Manager Michael Malone. “City management and Vallejo Police Department are committed to engaging the community and dedicating the resources needed to ensure this ongoing effort is successful within the terms of our new Agreement.”
“During the past 3 years of the City’s collaborative agreement with the California Department of Justice we have fostered a positive working relationship that has produced significant results,” said Vallejo City Attorney Veronica Nebb. “Our work is not complete and we look forward to continuing our joint efforts with the California Department of Justice for the benefit of the community, the Department and the City.”
On June 5, 2020, DOJ, the city of Vallejo, and VPD entered into a MOU for VPD to institute a comprehensive modernized policing plan that included implementing 45 reform recommendations made by VPD’s expert consultants, as well as additional review from DOJ to expand upon and add any additional recommendations needed to modernize VPD’s current policies and practices, assist with implementation of the recommendations, and independently evaluate VPD’s compliance with the recommendations. The California Department of Justice’s (DOJ) decision to enter into an MOU with VPD to reform its policing came in light of several high-profile uses of force, including a number of officer-involved shootings.
When the MOU expired on June 5, 2023, VPD had achieved substantial compliance with 20 out of the 45 agreed-upon recommendations. During the review of VPD’s systems and practices under the MOU, DOJ concluded that VPD failed to uniformly and adequately enforce the law, based in part, because of defective or inadequate policies, practices, and procedures. DOJ is currently seeking a judgment with court oversight requiring VPD and the city of Vallejo to implement the remaining reforms, and to implement additional reforms addressing civilian complaints, bias-free policing, stops, searches, seizures and arrest, and ongoing oversight of these reforms.
The parties have agreed on a comprehensive five-year plan to address the numerous areas that need improvement and modernization to bring VPD into alignment with contemporary best practices and ensure constitutional policing. VPD will implement the remaining recommendations that have not been completed from the 45 Recommendations contained in the May 2020 report titled “Vallejo Police Department: Independent Assessment of Operations, Internal Review Systems and Agency Culture” (“2020 Recommendations”). Additionally, under the agreement VPD will implement additional recommendations, including to:
Address unreasonable force by holding officers and supervisors accountable for not identifying, adequately investigating, or addressing force that is unreasonable or otherwise contrary to VPD policy; and refer uses of force that may violate law or VPD’s use of force policy to their Professional Standards Division (internal affairs) for further investigation or review.
Enhance, promote, and strengthen partnerships within the community, to continue engaging constructively with the community to ensure collaborative problem-solving and bias-free policing, and to increase transparency and community confidence in VPD.
Utilize its Chief’s Advisory Board (CAB) and the Police Oversight and Accountability Commission (POAC), to continue to develop and amend significant policies that impact the community, including to its use of force policies, community-policing strategy and policies, bias-free policing policies, and civilian complaint policies.
Develop a policy that defines and limits the use of pretextual stops.
Enhance and revise training with respect to investigatory stops, reiterating that race, color, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, gender identity, disability, or sexual orientation are not to be used as a factor in establishing reasonable suspicion or probable cause, except as part of actual and credible descriptions of a specific suspect.
Prohibit officers from conducting consent searches during consensual encounters. Officers may not conduct a consent search after detaining a subject unless an officer reasonably suspects that the subject has contraband or evidence related to that detention, and the consent must be documented on body camera footage or a signed consent form.
Ensure stops, searches, and seizures comply with the law, as part of an effective overall crime prevention strategy that does not contribute to counterproductive tension with the community.
Commit to providing bias-free services and enforcing laws in a way that is professional, nondiscriminatory, fair, and equitable.
Work with the Evaluator to develop a policy and protocol for responding to calls involving a person in mental health crisis or suffering from a mental health disability. The policy and protocol will include utilizing professional civilian staff, who are trained professionals in responding to mental health crises, to respond when appropriate and available.
Develop and implement policies, guidelines, and training to ensure all supervisors and managers:
Exercise appropriate supervisory oversight
Conduct objective and impartial investigations
Are held accountable for meeting agency standards and expectations
Engage with and listen to community feedback
Incorporate community feedback when able and appropriate
Develop and evaluate policing strategies and tactics reflective of contemporary best community policing practices
Conduct an ongoing audit of incidentswhere an officer points a firearm at a member of the public or brandishes a firearm in the presence of a member of the public to ensure that its officers are not drawing a firearm solely based on the mere existence of a potential risk (e.g., public contact, pedestrian/traffic stop).
A copy of the stipulated judgment is available here, and a copy of the complaint is available here.
Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) blasted Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) in an impassioned speech nominating Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) for Speaker on the House floor Tuesday.
“A vote today to make the architect of a nationwide abortion ban, a vocal election denier and an insurrection insider to the Speaker of this house would be a terrible message to the country and our allies,” Aguilar said, speaking of Jordan.
“Mr. Speaker, it would send an even more troubling message to our enemies, that the very people who would seek to undermine democracy are rewarded with positions of immense power,” he continued.
He ripped the GOP’s Speaker nominee for putting the country’s national security at risk, for his role in not certifying the 2020 election results and for launching “baseless investigations.” Jordan has been a leading figure in House impeachment probes into President Biden and his son Hunter.
“We’re talking about someone who has spent his entire career trying to hold our country back, putting our national security in danger, attempting government shutdown after government shutdown, wasting taxpayer dollars on baseless investigations with dead ends, authoring the very bill that would ban abortion nationwide without exceptions and inciting violence on this chamber,” Aguilar said.
“Even leaders of his own party have called him a legislative terrorist,” he added.
That monicker was once used by former Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to describe Jordan.
Aguilar also took aim at Jordan for voting no on a series of legislative action, including approving natural disaster relief in states after they were ravaged by hurricanes and wildfires. When listing out examples of what legislative action Jordan opposed, some Democrats appeared to join in chorus, saying “he said no” along with Aguilar.
“When the Mississippi River floods devastated the south and communities across state lines needed Congress to act, he said no,” he said. “When our veterans were suffering from disease and dying as a result of their service to our country and Congress passed a bipartisan solution, he said no.”
The California Democrat criticized the House for considering electing a member “who has not passed a single bill in 16 years.”
Aguilar called on the House to find a bipartisan way forward, accusing Republicans of throwing the House into “chaos” by failing to come to a consensus on a new Speaker. He said that they are gathered to vote on a new leader because “this hallowed chamber has been led to a breaking point by two dangerous forces — extremism and partisanship.”
He also urged those on both sides of the aisle to vote for Jeffries.
“Only Hakeem Jeffries can be trusted to keep his word. Only Hakeem Jeffries can lead us out of the chaos and towards the path of governance. It brings me immense pride to nominate our friend the Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries as Speaker,” he said.
Jordan, who narrowly secured the GOP nomination for Speaker in an internal vote last week, failed to clinch the 217 votes necessary on the first ballot. The vote was 200 for Jordan, 212 for Jeffries and 20 for other members. It’s unclear when a second vote might be held.
Amidst all the thoughts and feelings I had as 9/11 unfolded, the one that hit hardest was utter dismay at how incredibly cruel and savage people can be to each other.
That’s how I feel this week. Over 1,300 Israelis slaughtered – most of them civilians, many of them babies, children or elderly – with over 150 more taken hostage. Given America’s much larger population, this would be the equivalent of 50,000 people murdered here in a single terrorist attack, or seventeen 9/11s.
In the Hours and Days Ahead…
I won’t deeply delve right now into what’s going on and what’s to come as Israel takes the fight to Hamas in Gaza. There will be time enough for reasoned, complex or bitter debates about who’s to blame for that humanitarian calamity.
And, before seeking to see some light in this situation, I won’t deny that matters will most likely get much worse before they even have a chance of getting better.
More specifically: Within hours of my publishing this post, Israeli tanks and troops may be surging through Gaza. Or Lebanon-based Hezbollah, “the world’s most heavily armed non-state actor,” may open up a second front, raining many of its estimated 130,000 rockets down on Israel. Or the mounting violence and Palestinian deaths on the West Bank – 53 since October 7 – could explode into a full-fledged conflict there. Or some Palestinian citizens of Israel proper could rise up. Or the United States, or Iran, or both, could be drawn into the conflict.
Or all of the above.
Hamas Unveiled
Against this backdrop, why in the world speculate about something positive possibly springing from this horrific situation?
Because, despite the intense despair we all feel, we need to think about what happens to Gaza after the havoc ends.
So, even though it’s massively, monstrously outweighed by the October 7 massacre, what good could conceivably come of this? Two things.
First, Hamas has discredited and disgraced itself as a savage terrorist organization that cannot be trusted and must be crippled to the extent possible.
This seems painfully clear today. But up until October 7, and despite its many bouts of combat with and rocket attacks against Israel, certain experts and Israeli officials entertained the notion of a “pragmatic Hamas” that had evolved past its genocidal 1988 Covenant, a document that channels the notoriously fake Protocols of the Elders of Zion and other antisemitic attacks. These officials included the former national security adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Will Hamas necessarily vanish from the scene in the wake of Israel’s likely onslaught? We’ll see. Its ideology will live on after many of its leaders and members are killed. What’s more, the New York Times’ Thomas Friedmanand other observers wonder whether Israel will walk into a trap if it launches a full-fledged invasion of Gaza. Hamas and its ally Iran may well welcome such an attack, valuing the propaganda victories that could flow from the potentially massive Palestinian and Israeli deaths to which they’re indifferent.
Regardless, it’s crucial to at least and at last clearly see Hamas for what it is. In the words of one Palestinian human rights activist: “The world knows Hamas now as terrorists who have committed depraved atrocities that would even make ISIS blush. But the people of Gaza already knew them…[as] monsters for years.”
Netanyahu’s Demise
Second, the atrocious intelligence, preparedness and response failures by the Netanyahu government – which, to be clear, I’m in no way equating with the Hamas butchery – could well result in his political demise after this war’s deadly dust has settled. As an Israeli former deputy national security adviser puts it, “The only good news is that the magnitude of the debacle will likely hasten the downfall of the criminally negligent and fundamentally illegitimate government in office in Israel today.”
Over the course of his many years dominating the country’s political landscape, starting long before he launched his current assault on Israeli democracy, Netanyahu has inundated the West Bank with settlements that undercut the relatively moderate Palestinian Authority there and sabotage the possibility of Palestinian statehood. He has explicitly vowed to block such statehood; he tolerated and even propped up Hamas in certain respects in pursuit of that goal.
In the interest of his evading justice and jail, last year Netanyahu brought into his government far-right religious zealots who prioritize West Bank domination over human rights, national security and national unity. They include his national security minister, previously convicted of supporting a terrorist organization, incitement to racism and many other charges.
Given that so much blood was spilled barely a week ago, is it too soon to point a finger at Netanyahu and his ilk? The brother of an Israeli soldier killed battling the Hamas invasion does not think so: “The bunch of imbeciles leading the country we live in, the country where my beloved little brother was killed protecting the homeland that forgot us — not because it was inevitable but because this disgraceful government is involved in everything it should not be involved in. My beloved brother was murdered by hate-filled terrorists, but those who disgracefully opened the door for them are the Israeli government, from the minister of national security and his messianic friends — clowns who busy themselves creating violent, idiotic slogans — to the prime minister, who is doing everything in his power to disintegrate the State of Israel.”
Could a peaceful two-state solution emerge in partnership with the Palestinian Authority, which recognizes Israel but is corrupt and ineffective? Quite possibly, though not inevitably. And for at least the near future, that possibility weakens in the wake of massive Israeli and Palestinian trauma. But until Netanyahu and his messianic allies lose control of the government, we may never know.
No Equivalence. But Both Must Go.
Let me again be clear: Like that slain soldier’s brother, I’m not equating the Hamas mass murder with the Netanyahu government’s conduct and policies, as execrable as they are. Hamas shows how horrifically low humanity can go.
Moreover, I’ll readily admit that in these unbearably dark days, the possible glimmers of light I’m pointing to lie way beyond the horizon, if they’re there at all.
But after the death and destruction are done or at least diminish, we must seek whatever good, whatever solutions, can emerge from the ashes.
We don’t have any alternative.
. . .
In the name of love, I’ll share a couple of post-October 7 U2 concert videos honoring the October 7 victims. If you’re able to access the first, you may need to go to your downloads to actually view the clip, along with the tear-inducing message and photos associated with it. The second lacks that additional information. But it is easier to access, and the band’s moving words and music are still worth viewing.
This post was produced by Benicia resident Stephen Golub. Steve blogs about domestic and international politics and policy, including lessons that the United States can learn from other nations, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country. If interested, you may sign up for future posts by subscribing to the blog.
Read more from Steve by visiting his blog or clicking any of the links below.
[Note from BenIndy: According to the Wall Street Journal, there ‘hasn’t been a major new oil refinery built in the U.S. since the 1970s, and many plants are more than 100 years old’ – including the BP refinery in Oregon, Ohio that killed two brothers last year, as detailed in this amazing WSJ article. (Our own Benicia Refinery was completed in 1969, for Humble Oil, which changed its name to Exxon in 1972. Valero purchased the property in 2000.) Meanwhile, according to the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, ‘2021 was the worst year for serious incidents at U.S. refineries since 2015, measured by hours worked, with the rate of so-called process-safety events 25% higher than in 2019 and 2020’ (cited in this article). These shocking numbers underscore a truly heartbreaking story shared below, a story all refinery town residents should sit with as we take a hard look at the deteriorating facilities yet looming in our own backyards, degrading in real time as they prop up a dying industry supposedly slated for phase-out.]
America’s aging oil refineries faced pressure to ramp back up quickly after the pandemic. BP’s Ohio site spiraled into tragedy.a
Wall Street Journal, by Jenny Strasburg | Photographs by Brittany Greeson for WSJ
OREGON, Ohio—Ben Morrissey wasn’t supposed to be at the refinery the night it blew up.
A new-hire trainee, Ben stuck around after his shift ended to help his big brother, Max, try to regain control over a facility that was belching smoke and flashing an unusually bright, towering flare that could be seen all over town.
The overtime was just part of the lure for Ben, a 32-year-old with a second baby on the way, an old house to remodel and a decade of hard-fought sobriety under his belt.
Ben also had reasons for wanting to stay close to his older brother.
Max, 34, had recently told friends and family that he was nervous about going to work. Over the summer, he took a brief leave, citing the stress of the job and concerns about safety.
Coming out of the pandemic in 2022, London energy giant BP had ordered a costly and complicated maintenance tuneup, a monthslong project called a turnaround. An army of employees and contractors put much of the facility, located in the Toledo suburb of Oregon, through a complete shutdown and systematic restart.
It is accepted wisdom in the industry that, just as airplane takeoffs and landings are the most dangerous times of flight, refinery risks can run highest during a turnaround.
By the end of July, BP was ready to ramp back up, but complications continued to emerge, as workers struggled to regulate pressures and curb a troublesome buildup of liquids.
On Sept. 20 of last year, Max had been back from leave for about a month when his supervisors asked him to come in before his shift to help resolve the latest problems. He declined, opting instead to keep working in the pizza and ice cream shop he had recently opened, and which he believed would be his ticket out of the refinery.
Max’s father, Bob Morrissey, was helping in the shop that day. “I told you guys, you guys are f—ed up over there, and I’m not coming in until I have to,” he heard Max say over the phone.
By the time Max arrived at the refinery for his 5 p.m. shift, workers had spent the prior 12 hours wrestling a cascade of malfunctions into submission, in part by shutting down several key units.
The lull was deceiving. All of the problems and temporary fixes had changed the underlying recipe of the oil flowing into the refinery’s production machinery, according to preliminary government findings and BP’s own internal assessment of what happened that day.
Among the changes: After being diverted earlier, liquid was accumulating in a drum where it wasn’t supposed to be.
About an hour into Max’s scheduled evening shift, the Morrissey brothers were among a small team dispatched over crackling radios to tackle the liquid buildup—apparently unaware that it was naphtha, a highly flammable substance distilled from crude. They were working outside surrounded by towering equipment. Some of the naphtha could be routed to the flare, where it could burn off, and some of it could be sent to the refinery’s self-contained sewer system.
But the drum kept filling too quickly. Alarms blared in the control room.
The brothers—wearing breathing apparatuses and protective gloves—began draining naphtha to the ground. A vapor cloud formed around them.
Refinery veterans say a vapor cloud, like a shimmery mirage over a highway on a hot day, is difficult to see when you’re close to it. But other nearby workers could see the telltale distortions at the edges of the cloud, with Ben and Max standing inside it.
When the wind shifted on the path of an approaching storm, it pushed the cloud toward a giant nearby furnace.
At 6:46 p.m., a boom reverberated for miles and blasted a wall of flame and smoke through the heart of the refinery.
One worker nearby, Thomas Newman, saw Max stumble out of the flames, engulfed from head to toe.
Max screamed at Newman to find Ben.
Newman blasted Max with water and struggled to drag him away from the fire, trying not to pull off chunks of his severely burned skin. Max screamed to let him try to walk.
Then Max asked Newman to call his wife, Darah.
“Darah, this is Tom, I work with Max,” Newman told her. “He’s hurt really bad.”
Darah sensed the panic in Newman’s voice. She asked if Max was going to the hospital.
“And he just said, ‘I don’t know. I don’t know. Oh, my God, I just gotta get him out of here.’”
This account of what happened that day and in the months leading up to it is based on conversations with dozens of people who have worked at the refinery or are familiar with its operations, as well as hundreds of pages of documents including BP’s own nonpublic reports on the accident, internal BP emails and records tied to refinery staffing, finances and maintenance. It is also based on photographs, audio and video recordings related to the refinery and public reports from government investigations.
Three federal agencies have issued final or preliminary findings about the explosion, with two regulators citing the refinery operator for a range of training and operational deficiencies. One of the agencies, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, identified 10 violations it called serious, including the failure to train workers about the presence of naphtha and to control how refinery equipment is drained. Two other investigations are continuing.
BP has spent years working to come out of the shadow of two of the most devastating industrial accidents in U.S. history, including a 2010 explosion that destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico, killing 11 workers and causing billions of dollars in environmental damage. In 2005, a deadly explosion at its Texas City, Texas, refinery killed 15 workers and injured more than 170 others.
The company is contesting OSHA’s findings about the Toledo explosion. In a statement, a BP spokesman said the company is cooperating with accident investigations, adding, “Wherever we work, safety is BP’s priority. We are determined to learn from last year’s terrible accident at the Toledo refinery that resulted in the deaths of Ben and Max Morrissey.”
America’s Aging Refineries
There hasn’t been a major new oil refinery built in the U.S. since the 1970s, and many plants are more than 100 years old, including the one in Toledo. U.S. petroleum-refining capacity peaked in early 2020, according to federal data, and by the start of this year there were 124 refineries in operation nationwide, 51 fewer than three decades ago.
The costly work of maintaining refineries dropped off sharply in 2020 as Covid-19 stifled fuel demand. Refineries postponed planned maintenance and improvement projects—first during Covid and then amid supply-chain disruptions and pressure to ramp back up to take advantage of high profits from resurgent demand. Shareholders in big oil companies and refinery operators were hungry for cash following huge losses in 2020.
“A lot of refiners, if they could, pushed projects into 2022 so they could take advantage of high margins,” said Hillary Stevenson, an analyst with energy-research and data firm IIR Energy, who wasn’t referring specifically to BP. With their shrunken capacity, she said, “refiners had to do more with less.”
As the pandemic wore on, safety suffered. Industry statistics compiled by American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, an industry lobbying group, show that 2021 was the worst year for serious incidents at U.S. refineries since 2015, measured by hours worked, with the rate of so-called process-safety events 25% higher than in 2019 and 2020.
The incidents, including releases of chemicals, crude, vapors and other substances serious enough to cause injuries, evacuations or other consequences, ticked down last year but remained above the 2019 level. The AFPM notes that over recent decades, industry safety has improved significantly.
For BP, its sprawling U.S. refining business long conflicted with an effort to recast itself as a green company that was “Beyond Petroleum.” From 2010 to last year, the company sold off refineries, cutting the number globally to seven from 16, with the U.S. refinery count reduced to three from five, including fully and partially owned sites. After Bernard Looney took over as CEO in February 2020, he redoubled efforts to cut harmful greenhouse-gas emissions and oil production, in a strategy he dubbed “Reinvent BP.”
Its workers didn’t know it yet, but the Ohio refinery would soon find itself on the BP discard pile.
‘We have a lot of things that can go ‘boom’ in this town’
Since 1919, the former Standard Oil plant in the Toledo suburb of Oregon has been churning out some mix of gasoline, diesel, asphalt, propane and jet fuel through its snaking labyrinth of tanks, valves, towers, furnaces and piping sprawled across the south shore of Lake Erie.
With its long main drag of aging strip malls, chain family-style restaurants and local watering holes, Oregon has about 20,000 residents and a suburban-rural-industrial vibe, with webs of railroad tracks passing neighborhoods with brick and clapboard houses and farms with duck ponds.
Refinery workers in this union stronghold can routinely pull in $140,000 a year including overtime and bonuses, plus good benefits, without a college degree.
Oregon’s two big refineries protrude from the pancake-flat landscape 4 miles apart on opposite sides of town, just across the Maumee River from Toledo. The landmark Veterans’ Glass City Skyway bridge connects Oregon to Toledo.
Four workers died in 2004 when a massive crane being used to construct the bridge collapsed. One of them, a 42-year-old ironworker, was Ben and Max’s uncle.
The risks associated with the heavy industry that powers the local economy are embedded in daily life.
“We have a lot of things that can go boom in this town,” said former Oregon fire chief Denny Hartman, who retired in 2022.
BP, operating as British Petroleum, bought into the Toledo refinery in the 1980s. Through restructurings it came to be known as the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery.
After Looney took over as CEO, executives said BP would streamline refinery maintenance including turnarounds, and put that business under one roof in the corporate structure with its global oil-and-gas production.
Looney’s Reinvent strategy also eliminated thousands of jobs globally. At the Toledo refinery, the cost-cutting meant more than one out of every 10 salaried employees left, many through a wave of buyouts, leading managers to backfill jobs with less-experienced workers, according to internal documents and people close to the decisions.
Looney, who resigned from BP in September over what the company described as failures to disclose details of past relationships with colleagues, referred requests for comment to BP.
A turnaround is a crucial maintenance project to enable repairs and upgrades. It is like tearing apart and rebuilding a life-size industrial Erector Set, with the complexity of shutting down and restarting furnaces, boilers and flares with toxic liquids and vapors that can be deadly even when operations are in a steady state.
The plan in late 2021 was for BP and its refinery co-owner, Calgary-based Cenovus Energy, to invest more than $400 million in the plant during the 2022 turnaround, according to internal communications.
But the turnaround was messy, with cost overruns, a spate of fires that delayed work and operating problems that continued even after the formal end of the project, internal refinery documents show.
During the first half of 2022, the plant’s roughly 600-strong workforce ballooned with the addition of around 5,000 third-party contractors on site each day at the project’s peak, according to internal refinery communications.
The thousands of contract workers, many from petrochemical and refining hubs in Texas, filled Oregon’s hotel rooms and bedrooms that locals rented out across town. For much of spring and summer, locals say, hangouts like Luckies Barn & Grill were teeming every night with out-of-town workers.
On March 23, 2022, Des Gillen, then the Toledo refinery’s general manager, sent an email memo to all Toledo staff. It marked the 17-year anniversary of BP’s Texas City refinery disaster.
“This tragedy affected BP to the core, and changed the way we view safety forever,” Gillen wrote. He urged managers to pull their teams together and talk about Texas City and how to apply its lessons to the coming turnaround, including responding to safety alarms and closely following written procedures.
“Where that can’t be done safely then we should stop, assess the risk and document any changes,” Gillen wrote.
Yet problems persisted. Over one 10-day period in July, the refinery suffered more than 20 instances known as “loss of primary containment,” spills and accidental releases of both toxic and nontoxic materials. Several were serious, causing management to call for extra vigilance around valves and pressure readings, documents show.
Some workers in charge of operating refinery equipment complained supervisors were rushing safety checks and asking employees to sign off on procedures that hadn’t been completed to show progress with the turnaround, according to private communications and people involved in some of the discussions.
The undertaking meant that as soaring margins fueled huge profits at U.S. refineries, BP-Husky was almost entirely offline for three months. The documents show the refinery lost $404.2 million during the first seven months of 2022, more than BP had forecast, by a measure BP calls replacement cost profit that is similar to net income.
Immediately after the turnaround, in early August, BP disclosed that it would sell its half-ownership of the refinery to Cenovus for $300 million and relinquish its operating role. The Canadian company said in its Aug. 8 announcement that the just-finished turnaround would “improve operational reliability” at the refinery.
Before BP had a chance to turn over the keys, the refinery would claim two lives.
The Morrissey Brothers
Maxwell Morrissey was a prankster, famous among his classmates for doing a backflip off the stage at his high-school graduation.
A marathon runner and triathlete, he tried for two and a half years to qualify as a Navy SEAL but left the service in frustration after repeated injuries.
He got work on the assembly line of the massive Jeep plant in Toledo, following in the footsteps of his father, a former senior automotive-union leader, before moving into better-paying refinery work. He started at the BP plant in April 2020, the early depths of the pandemic.
The more reserved of the two, Benjamin Morrissey took a more tortured path.
A drug addiction that his parents said had started in high school with weight-loss pills to manage his bulk for wrestling escalated to include narcotics for minor injuries. That soon devolved into a heroin habit.
Ben’s parents tried to push him into rehab, but it didn’t take. They said he overdosed twice and had to be rushed to the hospital.
“We thought we were going to lose him,” said his father.
Ben decided he couldn’t clean up close to home, and in late 2011, he looked farther afield. He soon enrolled in an inpatient center run by Franciscans an hour’s drive north of New York City. He spent several months at a shelter that provided 24-hour support, transitioned to outpatient care and came out clean for good.
“Are you guys ready to have 110% fun?” newly sober Ben would ask friends before they headed out on beaten-up dirt bikes or fired up the grill for a beer-free barbecue, remembers Mark Choinski, a financial planner who went through recovery with Ben and stayed close with him. “He always wanted to be at the party, without having to party.”
Living in New York’s Hudson Valley, Ben hired on as an ironworker, got certified to weld on bridges and showed a knack for fixing up motorcycles and boat engines. He met his future wife, Kaddie, at Max’s 2016 wedding in Mexico.
She remembers asking why he wasn’t drinking, and he said he was sober. She found him cute and awkward, “but it was like a good awkward.” They danced and talked all night, then dated long-distance before marrying three years later.
Ben eventually moved back to Oregon, where his sisters Carolyn and Erin were living with their families near Max and their parents. They were all still grieving the 2014 suicide of their sister Katie at age 29.
Having Ben back home, sober and in love, with a toddler son, pulled the family together in new ways.
Ben found nearby support meetings and was soon leading some of them. Now he was organizing get-togethers and cooking meals for the whole family.
“It was joyful,” said sister Carolyn. “I had my guard up just because I was worried about him falling into old habits.…But he was holding his own.”
Max, who by now had two small boys with his wife Darah, vouched for Ben with his bosses at the refinery.
The boys were close. They grew up wrestling together in high school and shared dreams of building lake houses and hosting family cookouts and fishing trips as their own children grew. In his obituary, Max’s family said his nieces and nephews called him “the Fun-cle.”
About six months into their marriage, “Max came to my work and said, ‘I need to borrow your car. I need to drive to Detroit real quick,’” Darah recalled.
“And he came home with a pizza oven.”
A couple of days later, he added a food-service truck that he planned to park in downtown Toledo to serve people coming out of minor-league baseball games and bars at night. That morphed into Red Eye Pie and Frozen Fantasty’s, a carryout pizza and ice cream restaurant.
With a sliding window at the walk-up counter, picnic tables and kids’ bikes parked out front, the restaurant had its grand opening in May—four months before the accident.
Max usually didn’t talk much about the details of his refinery job, Darah said, but last year, he told her, one of his sisters and a close friend that he was nervous about going to work. He battled with supervisors and took off about a month of “stress leave” during the summer.
“His safety concerns were genuine,” said friend and colleague Dustin Jones, 42, who worked closely with Max and was with him minutes before he died.
In late 2021, Max and his colleague Thomas Newman shot cellphone video of a relatively new piece of equipment, the piping of a heat exchanger connected to a gas plant. In the video, liquid is spewing from seams in the piping and pooling on the ground. It was naphtha.
Max sent one of the videos to colleagues, in which he complained that people at the refinery wouldn’t take his safety alerts seriously. He told co-workers that the refinery across town, where he worked for several years before joining BP, wouldn’t have let such malfunctions and leaks go unfixed.
It couldn’t be learned whether BP addressed any of Max’s complaints.
Max’s complaints made him unpopular to some of his bosses, and frustrated co-workers who thought he could have been more measured when he spoke up about what he saw as problems at the plant.
“I think everybody liked Max, but Max couldn’t go with the flow. He liked to stir the pot,” Jones said. “But he was right.”
At home, Max appeared increasingly anxious.
“He told me I didn’t understand how dangerous his job was,” Darah said. “He told me that BP was going to kill him.”
She told him that if he wanted to, he should quit and they would figure out the money and health insurance, which she lacked working as a hairdresser. But she also said she thought he was being dramatic in his impatience to be his own boss.
“You’re fine,” she said. “You’re not going to die there.”
‘Our lives are just forever changed’
The refinery started to show signs of trouble late on the night of Sept. 19 and got worse in the early-morning hours before workers arrived for the 5 a.m. daytime shift.
In and around a unit known as Crude 1, the towering heart of the refinery’s production machinery, valve pressures and liquid levels climbed to dangerous levels.
One of those valves was labeled “Process Safety Valve 1457,” in keeping with refinery practices of tagging equipment for maintenance and record-keeping. PSV-1457 was a heavy cylinder about two feet tall. Its purpose was to relieve pressure above set operating limits to prevent harm to equipment and people when things went wrong.
The valve had been worked on during the turnaround, including testing and quality-control checks, according to detailed turnaround records, some of which list names of a BP supervisor and an outside contractor alongside tasks to be performed.
But on this morning, PSV-1457 couldn’t handle the pressure. BP and outside investigators would later say it was wrongly configured for the job—wrong design, wrong pressure rating, according to BP’s internal assessment—making it a root cause of the refinery’s accelerating instability. Increased naphtha flows pushed PSV-1457 past its limits, leading it to chatter, or rapidly open and close, which caused a deafening racket as nearby equipment shook violently.
An operator called for a shutdown of the unit. A supervisor said no, according to accounts of workers who were there.
The severe vibrations continued. At around 8 a.m., workers found naphtha spewing to the ground from a failed weld—eventually enough to fill a small backyard swimming pool. Over the next two hours, they fought to beat down the resulting naphtha vapor cloud with water from high-capacity jets while they raced to isolate the valves and stop the bleeding. Several suffered chemical burns on their legs and feet.
The vapor cloud could have been catastrophic, but the water blasts managed to dissipate it.
Through the morning and afternoon, Oregon residents circulated photos on social media and text chats of the apparent troubles at the refinery, evidenced by the larger-than-normal flare atop the main tower.
Hartman, the fire chief, also noticed it, and drove over to the main refinery entrance to see what needed to be done.
“When you see a change in that flare stack, you know something is wrong. They were burning big and bright,” he said.
Hartman ran into his assistant chief there, who had also noticed the flare. They phoned the BP fire chief inside and asked what was going on.
“We have an unusual event, it’s under control, we’re not going to need you,” Hartman said he was told. They left.
The naphtha hydrotreater and another nearby unit were shut down. The gas plant that Max had complained about—with the video showing the naphtha spray—was bypassed.
Crude 1 kept running, but at a rate of around 84,000 barrels a day, less than its normal 100,000 or more. Crude 1 is where Max and Ben would soon be working side by side, after Ben overstayed his shift and Max arrived.
They hugged as they greeted each other outside amid the roaring machinery.
But soon there was chaos inside the refinery control room—a cacophony of alarms with lights flashing red, yellow and magenta.
Different supervisors gave overlapping and conflicting instructions about how to handle the plant’s spiraling issues, partly because they themselves had incomplete knowledge of everything going wrong, according to workers and documents tied to some of the investigations. Both inside the control room and outside with the roaring machinery, some employees making split-second decisions that changed the course of the day’s events had barely any experience in the jobs they were filling that night.
Several units of the facility had already been turned off, and some people inside the control room pushed to shut down the central crude unit.
One control-room operator, Doug Andrews, had come on duty at 4:15 p.m. Andrews had spent years operating the equipment outside, but he had just come out of training in the control room. It was buzzing with more people than normal, confusing the reporting lines.
Andrews, growing increasingly worried about the level of the liquid in the fuel-gas mix drum, made three requests to more-senior employees to shut down the heat sources feeding the main crude tower, according to notes from an interview that was conducted as part of BP’s accident investigation and accounts of workers who were there.
“Don’t quit,” one of the more-senior control room operators told Andrews. “You’ve got this,” another said, standing behind him and his flashing computer screens. Still another colleague didn’t say anything at that moment, but later said he was worried they were going to lose the refinery.
“I don’t have control,” Andrews said as smoke poured out of the refinery stacks. He was losing pressure readings. He moved to shut down key furnaces without anyone giving him permission, he later told BP lawyers. But it was too late.
Max and Ben were among the four workers who responded to requests from control-room operators to drain the mix drum, according to federal investigators with the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. At that time, personnel were unaware the liquid was naphtha, according to BP’s internal report.
Co-workers said the protective equipment Ben and Max were wearing would have made it difficult, if not impossible, for them to smell or feel the liquid to help them know what they were draining. It might have been more-benign wastewater, for all they knew. And exactly what orders were given, or how clear they were—there were also problems with radio transmissions, and confusion over who was in charge, several workers say—remains in dispute.
After a while, two of the workers dashed off to troubleshoot other problems, leaving Ben and Max. BP, in its internal report about the evening of Sept. 20, refers to the brothers as unnamed “outside operators” and says they drained the liquid directly to the ground, against refinery rules.
OSHA in its findings said BP failed to evaluate how the mix drum might over fill and how to drain it, which it said “exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards from potential releases of flammable liquids or gasses.”
From a house about a mile away from the refinery, Randy Tharpe II, an Applebee’s manager who used to work at the BP plant, heard the blast and called 911.
“I just heard ‘boom.’ I see smoke. And I see gas plumes in the sky,” Tharpe told a 911 operator, according to a recording of the call.
His voice took on more urgency.
“I don’t want to blow up.”
At home 2 miles away, Max’s wife Darah was making dinner for their boys, Wilde and Recker, ages 4 and 2 at the time, and looking online at flights for a trip she and Max were planning to Walt Disney World at Christmas. She didn’t want to go to the theme park again—it wasn’t exactly relaxing—but Max had insisted it should be an annual tradition.
Her cellphone rang. She didn’t recognize the number and let it go to voicemail. It rang again immediately.
It was a man, and in the background, someone unrecognizable to her, screaming.
Newman told her about the blast and that Max was hurt. Shortly after hanging up, he snapped photos of Max with his cellphone, at Max’s request. Max’s own phone was charred.
In one of the images, Max is sitting on a plastic bucket, looking down where most of his clothes are missing except for part of his shirt and his boots. In another, his eyes, wide-open and wild, look straight into the camera. He looks shocked but also capable of standing up and walking away.
Ben was likewise lucid, giving hope to co-workers who continued fighting the fire after the brothers were rushed to the hospital—first in Toledo, and then to Ann Arbor, Mich., by ambulance.
Darah got to Ann Arbor about the same time as the ambulance, and the rest of the family gathered together as the prognosis for the brothers grew increasingly dire.
That night, Kaddie told family members that she and Ben were expecting another child—a daughter, Benna, who would be born the following year.
Bob and Patty Morrissey say the family is broken in ways that may never be fixed.
“Everybody’s in therapy. People are on antidepressants,” Patty Morrissey said. “Our lives are just forever changed.”
In the driveway of their Oregon home, there was a fishing boat with a new motor, welded in place one night by Ben as a surprise for his dad. Out back by the pond was the barbecue where the brothers would hold family cookouts. In the dining room, Bob Morrissey showed a wall of high-school graduation portraits of their five children.
“Yeah,” he said, “the two on the left are the only ones left.
—Family videos and photographs of Max and Ben Morrissey provided by the Morrissey family. The refinery video at the top of the story is by Ryan Rohm via Storyful —Design by Kara Dapena
You must be logged in to post a comment.