Category Archives: Stephen Golub

Stephen Golub: Slavery, Philly and 1984 in 2026

Park Service and Justice Department – Erasing select portions of our American history

The Benicia Herald, [Updated May 19, 2026],  by Stephen Golub 

Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub

Illuminating History

The Trump administration is engaged in a multipronged attempt to rewrite history. During a recent trip to Philadelphia, I visited one example of that effort’s egregious excesses.

Inaugurated in 2010, the central Philly “President’s House” is an open-air exhibition that documents George and Martha Washington’s roles as slaveholders. It’s situated where  our first First Couple lived, from 1790 to 1797. Though the abode itself is long gone, the site is anchored by an excavation of their home’s slave quarters.

In other words, America’s first “White House” housed slaves.

The exhibition’s informational panels, displays and videos movingly portray the context and cruelty of the Washingtons’ actions, including the lives of the nine persons considered their “property.”  A loophole-ridden Pennsylvania law ostensibly allowed slaves belonging to other states’ residents (such as the Washingtons, who were Virginians) to free themselves after six months in Pennsylvania. But this was easily evaded by “rotating” the enslaved out of the state, however briefly.

The site is not entirely negative. It describes Ben Franklin’s advocacy for abolition. In a bit more depth, it also tells the story of Oney Judge, Martha’s personal slave. As described elsewhere, she  escaped during a two-day “rotation” to Trenton, New Jersey. Judge made her way to live freely (and eventually pass away) in New Hampshire. George repeatedly but unsuccessfully sought to compel her return, including via a foiled kidnapping attempt in 1798.

All in all, then, the modest several-hundred-foot exhibition has educated visitors about an element of Washington’s identity and our history that typically is not taught in schools. Situated right next door to the Liberty Bell Center and surrounded by numerous other historical monuments, the President’s House serves as an illuminating counterpoint to those other  sites’ legitimately positive themes. As I heard one father explain to his ten(?)-year-old son, “Our country has done some bad things.”

More Bad Things…

Out of the blue, however, on January 22 the U.S. Park Service dismantled the site. Quickly challenged by a City of Philadelphia lawsuit, the Department of Justice contended that the exhibition “inappropriately disparage[d] Americans” as part of an effort to promote “corrosive ideology.”

In deciding the case, Federal Judge Cynthia M. Rufe strenuously disagreed. The George W. Bush appointee prefaced her decision to restore the exhibition by quoting George Orwell’s dystopian novel, 1984:

“All history was…scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary. In no case would it have been possible, once the deed was done, to prove that any falsification had taken place.”

As she further explained in her ruling, “It is not disputed that President Washington owned slaves…And yet, in its argument, the government claims it alone has the power to erase, alter, remove and hide historical accounts on taxpayer and local government-funded monuments within its control.”

Likening the Trump administration’s  argument to 1984, she continued, “The government here likewise asserts truth is no longer self-evident, but rather the property of the elected chief magistrate and his appointees and delegees, at his whim to be scraped clean, hidden, or overwritten… And why? Solely because, as Defendants [the government] state, it has the power.”

Judge Rufe accordingly ordered the reinstatement of the exhibition. But an April appeals court interim ruling froze that reinstatement about half-way through the process.

That’s where the matter stands, pending full consideration by that court. Supplemented by hand-made signs, the displays again enable some basic education about slavery and Washington’s roles in it. Those roles included signing the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793, which permitted slaveholders or their agents to cross state lines to capture escaped slaves, and his own attempts to use the law to seize Ona Judge.

Erasing History

The Trump administration’s planned, whitewashed (so to speak) replacement for the anti-slavery exhibition erases such facts or buries them in supposed context. It lavishes Washington with praise, while relegating his conduct to a few lines explaining  that he considered freeing his slaves, let them “explore the city” and otherwise treated them better than some other slaveholders. It also notes that Washington’s will provided for freeing his own slaves (though Martha’s remained in bondage); with the exception of one man’s wife and children, however, the text  is very vague about who was freed.

I’m by no means saying that we should deny Washington’s great contributions to our country by removing his name from schools and institutions or otherwise dishonoring him. He was a product of his time – though let’s bear in mind that, like Ben Franklin, many in his time in America and abroad opposed slavery. Regardless, in a sense we dishonor him by denying the truth about him; we certainly dishonor those enslaved by him and so many other people pummeled for their entire lives by slavery’s savagery.

The administration’s official efforts to cancel history involve far more than attempts to cover up aspects of such bondage. They certainly embrace recent history: We’re witnessing endless attempts by Trump and his sycophants to deny the 2020 presidential election results, with many such attempts geared toward manipulating the 2026 and 2028 contests. He’s pardoned the January 6 insurrectionists, painted them as heroes and even established a $1.776 billion federal fund that could feature compensation for them and other Trump allies who were supposedly “unjustly” targeted for prosecution by the Biden administration.

We’ve also seen Trump almost literally echo 1984’s “War is Peace” declaration with his claims that the Iran ceasefire is in effect even as missiles fly and people die

Nor am I asserting that America in 2026 is anywhere near Orwell’s 1984. But we do have  a president for whom the novel’s totalitarian catchphrases provide more of a model than an admonition:

War is Peace.

Ignorance is Strength.

Freedom is Slavery.


[Hat tip to Pat Loeb, a superb journalist (and old friend) who is currently City Hall Bureau Chief for KYW Newsradio in Philadelphia and who acquainted me with the President’s House exhibition and this evolving story.]


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

Stephen Golub writes about democracy and politics, both in America and abroad, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country.

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

Back to top

Stephen Golub: Starting Over

Starting Over in Beautiful Benicia…

The Benicia Herald, May 10, 2026,  by Stephen Golub 

My Wife and I Starting Over in Benicia…

Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub

I keep a playlist of positive songs that lift me up when my state of mind or the state of the world has me down. The artists range from Jimmy Cliff to the Beatles to Pink to LeAnn Rimes to will.i.am to Sting. Many playlist items are Springsteen songs (“Land of Hope and Dreams,” “Waitin’ on a Sunny Day,” “The Rising”) or Tim McGraw tunes (“Hold On to It,” “Humble and Kind,” “Live Like You Were Dying”).

Lately, partly with Benicia in mind, I’ve played country star Chris Stapleton’s “Starting Over” a lot. More on that that song a minute.

When my wife and I moved to Benicia in 2019, our impetus to start over was the potential fires threatening our Oakland hills home. Decimated by the hills’ deadly 1991 firestorm, the area had rebuilt and regenerated since our moving  there in 2001. We were reluctant to leave our sweet life in Oakland, but the danger and disruptions remained: our almost evacuating twice in the middle of the night; frequent PG&E power cuts; many neighbors’ insurance policies canceled; highly flammable eucalyptus and pine groves; narrow streets making evacuation problematic; our worrying about what each fire season might bring.

So, after almost twenty terrific years there, on a lark we began looking for a new home in beautiful Benicia. We never looked back.

Did we get it right in assessing the Oakland fire threat so seriously? For the sake of everyone still in those hills – and in view of rising real estate values and fire mitigation efforts there – I actually hope we were wrong. But even if the move to Benicia was in that sense a mistake, it was the best mistake we ever made.

Our Fellow Benicians Starting Over…

Other folks have moved here in recent years for a range of reasons: job changes; launching a new business; post-Covid opportunities to work from home: living near family members; changed financial circumstances. Some native Benicians have moved back after years away. Many newcomers have come from other spots in the Bay Area. I’ve also met residents originally from New York, Kentucky, Canada and other distant locales.

We all know examples of great additions to the community; on our little block alone, we have three newish, youngish households, including a couple of kids. Two other folks who come to mind are Kenneth and Kevin, who a few years ago started Baxters on First Street. My wife and I ate there recently. We loved every aspect of the experience: a small but roomy dining room, appealing  ambiance, a great Old Fashioned drink, delicious Brussels sprouts, a smashing smash burger, succulent scallops and one of the best and cheesiest French onion soups I’ve ever had.*

In addition to replacing a troubled previous establishment with a charming one, what the two have done is add new dimensions to Benicia’s business and community scenes. They’re but one valuable example of new arrivals contributing to  our ever-evolving town.

Even if you were born and bred in Benicia, you’ve quite possibly also started over here in some ways. To start with, congratulations to the young families welcoming new arrivals. In a more somber vein, loved ones moving out or passing on can be a seismic shift. Or, if you’ve taken in a rescue dog, a stray cat or any new pet – and bless you for doing so! – that  new family member adds new dimensions to your life.

Benicia Starting Over…

Much more broadly, even as life goes on in Benicia, in a sense our town is starting over in the wake of the Valero refinery closing. I won’t relitigate that contentious issue here today; I’ll instead focus on moving forward.

That involves considering the hard work that the city’s elected and appointed officials are doing to close our  budget gap, including accessing the tens of millions of dollars of Bay Area Air District funds flowing from Valero fines. It also features various proposals to build a stable, brighter, cleaner future. You can access those ideas in several ways, including by signing up at the city’s website for City Manager Mario Giuliani’s weekly newsletter, reading it here in the Herald and attending or zooming in on City Council meetings.

Also, as lifelong Benician Giuliani has often said, let’s “Believe in Benicia.”

Which brings me back to Chris Stapleton. “Starting Over” is about a couple moving to a new life (as the lyrics go, “out on the coast”…maybe even Benicia?) But it applies to lots of us in our own ways and to Benicia as a whole…

This might not be an easy time
There’s rivers to cross and hills to climb
Some days we might fall apart
And some nights might feel cold and dark

But nobody wins, afraid of losing
And the hard roads are the ones worth choosing
Someday we’ll look back and smile
And know it was worth every mile…

I can be your lucky penny
You can be my four-leaf clover
Starting over

The song’s call to overcome obstacles amply applies to our wonderful town, this place where we’re so lucky to live. Benicia has a lot going for it, not least Benicians believing in ourselves. We’re in good shape to seize the opportunities that come with starting over.

[*Note: Starting later this month,  Baxters’ hours expand to include lunch on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. It will thus be open Wednesday through Sunday from late morning to mid-evening, except for a 3-4 pm break. Please check the restaurant’s website and OpenTable for reservations and precise hours.]


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

Stephen Golub writes about democracy and politics, both in America and abroad, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country.

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

Back to top

Benician Stephen Golub: Pardon Me

Stranger Than Fiction

[sta_anchor id=”top” /]A Promised Land, by Stephen Golub, December 6, 2025

The story could inspire a big-budget Hollywood political thriller. A cocaine kingpin – the corrupt president of a foreign country, no less – is convicted and jailed in the United States. But behind the scenes, right-wing tech billionaires persuade an equally corrupt American president to pardon the foreigner. In a violent side-story, the US president proudly orders illegal, lethal military attacks that kill scores of impoverished Venezuelan fishing villagers (some of whom may be small-scale traffickers) whose coke isn’t even destined for our shores and whose possible crimes pale in comparison with the kingpin’s.

In the hypothetical Hollywood version of this story, the truth comes out, the former president goes back to prison and his American counterpart resigns in shame.

In 2025, however, there is no shame and reality is stranger than fiction. Donald Trump publicly boasted of his planed pardon for former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández before then granting it. Lost in the swirl of Trump’s other transgressions, the story disappeared from the headlines soon after first surfacing.

The element of the hypothetical Hollywood version that hasn’t yet been proven in real life is the tech billionaires’ involvement. But, as reported in Mother Jones magazine,  their backing for both Trump and VP JD Vance on the one hand and their proposed, Hernandez-backed state-within-a-state in Honduras on the other surely looks suspicious.

Even though in normal times such a story would be the stuff of massive scandal, it’s now business as usual when it comes to Trump’s pardons (not to mention so much else). And given that we’re now almost a decade into Trump’s reign of political terror, we must ask what’s normal anymore.

But Wait! There’s Much More…

As horrid as it is, the Hernandez story is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Trump’s abuse of the presidential pardon power. It’s true that certain of his predecessors have also milked that constitutionally granted capacity for personal or political benefit. Bill Clinton’s 2001 pardon of disgraced financier Marc Rich, apparently in return for donations to the Clinton Library and the Democratic Party, is a case in point. But neither Clinton nor anyone else comes close to the breadth and depth of what Trump has done.

Trump established his exploitation of pardons at the very start of his presidency. As summarized by an excellent post by attorney Kim Wehle at The Unpopulist site, “One of his first acts on returning to office was to issue pardons to hundreds of rioters from the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, including those who had viciously assaulted police officers.”  As Wehle further explains:

“It should be no surprise that some of these rioters, having been pardoned for one act of political violence, keep on plotting new acts of political violence. In February, Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio was arrested at the Capitol (again) for assaulting a protester. In July, Edward Kelley, who was “the fourth person to unlawfully enter the Capitol building at the forefront of the mob” and attack an officer, was convicted for a new plot to assassinate “36 individual federal, state, and local law enforcement personnel” whom he blamed for his arrest on the Capitol riot charges. Christopher Moynihan was arrested in October for planning to assassinate House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.”

In an equally valuable post at the same site, author Robert Tracinski summarizes  some of Trump’s many egregious 2025 pardons:

“…from a corrupt sheriff convicted in a “cash for badges” scheme, to disgraced former Congressman George Santos, who may have diverted election funds to support his lavish lifestyle but “was 100% for Trump,” to the healthcare fraud conviction of the husband of Republican Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger, a Trump ally…

“Trump pardoned an executive convicted of tax fraud after the executive’s mother gave $1 million at a Trump fundraiser. The judge who sentenced him said: “there is not a ‘get out of jail free’ card for the rich.” Under Trump, there is…

“In October, he pardoned cryptocurrency fraudster Changpeng Zhao after Zhao’s company, Binance, made a deal to boost World Liberty Financial, the Trump family crypto venture.”

Legitimizing the Rule of Lawlessness

Ironically, however, the most significant pardon we’ve seen recently has not been issued by Trump, but in effect  for Trump, by the Supreme Court. Though not literally a pardon, Wehle addresses the Court’s action quite well:

“Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s unconscionable [2024] decision in Trump v. United States, the so-called immunity ruling that essentially sanctioned American presidents using official power to commit crimes without any penalty, the legal perversions coming out of the White House have been legion. So far, Donald Trump’s actions, along with the Supreme Court’s endorsement of them, have effectively kneecapped the FirstFourth, and Fifth Amendments, the AppointmentsSpending, and Emoluments Clauses, the 14th Amendment’s ban on holding office after having engaged in insurrection, Article I’s vesting of legislative power in Congress, and Congress’s power to lay and collect tariffs. Trump is acting this way because he no longer has any incentive not to.

“In that immunity ruling, a 6-3 majority held that the exercise of “core” powers under Article II of the Constitution is absolutely immune from legal oversight, even if used criminally, and that lesser “official actions” are presumptively immune unless prosecutors can show that criminally confining a presidential act would pose no “dangers on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”

In other words, this was Trump’s own get-out-of-jail-free card, including for corruptly influenced pardons since they’re within the presidency’s “core” powers.

We’re accustomed to thinking that no one is above the law, at least in principle and hopefully in fact. The Supreme Court decided the opposite.

Of course, the immediate and history-shattering  benefit of the Court’s egregious ruling wasn’t for President Trump in 2025 but for Indicted Trump in 2024: the decision so delayed and constrained Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of Trump for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election that Smith dropped the charges after Trump’s 2024 electoral victory.

A Larger Problem

An even larger problem we face, however, isn’t Trump’s legal transgressions but the fact that they apparently don’t dent his political and moral standing for large parts of the public. Yes, his approval numbers are dropping to about 40 percent  or less in most surveys. And yes, the prospects of his suffering more political reversals are rising. This is evinced by everything from far-right-wing Majorie Taylor Greene’s declarations of independence to the Democrats’ increasing prospects for retaking the House of Representatives next year to  the possibility of yet more sordid Jeffery Epstein revelations soiling Trump’s brand even among supporters.

But whatever happened to someone simply paying a penalty for  cheating and lying, not least by blatantly exploiting a presidential power to pardon political and financial allies? Like so many of Trump’s disruptions, this is all going on in plain sight and is in effect pardoned, so to speak, by much of the public.

And while we certainly can understand folks prioritizing the damages he’s doing to our pocketbooks in assessing him, it doesn’t seem like his consistently egregious self-dealing makes much  of a difference in his standing. It’s just another day at the Oval Office.

So, with great respect for everyone who’s fighting for democracy, national security and the rule of law, or who dread the crisis even as they simply try to get by during these tough times, certain words may sum up how history will judge many other Americans who condone or endorse what Trump is doing:

Really regrettable.

Perhaps understandable.

Or, just maybe, unpardonable.


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

[sta_anchor id=”below” /]Stephen Golub writes about democracy and politics, both in America and abroad, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country.

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

Back to top

Stephen Golub: Wed. Nov 25 deadline to comment on $millions for Benicia

Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub

November 25 is the deadline to submit to the Bay Area Air District comments on its Draft Guidelines that will govern use of $60 million in Valero fines for the benefit of Benicia and surrounding communities.  (Valero was penalized because of its refinery’s over 15 years of undisclosed, massive toxic emissions.)

More specifically, now’s the time to back Mayor Steve Young’s proposal to the Air District: $25 million over five years from that $60 million should go for budget support to help Benicia through the imminent loss of Valero revenues (at about $10 million per year, so totaling $50 million over five years), now that it’s closing the refinery.

Or, if you prefer, you may simply argue for a flexible approach, suggest that more than $25 million is necessary or of course otherwise comment in any way you wish on the Draft Guidelines by the November 25 deadline.

You may submit comments to the Air District by emailing the following: communityinvestments@baaqmd.govmhiratzka@baaqmd.gov and vjohnson@baaqmd.gov. Please request that the comments be forwarded to the Air District Board of Directors (and retain your emails because they could come in handy down the line).

If unclear on what you’d put in the subject line, you could write something like:

Comments on the Draft Guidelines for the Local Community Benefits Fund: in favor of a flexible approach.

For additional background and information, including the link to the Draft Guidelines themselves, you may go to the Benicia Independent, at https://beniciaindependent.com/, and scroll down at left to Steve Golub’s detailed November 11 post. Particularly in a subheading titled “Arguments for a flexible approach,” he makes a case for flexibility in this Air District grantmaking.

If you wish, you could cc or bcc Mayor Young , Vice Mayor Scott, City Manager Giuliani (syoung@ci.benicia.ca.us, Terry Scott tscott@ci.benicia.ca.us, Mario Giuliani MGiuliani@ci.benicia.ca.us) and/or other City Council members.[sta_anchor id=”below” /]


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

CHECK OUT STEPHEN GOLUB’S BLOG, A PROMISED LAND

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

 

Back to top