Tag Archives: Stephen Golub

Birdseye and Scott for Benicia City Council

“With Benicia at a crossroads…

By Stephen Golub, Benicia resident and author, “Benicia and Beyond” column in the Benicia Herald, October 11, 2026

Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub

With Benicia at a crossroads, facing both daunting challenges and exciting opportunities, our city needs sound, committed leadership. City Council incumbents and Democrats Kari Birdseye and Terry Scott offer exactly that. Their challenger, Republican-endorsed Justin Zollars, seems like he has a sincere interest in similarly helping Benicia move forward. But for reasons I’ll broach in a bit, he does not merit support.

Just one logistical note, to be clear: We each can vote for two Council candidates this year. So, Scott and Birdseye are not running against each other. In fact, they’ve endorsed each other. I enthusiastically suggest that you vote for both.

Deep Community Roots, Valuable Experience and Commendable Track Records

Both Birdseye and Scott bring to the table deep community roots, as well as  a wealth of valuable experience and track records that demonstrate successful commitments to Benicia’s well-being. Both have been part of a City Council that, often unanimously, has undertaken initiatives to help secure Benicia’s road repairs, parks improvement, a financial future that ensures police and fire protection, and other progress for our quality of life.

These long-standing Benicia residents have done this against a backdrop of challenges imposed by state housing mandates and the loss of Valero-linked revenue. Their experience and dedication also enable them to help seize opportunities presented by the transition of the 900-acre Valero refinery property into residential, commercial and clean industrial parcels and by Benicia’s enviable (and beautiful waterside) position as a transportation, shipping and recreational hub.

Both have led successful fights to keep Benicia’s air, water, kids, seniors and all citizens safe. Both are committed to both business development and affordable housing development for Benicia.

Individual Accomplishments and Contributions

Having said all that, I certainly don’t want to present these two powerful personalities as peas in a pod.

Kari Birdseye

For starters, Kari Birdseye [votekaribirdseye.com] can justifiably boast of an array of accomplishments and contributions to Benicia. These include but are no means limited to: chairing the Planning Commission for over a decade; chairing the City Council’s task force on the future of Benicia’s Industrial Park; successfully fighting Valero’s plan a decade ago to bring dangerous crude oil “bomb trains” through town; and being honored as a 2025 Woman of the Year by Congressman John Garamendi and as a 2025 Blue Rivet Award winner for her environmental and public health leadership. Speaking of her being Woman of the Year: There’s a lot to be said to having a woman on the Council (and hopefully more than one down the line), for the perspective Birdseye brings.

Even if you don’t consider yourself an environmentalist, you might still value Birdseye’s environmental expertise and leadership, a product of not just her Benicia engagement but of her current public affairs position at the Natural Resources Defense Council. That deep-seated knowledge stands her in good stead as our city transitions to cleaner air and cleaner businesses and as we grapple with looming climate change challenges.

Terry Scott

For his part, Terry Scott [terryscott2026.com] brings a diverse wealth of expertise to the Council, ranging from decades of practical, corporate business experience to leadership in Benicia’s thriving arts-and-culture scene (which in turn yields our town concrete economic benefits). His own accomplishments and contributions to Benicia include: serving as a founder and Executive Director of the philanthropic Benicia Community Foundation; chairing the Benicia Arts and Culture Commission and the Public Art Committee; enriching First Street life through introducing the public pianos and similar innovations there; participation in Benicia’s Tax Oversight Commission; and leading (along with Birdseye) the Council task force that established Benicia’s Industrial Safety Commission.

Given Scott’s devotion to the arts, it’s easy to overlook his business background and what it means to the city. As a former senior vice president at Hasbro, he brings hard-headed corporate experience to dealing with the local, national and international dimensions of bringing job-creating and revenue-enhancing investments to Benicia, ranging from the Industrial Park to First Street to the Valero  property transition.

An Abundance of Endorsements

Now, don’t just take my word about these two. Both Birdseye and Scott have garnered an abundance of endorsements, adding up to lists too long to fully detail here. But they include U.S. Congressman John Garamendi, State Senator Christopher Cabaldon, Solano County Supervisor Wanda Williams, Solano County Supervisor Cassandra James, Mayor Steve Young, former City Council Member Tom Campbell, the Solano Association of Realtors, the Solano County Orderly Growth Committee and the Solano County Democratic Central Committee.

Scott’s additional endorsements include City Council member Lionel Largespadea, former  Benicia Mayor Jerry Hayes, former Council Member Christina Strawbridge, former  Benicia City Council Member Pepe Arteaga, the Napa-Solano Labor Council, the North Coast Carpenters Union and Black Women Organized for Political Action. Birdseye’s include the Sierra Club Solano Group.

A Newcomer Candidate

Like Birdseye and Scott, relative newcomer Justin Zollars [votejz.com] brings a dedication to Benicia to his candidacy for City Council. He seems like a bright, nice fellow. And as with Scott and Birdseye (and their fellow current and former fellow Council members), I have to admire anyone who’s willing to stick their neck out to seek and serve in public office – particularly in our nasty social media age.

Nonetheless, there are reasons to doubt how positive or effective Zollars would be as a Council member. For starters, there’s his endorsement by the Solano County Republican Central Committee, something that seems salient but which he does not mention at his campaign website. Together with his repeated, caustic references to a so-called “Detroit Model” at a recent League of Women Voters candidates’ forum, this seems to indicate a political outlook that bears scrutiny – not to mention how different tiny Benicia’s challenges are from those of tremendous Detroit.

At that same LWV forum, Zollars also made a number of comments that indicated inadequate familiarity with Benicia’s opportunities and issues. For instance, he suggested that Benicia’s affordable housing challenges would take care of themselves, as Boomers age out and move out (one way or another), so that we’d somehow supposedly come to resemble Japan with an excess of housing. This does not seem to take account of the scale and complexity of such challenges, even with new developments down the road.

Zollars also admitted to a lack of knowledge of Benicia’s arts scene. Now, that may be true of many Benicians. But given the arts community’s contributions to tourism, our economy and our town’s vibrance, this is the kind of thing a Council candidate should be familiar with.

Even as I disagree with him, I’ll give Zollars begrudging but considerable credit for his zeal regarding his top issue: challenging the Flock Safety firm’s automatic license plate readers, which our police department (along with many other communities) uses to deter crime and detect alleged criminals coming to town. This is a complex matter of public safety versus alleged privacy breaches.

With all due respect for Zollars’ anti-Flock stance, my  own take is this: Until I see proof of significant misuse of the system here in Benicia, I favor Flock for the public safety factor. (I do wonder whether he’s actually led the local fight against Flock, as his campaign website claims.)

Summing Up: Scott and Birdseye for Benicia

All this is a way of saying that while I appreciate Justin Zollars throwing his hat in the ring and I certainly welcome new political blood in Benicia, I don’t believe he knows Benicia well enough yet to serve on the Council. Much more importantly, I question many of the stands he’s taking.

Most importantly of all, I heartily endorse Terry Scott and Kari Birdseye for City Council, for the reasons I’ve sketched here and for many more. I strongly suggest you give them your vote.


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

Stephen Golub writes about democracy and politics, both in America and abroad, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country.

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

Back to top

Vote Yes On Benicia Measures Y And Z

Will Ballot Measures Y and Z Cost You Anything? Questions and Answers on Benicia’s Proposed Transfer Tax

[Editor: in this article Mr. Golub is addressing only Benicia’s Measures Y and Z. For his take on Measure X, see here in his previous article. – RS] By Stephen Golub, Benicia resident and author, “Benicia and Beyond” column in the Benicia Herald, October 4, 2026

Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub

Questions that concerned Benicians might ask about ballot Measures Y and Z…

This November’s Benicia ballot Measure Z would establish a transfer tax for the sale of certain homes. If I buy or sell  a typical, currently existing home, will I have to pay that tax if the measure passes?

No. Almost all currently existing Benicia homes are exempt from the tax, which will be established if Measure Z is approved by Benicians.

This is because the tax only  applies to:

  1. a) new homes that will be built starting in 2027; or
  2. b) currently existing homes sold for $2 million or more, of which there are only a handful here since the average home price in Benicia is about $820,000.

But what if I want to sell a home worth over $2 million to a close relative? Or what if in the future I want to sell a home built after January 1, 2027 to that relative? Do either of us pay that tax?

No. The tax does not apply to sales or gifts of homes between parents and children, grandparents and grandchildren, siblings, spouses and domestic partners. (Certain affordable housing is also exempted.)

Why is the tax necessary?

Despite budget cuts, city government reorganization and other actions, Benicia has an anticipated annual budget gap of at least $7.5 million and perhaps nearly $11 million.

The Measure Z transfer tax will help close that gap in two ways:

  1. a) It will apply not just to residential properties, but also to commercial and industrial sales. In fact, if the transfer tax were already in place in recent years, it could have yielded millions of dollars from sales in the Benicia Industrial Park. More on this below.
  2. b) It will apply to the several thousand new housing units that will be built in Benicia in coming years, as mandated by state law or made possible by redevelopment of the Valero property.

But much potential  new development, whether residential, commercial or industrial, is years away. Will Measure Z produce much revenue in the next few years?

For one thing, potential sales of existing Industrial Park properties could produce large sums of revenue in the next few years. If Measure Z were already in place late last year, Benicia would have pocketed a tax of $1,160,000 from the sale of a large parcel of land in the Industrial Park. Similar future sales are certainly a possibility.

In addition, Measure Z is about the future. It is about putting in place the revenue stream to help Benicia sustain police, fire, recreational, infrastructure and other services for our kids, grandkids and all of us in years to come, so our wonderful town can survive and thrive.

Fair enough, so what will the transfer tax rates be under Measure Z?

The tax is $4, $6 or $8 per $1,000 in sale price, depending on whether the price is under $2,000,000, from $2,000,000 to $9,999,999, or $10,000,000 or more.

Again, though, remember that the tax on residential properties only applies to currently existing homes that sell for $2 million or more, or to homes built after January 1, 2027.

There’s also a ballot Measure Y, right? What does that do?

Measure Y is necessary as a companion law for Measure Z. Measure Y establishes Benicia as a limited Charter City, a status necessary for the city government to set the proposed transfer tax rates under Measure Z. To introduce those rates, then, it is essential to vote Yes on both Measures Y and Z.

I’ve heard certain opponents claim that Measures Y and Z open the door for Benicia to increase the transfer taxes or tax additional properties or expand Benicia’s status as a Charter City in ways we might not like. Is that true?

No. Any of these changes would require new ballot measures that we all would vote on. And there are no plans to propose such changes in any event.

I’ve also heard certain opponents claim that becoming a Charter City or establishing transfer taxes is disastrous for cities. Is this true?

No. There are 25 charter cities in the Bay Area alone, some with transfer taxes higher than those proposed by Measure Z. Charter city status or transfer taxes have not driven away businesses or harmed their financial health. One Bay Area charter city, Vallejo, went bankrupt, but that was for unrelated reasons.

How can I gain more information about this issue?

One good place is Building Benicia’s Future site, at beniciasfuture.org.

So, as summed up at that site, if I own a Benicia home built before 2027 and it sells for under $2 million, I  pay nothing. Do I have that right?

Yes.


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

Stephen Golub writes about democracy and politics, both in America and abroad, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country.

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

Back to top

For Benicia’s kids and grandkids, for our present and future, please vote Yes on Measures X, Y and Z

“Benicia is doing its best…..”

By Stephen Golub, Benicia resident and author, “Benicia and Beyond” column in the Benicia Herald, September 6, 2026

Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub

Benicia is doing its best to close the at least $7.5 million annual resource gap left by the Valero Refinery closing. It’s doing so through budget cuts, operational reorganization and selective revenue generation. In addition, state housing mandates, the conversion of the Refinery property, inflation and emerging challenges (such as rising water levels due to climate change) will stretch police, fire, recreation, infrastructure and other city services.

Which is all a way of saying: Benicia needs additional annual revenues. Ballot Measures X, Y and Z, which we’re voting on this November 3 (or even sooner, if you wish), provide a way of raising such badly needed funds at no cost to most of us.

For a solid, relatively comprehensive explanation of why these measures are necessary, please go to the Building Benicia’s Future site, at beniciasfuture.org. In the meantime, I’ll take a shorter stab at that here.

The point of these items is not only about the present. It’s mainly to pave the way for the future: for  Benicia’s kids, grandkids and families to live in a surviving, thriving city, as fine as or even better than what we have now.

Here’s how these measures will help if passed, starting with the most significant one…

Measure Z: A Reasonable Real Property Transfer Tax

Measure Z proposes a real property transfer tax for residential, commercial and industrial sites. THE MEASURE Z TRANSFER TAX APPLIES TO ALMOST NO EXISTING HOMES AND RESIDENTS. NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, THERE WILL BE NO TRANSFER TAX ON ANY CURRENTLY EXISTING HOME UNDER MEASURE Z IF THE HOME IS SOLD FOR UNDER $2 MILLION. THE TAX  ALSO DOES NOT APPLY TO SALES OR OTHER TRANSFERS WITHIN FAMILIES, including between parents and children, grandparents and grandchildren, siblings, spouses and domestic partners. Certain affordable housing is also exempted.

So, what does Measure Z apply to? Well, for instance, if Measure Z were already in place late last year, Benicia would have pocketed a tax of $1,160,000 when commercial developers Blue Rise Ventures and DRA Advisors paid $145 million for a dozen buildings covering about 15 percent of Benicia’s industrial park. With the possibility that these or other investors could buy other parts of that area, such sales could benefit the city’s coffers considerably in the future if Measure Z is approved.

What’s more, in coming years much or all of the 900-acre Valero refinery site will be sold for industrial, commercial and housing development purposes, at a conceivable cumulative (though admittedly speculative) cost of $1 billion or more. That would mean many millions of dollars for the city. It’s noteworthy that Signature Development Group, the firm commissioned by Valero to sell the property, does not object to Measure Z (or associated Measure Y – more on that below).

Putting aside these huge projects, where does a typical Benician simply selling a private home figure in all this? Almost all of us are off the hook for any transfer tax. As I’ve emphasized, unless you sell a currently existing home for $2 million or more, you never pay the tax on that existing home.

In addition to commercial and industrial properties, the  tax mainly applies to new houses built in 2027 or later.  That is, if you or a developer sells a house that is built  in 2027 or later, the tax is $4, $6 or $8 per $1,000, depending on whether the price is under $2,000,000, from $2,000,000 to $9,999,999, or $10,000,000 or more.

Thus, with  several thousand houses due to be built in Benicia in coming years, the transfer taxes from residential sales would nicely complement the transfer taxes on commercial and industrial transfers.

Measure Y: A Necessary, Limited Charter City Status

Measure Y is the necessary companion to Measure Z. It allows Benicia to become a “limited Charter City,” which means a change in its legal status only for the purpose of increasing its real property transfer tax. Due to state law, that tax is currently capped at $0.55 per $1,000. We can’t increase that figure from $0.55 to the proposed $4-8 per $1,000 proposed under Measure Z unless Measure Y also passes and Benicia thus becomes a limited Charter City. Hence the necessity of voting “Yes” for both proposed measures.

The Opposition: Some Questionable Claims

Certain folks oppose Measures Y and Z. Perhaps you’ve noticed their signs in selected places around town. I’m sure they are sincere in their stance.

Furthermore, I dislike taxes as much as the next guy: As a self-employed person throughout my career, I did not relish the thought of having paid double social security taxes every year.

However, with all due respect, it seems to me that these opponents’ main anti-Y/Z arguments actually undercut their case. Their points are technically true but incomplete and to my mind misleading. That in turn makes me doubt the overall thrust of their contentions.

I’ll accordingly quote and briefly rebut a few of their officially stated claims (as found at the city’s Voting and Election Information site that presents arguments both for and against these two measures):

Opponents’ Claim: “If Measure Y passes, the City can seek to change the charter at any time.”

The Reality: The city government can’t change the charter on its own. Any expansion of the limited charter would require a whole new measure and a whole new vote by Benicians. This would simply be democracy in action.

What’s more, the city has indicated no intention at all to seek to change the proposed limited charter down the line. Measure Y is only for the purposes of instituting a real property transfer tax. Period. It involves nothing else.

The only thing Measure Y  opens the door to, then, is badly needed revenues.

Opponents’ Claim: Once Measure Z passes, City Hall can seek to reduce or eliminate that exemption [for homes selling for up to $2 million].”

The Reality: Again, any reduction or elimination in the $2 million floor for the tax would have to be via a future ballot measure that all of us could vote on.

In addition, any city council member who even proposed such a change could lose their next race and otherwise be ostracized, plus the measure could and almost certainly would be voted down. Again, this is all subject to democracy in action.

Opponents’ Claim: “All three California cities that filed bankruptcy — San Bernardino, Stockton, and Vallejo — were charter cities.”

The Reality: There are 25 cities in the Bay Area alone that are charter cities; only one of them (Vallejo) went bankrupt – due to reasons other than its charter status. And as of 2024, roughly a quarter of California cities are Charter Cities. Many have transfer taxes higher than Measure Z proposes for Benicia. This tax is not the kiss of financial death by any means.

Again, Benicia is not even seeking full charter status. Instead, Measure Y proposes just limited status for the sole purpose of transfer tax revenues.

Opponents’ Claim: “Measure Z would raise [only] $230,000 a year.”

The Reality: The point about Measure Z is not what it yields in the next few years (though it could well be higher than $230,000 per year), but that it sets up Benicia for raising millions of dollars down the line, as various housing, commercial and industrial developments take place that in turn trigger increasing transfer taxes.

Measures Z (and Y) are mainly about fueling a future in which Benicia survives and thrives, not about the past or even the present. Let’s also bear in mind the $1,160,000 that Benicia in effect forfeited from the industrial park sale by virtue of not having the Measure Z transfer tax in place a year ago.

Measure X: Modernizing Our Antiquated Business Tax

Measure X modernizes Benicia’s antiquated business licenses tax structure by, among other things, eliminating taxes for any business (be it a home, office or commercial establishment) making less than $100,000 annually. It also helps the city catch up with many years of inflation. The city council approved it unanimously as a ballot measure.

The upshot is that about 1,900 local businesses will no longer be subject to the tax, with over an additional 2,200 either paying less or no tax during the first year after Measure X is enacted.

For larger enterprises, the tax will be capped at $1,500 per year initially (with the rates of $0.25 to $1.25 per $1,000 in gross receipts, depending on the nature of the business). The rates then increase 10 percent per year up to a maximum of $25,000 annually.

Bear in mind, too, that the maximum would apply only to businesses far larger than the typical Benicia establishment.

A significant additional source of revenue under Measure X will be a separate tax of $3 per $100 on receipts for the Benicia Marine Terminal’s (largely auto-based) business.

The Bottom Line: Vote Yes on X, Y and Z

Benicia faces a big fiscal hole of at least $7.5 million per year, which it is addressing through a combination of budget cuts, operational reorganization and enhanced revenues. In addition, as new residential, commercial and industrial developments are built, police, fire, recreational and infrastructure needs will expand.

We accordingly need to approve additional revenue streams, not just for today but for many tomorrows down the line. Some such streams (as in Measures Y and Z) will impose no cost on the vast majority of us. Others (as in Measure X) are simply reasonable attempts to catch up with inflation and replace an antiquated business tax structure; they even eliminate or decrease taxes on some of us.

In a sense, then, the case for these steps is as simple as a, b, c. So…

PLEASE VOTE YES ON MEASURES X, Y AND Z.


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

Stephen Golub writes about democracy and politics, both in America and abroad, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country.

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

Back to top

Hate Has No Home Here

By Stephen Golub… “Lots of questions swirl around the crime….”

By Stephen Golub, Benicia resident and author, “Benicia and Beyond” column in the Benicia Herald, September 6, 2026

Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub

Perhaps you’ve seen the “Hate Has No Home Here” sign outside some Benicia homes. It signals that the household treasures tolerance over bigotry, inclusion over exclusion, and love over hate.

Benicia made a related statement with our Police Department’s August 31 arrest of Vallejo resident Esa Gabriel Makei for the defacement of the inspiring “Together We Rise” mural, which is located on the alley bordering First Street’s NY2CA Gallery. On the night of August 26, Makei allegedly painted over the part of the mural that specifically highlights such sentiments as love, peace, hope, belonging, kindness, diversity and inclusion.

Makei was identified (and found with a spray paint can inside his car) via the use of surveillance video and Flock license plate reader cameras. An NBC Bay Area article reports that he confessed to the act and “faces charges of felony vandalism and a misdemeanor hate crime.” Kudos to the police for catching the likely culprit.

Lots of questions swirl around the crime. For one thing, since that same spot was defaced in July (though in a different manner), was Makei the perpetrator in both incidents?

Regardless, why did he apparently commit the August 26 crime, especially since he reportedly is himself an artist and muralist? Was something hateful or hurtful going on in his head or life? Was it hate generally directed toward love and the mural’s other positive elements? Or was it particularly aimed against the LGBTQ community, since aspects of the targeted section could be interpreted as especially supporting such groups?

The fact that Makei has been charged with a hate crime could reflect that particular focus. As reported by a fine online Benicia Bridge article (published before the suspect was apprehended), the California Department of Justice defines a hate crime as “a crime against a person, group, or property motivated by the victim’s real or perceived protected social group.” You don’t even have to interpret the vandalism that way to see how un-American the act was; it attacked art, certainly, but also free speech and many values we all share.

The incident itself was certainly not good news. But it is profoundly good that many Benicians have rallied around the mural, as well as around artist Wendy Buresh, who designed the defaced section, and NY2CA owner Vickie Marchand, who commissioned and was a moving force behind this moving, beautiful addition to the Benicia scene and spirit.

Speaking of which, Marchand’s admirable comments on the crime reflect the compassion and tolerance the “Together We Rise” mural embodies. As reported by the Benicia Bridge article, she said that  “I really would love to have a conversation with this person, to kind of say, ‘How can we help you? What can we do so that you have some hope because it seems like it’s gone.’”

That’s not to say that she or others don’t want to see Makei punished if he’s convicted. I certainly do. But perhaps there’s also  a restorative justice angle to pursue – not mutually exclusive with punishment – through which he could give back something positive to the community on which he allegedly unleashed such a hateful act.

For right now, though, we can be thankful that the probable perpetrator was caught, that the great majority of Benicians choose love over hate, and that we have people like Buresh and Marchand to restore the damaged art in the spirit of the rising Phoenix it represents.

As Marchand has observed, “We’re going through an uncertain time in our nation, and this mural was supposed to give hope. It was supposed to be a piece of art that moved you.”

It does give hope and it does move us. Here’s to love triumphing over hate. Here’s to Benicia and America rising to meet our challenges.

Because hate must have no home here.


Benicia resident and author Stephen Golub, A Promised Land

Stephen Golub writes about democracy and politics, both in America and abroad, at A Promised Land: America as a Developing Country.

…and… here’s more Golub on the Benicia Independent

Back to top