BREAKING NEWS from multiple sources (thank you, Google)
[Editor: what with the rash of explosive news of late (Derailments in Alberta on the 14th, Ontario on the 15th, West Virginia on the 16th, and now this refinery explosion in Torrance), I can hardly keep up. Here are Mr. Google’s stories on Torrance. – RS]
Torrance Fire Department Crews Respond To Explosion At … KABC-TV-56 minutes ago Torrance School District officials instructed its 30 schools to shelter in place. Although air quality readings were withing normal range, residents were also …
Video: Flames after explosion reported at Torrance, Calif., ExxonMobil … Photo: Smoke, flames from an explosion at the Exxon Mobil refinery in Torrance, Calif.
One afternoon in late January, Howard Flysher, an avuncular 67-year-old with a neatly trimmed white short-boxed beard, walked the length of the towering …
Southern California authorities say an explosion has occurred at an Exxon Mobil refinery in the city of Torrance, triggering a very large smokestack flare to burn …
TORRANCE, Calif. (AP) — Southern California authorities say an explosion has occurred at an Exxon Mobil refinery in the city of Torrance, triggering a very …
W.Va. oil train derailment was 1 of 3 with safer tank cars
By John Raby & Jonathan Mattise, Feb 18, 2015, UPDATED Feb 18, 2015 1:33pm ET
MOUNT CARBON, W.Va. — The fiery derailment of a train carrying crude oil in West Virginia is one of three in the past year involving tank cars that already meet a higher safety standard than what federal law requires — leading some to suggest even tougher requirements that industry representatives say would be costly.
Hundreds of families were evacuated and nearby water treatment plants were temporarily shut down after cars derailed from a train carrying 3 million gallons of North Dakota crude Monday, shooting fireballs into the sky, leaking oil into a Kanawha River tributary and burning down a house nearby. It was snowing at the time, but it is not yet clear if weather was a factor.
The fire smoldered for a third day Wednesday. State public safety division spokesman Larry Messina said the fire was 85 percent contained.
The train’s tanks were a newer model — the 1232 — designed during safety upgrades voluntarily adopted by the industry four years ago. The same model spilled oil and caught fire in Timmins, Ontario on Saturday, and last year in Lynchburg, Virginia.
A series of ruptures and fires have prompted the administration of President Barack Obama to consider requiring upgrades such as thicker tanks, shields to prevent tankers from crumpling, rollover protections and electronic brakes that could make cars stop simultaneously, rather than slam into each other.
If approved, increased safety requirements now under White House review would phase out tens of thousands of older tank cars being used to carry highly flammable liquids.
“This accident is another reminder of the need to improve the safety of transporting hazardous materials by rail,” said Christopher Hart, acting chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board.
Oil industry officials had been opposed to further upgrading the 1232 cars because of costs. But late last year they changed their position and joined with the railway industry to support some upgrades, although they asked for time to make the improvements.
Oil shipments by rail jumped from 9,500 carloads in 2008 to more than 435,000 in 2013, driven by a boom in the Bakken oil patch of North Dakota and Montana, where pipeline limitations force 70 percent of the crude to move by rail, according to American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers.
The downside: Trains hauling Bakken-region oil have been involved in major accidents in Virginia, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Alabama and Canada, where 47 people were killed by an explosive derailment in 2013 in Lac-Megantic, Quebec.
Reports of leaks and other oil releases from tank cars are up as well, from 12 in 2008 to 186 last year, according to Department of Transportation records reviewed by The Associated Press.
Just Saturday — two days before the West Virginia wreck — 29 cars of a 100-car Canadian National Railway train carrying diluted bitumen crude derailed in a remote area 50 miles south of Timmins, Ontario, spilling oil and catching fire. That train was headed from Alberta to Eastern Canada.
The train Monday was bound for an oil shipping depot in Yorktown, Virginia, along the same route where three tanker cars plunged into the James River in Lynchburg, Virginia, prompting an evacuation last year.
The train derailed near unincorporated Mount Carbon just after passing through Montgomery, a town of 1,946, on a stretch where the rails wind past businesses and homes crowded between the water and the steep, tree-covered hills. All but two of the train’s 109 cars were tank cars, and 26 of them left the tracks.
Fire crews had little choice but to let the tanks burn themselves out. Each carried up to 30,000 gallons of crude.
One person — the owner of the destroyed home — was treated for smoke inhalation, but no other injuries were reported, according to the train company, CSX. The two-person crew, an engineer and conductor, managed to decouple the train’s engines from the wreck behind it and walk away unharmed.
The NTSB said its investigators will compare this wreck to others including Lynchburg and one near Casselton, N.D., when a Bakken crude train created a huge fireball that forced the evacuation of the farming town.
No cause has been determined, said CSX regional vice president Randy Cheetham. He said the tracks had been inspected just three days before the wreck.
“They’ll look at train handling, look at the track, look at the cars. But until they get in there and do their investigation, it’s unwise to do any type of speculation,” he said.
By Tuesday evening, power crews were restoring electricity, water treatment plants were going back online, and most of the local residents were back home. Initial tests showed no crude near water plant intake points, state Environmental Protection spokeswoman Kelley Gillenwater said.
State officials do have some say over rail safety.
Railroads are required by federal order to tell state emergency officials where trains carrying Bakken crude are traveling. CSX and other railroads called this information proprietary, but more than 20 states rejected the industry’s argument, informing the public as well as first-responders about the crude moving through their communities.
West Virginia is among those keeping it secret. State officials responded to an AP Freedom of Information request by releasing documents redacted to remove nearly every detail.
There are no plans to reconsider after this latest derailment, said Melissa Cross, a program manager for the West Virginia Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management.
Contributors include Joan Lowy in Washington, D.C.; Matthew Brown in Billings, Montana; and Pam Ramsey in Charleston, West Virginia. Mattise reported from Charleston.
Repost from CBC News [Editor: New details: carrying tar-sands dilbit; 15 cars released crude oil and seven caught fire; responders letting it burn itself out; oil pooling at the frozen headwaters of a small creek; nearby Mattagami First Nation concerned; expect all trees in the surrounding area to be coated with toxins, some die-off; soil contamination a long range cleanup. – RS]
Gogama oil spill raises concerns about environmental damage
Cleanup continues at the site of a CN train derailment about 30 km northwest of Gogama, Ont.
CBC News, Feb 18, 2015 9:27 AM ET, Updated: Feb 18, 2015 11:57 AM ET
While investigators continue to search for the cause of a CN train Saturday near Gogama, Ont., the environmental impact is becoming more apparent.
Black charred oil tankers lie on their sides in snow stained by crude oil.
CN said the derailed train was carrying diluted bitumen from Alberta to eastern Canada.
Laurentian University professor Charles Ramcharan says that’s one of the worst things that can be spilled.
“The trouble is that it’s very toxic, so if you have a spill it causes a lot of damage and because the bitumen is a solid, it stays on the landscape for a very long time.”
The nearby Mattagami First Nation is also concerned.
Oil is pooling at the frozen headwaters of a small creek near the site of the derailment.
Councillor Jennifer Constant said that waterway leads to her community.
“The impacts may be not immediate, but what are the long-term aspects going to be for people who do utilize the lake and go hunting in the area? They’ve used these lands for time immemorial and they’re worried about the impacts of that,” she said.
“Their health or practices have the potential to be affected by this.”
Contamination, die-off
While CN works with partners to clean up the spill, Ramachran said he worries the incident could fall off the radar because of its remote location.
“Just because there are no immediate human health concerns, I do worry that this one will kind of fall off the radar.”
CN says crews are letting a controlled fire burn out at the site.
Once the dillutants burn off, tar will be left to remove, Ramcharan noted.
He predicted all trees in the surrounding area will be coated with toxins, leading to some die-off. He said the soil will be contaminated as well.
A total of 15 cars released crude oil and seven caught fire when the train went off the tracks late Saturday night.
The Transportation Safety Board is investigating a section of broken rail containing a rail joint and a broken wheel.
The director with Transport Action Ontario, an organization that advocates for transportation improvements, said some kind of mechanical failure might be to blame.
“It’s hard to tell,” Dan Hammond said.
“You know, I would like the investigation to take its course on this one. But things like broken wheels, the industry does not like to see.”
CN said both the train and the track passed safety inspections shortly before the derailment.
Repost from CBC News, Sudbury [Editor: Fires are STILL burning, 4 days later. The type of crude is not identified, although it is coming from Alberta, which would imply tar-sands. Finally, a photo!3 more photos. – RS]
Gogama train derailment: safety of shipping oil by rail questioned
Reducing our dependence on oil means we won’t have to ship as much, university professor says
CBC News Posted: Feb 17, 2015 8:41 AM ET, Last Updated: Feb 17, 2015 1:16 PM ET
A crude oil spill near Gogama is again raising questions about the safety of shipping oil by rail.
A CN train hauling 100 cars derailed late Saturday, causing 29 cars to jump the track and seven to catch fire.
The cause of the derailment is under investigation.
An associate professor at Laurentian University in Sudbury said incidents like this are becoming more common as oil is increasingly shipped by rail.
“You know, we had a spill in Richmond Hill not that long ago, another one in Mississauga,” Charles Ramcharan said.
“So it’s happening even in areas that are heavily populated. It’s only a matter of time before we have a disaster.”
CN said the rail spill is contained on a frozen, snow covered surface, but it’s not yet clear what kind of crude oil was spilled. The train was carrying fuel from Alberta.
‘In the back of their minds’
The secretary of the local services board in Gogama said he can’t help but wonder what might have happened if the train had derailed closer to home.
The rail line runs right through town, Gerry Talbot said.
“I think everybody’s got it in the back of their minds and you sort of try to block it out. We know that the possibility is always there because we did have a derailment right in town back in the ’60’s. So we know that it’s there and that it could happen to us.”
And, he continued, “We’re a lot more conscious of it now, especially since what happened in Quebec [Lac Megantic].”
Nickel Belt MP Claude Gravel raised the issue in the House of Commons on Monday. He said it’s a good thing the frigid weather is keeping the oil from running.
“If this would’ve happened in July, it would’ve been, probably, a total disaster.”
Reduce dependence on oil
With the amount of oil shipped by rail increasing, Ramcharan is convinced that another disaster is possible. The only solution is to reduce our dependence on oil, he said.
“This sort of thing is going to keep happening with increasing frequency, as long as we continue our reliance on these fuels.”
Talbot said the residents in his community are “a lot more conscious of what could happen.”
“I think it’s made us more ready. I think there’s more of a good knowledge that it could happen so there’s less hesitancy from the residents [to escape or take a derailment seriously].”
A spokesperson with CN’s public affairs department says CN’s environmental team continues to work closely with the Ontario Ministry of Environment in the remote, densely wooded area.
Clean up crews are also working with Transport Canada and the Transportation Safety Board “to extinguish the fire, remove all the rail cars, repair the track, conduct a full investigation into the incident and move forward with a comprehensive environmental clean-up.”
The Transportation Safety Board said crews are working to reopen the rail line.
“I would expect that once the site is safe and the fire is under control that they will move ahead with trying to get that line open,” Rob Johnston, a spokesperson with the TSB said.
A spokesperson with the Ministry of the Environment says they have requested CN keep nearby First Nations updated. Health Canada and Environment Canada are have been informed as well, Kate Jordan said in an email.
Ministry staff are attending the command post set up by CN and will be meeting with company response teams for further updates.
“Nearby waterways in the area are frozen over, but we will ensure there are no concerns for environmental impacts off site of the derailment,” she said.
You must be logged in to post a comment.