Tag Archives: Jefferson Ridge

Elizabeth Patterson: A History Trail of Two Cities

Elizabeth Patterson, Benicia Mayor 2007 - present
Elizabeth Patterson, Benicia Mayor 2007 – 2020

By Elizabeth Patterson (Benicia Mayor 2007-2020), January 26, 2026

Introductory Note: Dear Reader, if you are not familiar with Historic Jefferson Ridge, there is a brief description at the end of this editorial. The timeline for the following is uncertain – Santa Rosa project will take at least a year or two.  The Benicia story has been going on for a long time and this is a phase that could end in bull dozing and grading by this year unless there is an appeal to the California Supreme Court.
– Elizabeth Patterson

>> Benicia declares it is a City of History with historic districts and landmarks including the State Capitol and Historic Arsenal.

Santa Rosa is debating development on land of its birthplace – Carrillo Adobe, a historic landmark on private land.

Benicia’s downtown is a State Registered Historic District, and the Historic Arsenal includes four districts listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The area is part of the Delta National Heritage Area and became a state historic landmark in 1935.

Santa Rosa like Benicia must approve housing in numbers that are adopted by each city and approved by the state. [Benicia officials approved housing numbers in excess of state requirements – by about 15% with most of the housing designated in two eastside census tracts].

Decedents of the Santa Rosa Carrillo family and Indigenous people are debating the scale of the project that risks paving over one of the most culturally rich pieces of land not yet developed.

The Carrillo site developer will submit formal plans after listening to the public testimony and the plans will trigger a study of the land’s historical resources and other environmental and traffic reviews. The study will identify mitigation measures to maintain the historic values and cultural resources.

In the early 2000s, Benicia officials approved a private development in the Arsenal Jefferson ridge historic district, citing no significant environmental impacts. Opponents sued and initiated a referendum. Developers refused further environmental review, leading the city council to reverse its decision.

A few years later, Benicia officials created a specific plan and Environmental Impact Report for the Historic Arsenal. The report was recirculated because it lacked an assessment of historic impacts, as required by the State Office of Historic Preservation. The state then mandated detailed mitigation measures to protect viewpoints, preserve historic significance, and maintain the district’s designation by the State and National Parks.

The state Department of Toxic and Substance Control also identified U.S. Army pollution in the lower arsenal to be cleaned up which stalled the certification of the EIR and the specific plan.

The Santa Rosa Carrillo developer is quoted saying they are “evaluating ways to address concerns about views” and that “a substantial portion of the site will remain free of buildings.”

The Jefferson Ridge development in Benicia Arsenal replaces historic views outlined in the City’s 1990 Conservation Plan with buildings that fill the district’s open space. From the 1860s Officers Quarters, the view is now dominated by a wall of the proposed buildings and parking.

While the Carrillo project works with Santa Rosa officials, historians, housing advocates, and Native Americans, the City of Benicia officials accepted the Keith Rogal Jefferson Ridge project as qualifying for staff approval.  Arsenal Protectors testified at the Planning Commission citing the Environmental Impact Report for the Specific Plan, summarizing the long list of mitigation measures and the adopted Historic Arsenal Conservation Plan.

The Arsenal Jefferson Ridge developer Keith Rogal has plenty of experience with historic properties since he is involved in the Sonoma project with historic buildings, wetlands, wildlife and open space.  The county was sued on his inadequate environmental report.  Rogal is currently in more litigation by protectors of historic values, wetlands and open space.

Benicia officials were unmoved by public requests to consider the history of the Jefferson ridge not be erased.  The officials have been asked to consider layers of history that have some mystery to them and is a compelling place to be in the presence of and stand with the view sites mapped by the United States Army.  [You may hear “we had no choice because of SB 35” – b.s].

The 1847 Arsenal is the first on the west coast.  Has the most intact Civil War Era officers’ quarters in the United States (these structures remain, but the context of their being sited on the Jefferson Ridge is lost without the views of the Carquinez Strait as mapped by the Army).  The historic infrastructure of paths and recreation for the officers will be bulldozed.

In fact, contrary to the Benicia Municipal Code stipulating the right to appeal staff decisions, the city officials returned the appeal fee and denied a hearing with city council.

Santa Rosa and Sonoma will consider the history, wetlands and open space and their decisions may not please all, but it will be a public process respecting the concerns of their historic resources.

To date the Protectors of the Arsenal are unsuccessful. They want the public to view Arsenal Jefferson Ridge as it appeared from the 1860s to 1964, in line with its status on the National Register of Historic Places and within the Delta National Heritage Area. However, the city and Rogal will proceed with their project ending preservation efforts and overriding these hopes unless halted by the California Supreme Court.  It’s your history – will it be for future generations?

Elizabeth Patterson, Mayor 2007-2020


1000 Friends Protecting Historic Benicia

The Officers Row District on Jefferson Ridge in the Historic Benicia Arsenal is a well-defined Civil War era historic district listed on the National Register of Historic Places and within the Delta National Heritage Area.  This ridge was initially designated 1847 for an arsenal which is now our Clock Tower.  It has a clear vantage point to watch, guard and if necessary, act against threats.  It provided protection for 1850 gold rush manufacturing of dredgers and other mining needs. 

The historic district exhibits a clear pattern of organization that displays military rank in the arrangement of the officer quarters, retains views of the Strait and sight lines between buildings that were instrumental to the operating a military arsenal, and incorporated parade grounds and exercise grounds in close proximity to the officers’ quarters. 

These relationships are still visible today [it is uncertain for how long now], allowing the public to observe and appreciate the logic of the Army’s design for historic districts of this period.  As evident from the Benicia Arsenal’s record of entry into the National Register of Historic Places, the relationship between individual structures that make up a historic district is what makes it identifiable as a district having historic preservation value.  [Thus, a development that eliminates the relational features and that define an intact historic district and distinguish it from its individual parts would thereby eliminate the district itself – causing the loss of a unique historical structure].

The whole of the Arsenal consisted of approximately 2700 acres of which 235 or so were considered historic and designated by the State in 1935 as a California Landmark.

The Arsenal was a major player in many of the wars including the Civil War (to prevent gold being smuggled to the confederates), the attack on indigenous peoples, a major factor in WW I and WWII and supplied the munitions for the Tokyo raid.  Tanks were cleaned on the lower arsenal streets with tetrachloroethene.  Machine guns and other guns were repaired and reconditioned by as many an 1000 workers a day (mostly women).  It was closed in 1964 without unexploded ordinance cleanup and other pollution except for the Nike missiles.  There was no planning, no transition funds, no infrastructure upgrading – zero. 

The city officials acted with little public advice.  They acted in a manner that earned a law suit which was a major factor for the State Department of Parks and Recreation withdrawing from developing the historic part of the Arsenal as a state park.  The city officials were willing partners with the industrial park investors allowing historic structures to be torn down, and new development inconsistent with the Secretary of Interior standards.  For instance, the oldest Army cemetery in the West is cut off from the public by pipelines; the first Army Hospital west of the Mississippi sold for use by Amports as headquarters.

And here we are:  tourism for cultural and historic resources is popular and brings in revenues to communities.  It does not have to be built.  It is here.  Many former industrial cities in Europe and the United States have rebuilt their economies on tourism.  It is the fastest growing investment a community can make.  The Arsenal – this district specifically – is in the Delta National Heritage Areaa which is managed by the Delta Protection Commission that receives an annual federal funding of $500,000 to implement the Management Plan with policies and programs for tourism for the cultural, historic and natural resource heritage of the area.  But it as if Benicia officials eat their young. 

CALL TO ACTION

There is a good chance the California Supreme Court would take the case because of the legal issues involved.  This is a cultural resource issue not a housing CEQA issue.

Letters to the editor, to city officials are helpful.

Donations to 1000friendsphb.org are essential. You can donate on the web or send check to address listed.  It has been expensive effort to protect the Historic Arsenal.  We get our largest donations from San Francisco individuals and historic societies.  Now there is city that knows the value of history.

 

 

 

Elizabeth Patterson: Lessons from Benicia’s past have implications for Benicia’s near future…

Telling the Tale of the Tail That Wagged the Dog

Elizabeth Patterson, Benicia Mayor 2007 - present
Elizabeth Patterson, Benicia Mayor 2007 – 2020

By Elizabeth Patterson (Benicia Mayor 2007-2020), May 29, 2025

The tale is about Sky Valley development for thousands of homes and businesses. Business as usual with city officials and land developers. “Gotta” build in the next undeveloped land. Need more housing to bring revenues to the city. We must grow more housing to survive. I always wonder how far we need to “grow” – to Fairfield, to Sacramento, to Reno? In other words, it makes no sense to say “we have to grow to survive”. What is the alternative? Let me make a suggestion or two.

When there was city leadership driving the development for Sky Valley (this is the Lake Herman area), residents began to question the collective vision of the city. This city vision is required by the State – known as the General Plan. Bob Berman, a planner and leader for smart growth and open spaces – testified and wrote that Sky Valley was the tail wagging the dog. He campaigned for updating the General Plan that would be the legal vison of the city. This was a pivotal moment for Benicia.

There was a citizen driven petition to stop the Sky Valley project. By a city council one vote margin the city driven development for Sky Valley was scuttled. The city council in the mid 90s by resolution created an advisory task force on the nature and extent of updating the General Plan. And by resolution established a seventeen-member General Plan Oversight Committee (GPOC) to prepare the General Plan.

The GPOC decision making was by consensus during open meetings that were scheduled to encourage public participation. Common and shared values were identified and agreed upon by consensus. Each goal and policy had to meet those common and shared values by consensus. Each legally required element and optional element had to be integrated. A kind of holistic process. The future vision was adopted with clarity and purpose. Each element – housing, transportation, conservation, economic development, heathy community – was driven by sustainable development as the overarching goal.

The Urban Growth Boundary Line restricting urban development replaced the thousands of proposed suburban houses. The Benicia Industrial Park association waged a stellar campaign to prevent changing zoning from light industrial to commercial and mixed use with their focus on expansion for industry along East Second. Their point was to avoid conflict with future residents who would complain about industrial noise, big trucks and other incompatible activities.

The GPOC appointed by the council and made up of voices from every corner of our community was tasked with drafting the general plan. GPOC held nearly a dozen panels of specialists on geology, property rights, economic development, urban design, affordable housing, community health, and hazardous waste to inform the committee and public. We had experts educating citizens so that opportunities and constraints – that is what trained urban and regional planners practice – were known and vetted in public.

So is the potential Valero closure the tail wagging the dog of development? Best to start with what are the objective standards for sustainable development. It sure is not building housing that creates more vehicle trips – in fact there is a state law that says just that.

And what does resiliency mean? Public Resources Code 71360 (Senate Bill 246, 2015) established the Clearinghouse to support holistic, science-based climate resilience decisions, planning, and projects across local communities, regions, and the State. Clearinghouse resources include toolkits and templates, example plans and projects, curated case studies, scientific studies, tools and data, guidance documents, and more.

Lastly, homage to historic downtown Benicia is perfect. There are approximately 482 historic towns and cities in California, though none as special as Benicia. And there is only one Historic Arsenal in California, here in Benicia – which is slated through the congressionally established Delta National Heritage Area as a destination for visitors and residents alike.

The current Benicia General Plan stipulates that goals and policies must meet sustainable development overarching goal. Decision makers for “cohesive new neighborhoods like Rose Estates, [Historic Arsenal] Jefferson Ridge and the Valero property” are not the unifying consensus vision of Benicians. Once again, the tail is wagging the dog of Benicia’s future.

Elizabeth Patterson, Mayor 2007-2020

Benicia Councilmembers Scott and Birdseye on potential Valero closure

To our fellow Benicia Residents and Business owners:

By Benicia Councilmembers Kari Birdseye and Terry Scott, May 27, 2025

This is a pivotal moment in our city’s history. The potential Valero refinery closure isn’t just a challenge—it’s our opportunity to reimagine Benicia’s future.

For decades, Valero has been directly woven into our economic fabric. And, woven directly into being a significant charitable partner.

Now, we must face change. We must look ahead with clarity and purpose.

This transition demands thoughtful planning, which is why Mayor Young has established specialized task forces to guide our path forward. These task forces will focus on economic diversification, sustainable development, and community resilience. Their mission is clear: to mitigate impacts while discovering new possibilities for growth.

The success of this transition depends on inclusivity. We need voices from every corner of our community—businesses, schools, environmental advocates, residents, artists, Bay Area Air District and many others —to participate in this process.

Your insights will shape our economic assessment and redevelopment strategy.

The 940 acres that Valero may leave behind could be the catalyst that will act as a transformative site. But it represents more than land—it may represent Benicia’s next chapter.

This may be our chance to rebuild, reimagine, and reinvent our community for generations to come.

We have received our wake up call as a community. Now it’s time to act. The future belongs to those who prepare for it.

Together, let’s create a Benicia that honors our past while boldly and bravely steps toward a more diverse, sustainable, and resilient tomorrow.

Our challenge is to transform Benicia into a resilient and sustainable community through economic diversification and innovative development, ensuring the prosperity of all residents, businesses and attractive to visitors.

To us the mission is clear: proactively manage the transition brought by potential changes in Valero’s operations by fostering economic resilience, supporting workforce development, and promoting sustainable redevelopment.

We aim to ensure the prosperity and well-being of Benicia’s residents through strategic planning, community engagement, and innovative solutions.

Benicia will be a vibrant, sustainable community where cutting-edge innovation harmonizes with small-town charm.

And finally, we envision a city where green, renewable technologies pioneers work alongside revitalized local businesses. Where our historic downtown thrives as a destination for visitors and residents alike, and where cohesive new neighborhoods like Rose Estates, Jefferson Ridge, and the Valero property reinvention, and others, provide diverse housing options and mixed use housing and retail tied together with micro transit opportunities.

Change is hard. But we must control our destiny.

Terry Scott
Kari Birdseye
Benicia Council Members