Category Archives: City Manager Mario Giuliani

KQED: Benicia Wants to Be a Model for Life After a Refinery. Can It?

A mural depicts downtown Benicia in the city on May 8, 2025. (Beth LaBerge/KQED)

KQED NEWS, By Ericka Cruz Guevarra, Julie Small, Jessica Kariisa, Alan Montecillo, May 20, 2026

Local leaders hope Benicia can be a leading example for how cities transition away from the fossil fuel industry. But with tight city budgets and a global fuel crisis, that’s much easier said than done.

Valero’s Benicia oil refinery employed hundreds of people and contributed millions in taxes to the local government for decades. Now, with the refinery on its way out, local leaders hope Benicia can be a leading example for how cities transition away from the fossil fuel industry. But with tight city budgets and a global fuel crisis, that’s much easier said than done.

Episode Transcript

This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:01:00] I’m Ericka Cruz Guevara and welcome to The Bay, local news to keep you rooted. The city of Benicia has been thinking a lot about its future lately. With fewer than 30,000 residents, this 15.7-square-mile town along the Carquinez Strait has been shaped for decades by the Valero oil refinery, which propped up the local economy, employed hundreds of workers and contributed taxes that paid roughly 10% of the city’s budget. But last month, Valero officially stopped refining crude oil in Benicia. Now, city leaders hope Benicia can be the shining example of a so-called just transition, away from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

Mario Giuliani: [00:01:59] There are eight other communities in California that are home to a refinery, and it’s only a matter of when those communities are gonna have to go through what Benicia’s going through.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:02:12] Today, how Benicia is planning for a future without a refinery and why it’s easier said than done.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:02:26] So Julie, as I understand it, some people have referred to Benicia as a potential poster child for what a quote unquote just transition could look like. First, what is a just transition for those who don’t know what that is? And when did you first hear that in reference to Benicia?

Julie Small: [00:02:49] There’s a lot of definitions for just transition.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:02:52] Julie Small is a reporter for KQED.

Julie Small: [00:02:55] In this case, a just transition is a city moving off its reliance on a fossil fuel industry in such a way that increases the healthiness of the community and the overall standard of living for the community. And it does so in such way that the economy is sustained and diversified and reinvested into clean renewable energies and industries. The first time I heard that term being applied to Benicia was at this February town hall meeting. A hundred people packed into the city library to hear from the city manager, Mario Giuliani.

Mario Giuliani: [00:03:43] We have a great responsibility and honor to be the model community on how we transition

Julie Small: [00:03:52] He told them, you know, this is the plan for how we’re gonna make up for Valero’s departure. We are going to become that poster child for a just transition.

Mario Giuliani: [00:04:02] How do you protect a community that is home to a refinery? And so you don’t decimate that community, but you allow them to springboard to something else. And I think that we’re well positioned to kind of write that playbook

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:04:19] Big words there from the city manager. And also I feel like a really big task, right? Because for context, Benicia’s, as I understand it, entire local economy and city budget relies very heavily on Valero, right? 

Julie Small: [00:04:37] I mean, we’re talking about 10% of the tax revenue that the city collects comes from the Valero refinery. And then there’s all the other industries in the area that build parts or provide services to the refineries. It’s also all the people in town, the restaurants, services leaning heavily on that income.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:05:02] Can you actually remind us, Julie, why Valero is leaving Benicia in the first place?

Julie Small: [00:05:08] The company says it’s leaving because demand for fossil fuel in California is declining, you know, with the rise of renewables and we’re, you know phasing out fossil fuel cars. We’re switching to electrical vehicles. At the same time, regulations on the oil industry are increasing in California as we’re trying to get a handle on controlling emissions and also controlling gas prices. Valero’s CEO has publicly complained about some recent bills that were passed in response to gas price spikes that would have penalized oil companies if they make excessive profits. You know, it’s important to emphasize that although Valero says that’s why they’re leaving, it is part of a trend we’re seeing across the country. Refineries are closing everywhere, so it’s not just unique to California, it not just because we have all these regulations. It’s that these are huge multinational global conglomerates that are maximizing their profit. If they can move their operations overseas where the labor’s cheaper and they have more demand, they’re gonna do it.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:06:22] As I guess Benicia’s preparing for Valero to leave, I imagine there’s been a lot of thinking and talking about what the city would look like without it. So what could a just transition look like in a town like Benicia?

Julie Small: [00:06:39] Well, they definitely want Venetia to be a cleaner town. They don’t want to have new industries come in that are polluting. So they’re looking to get away from this cycle of having to deal with emissions over decades and high asthma rates and high breast cancer rates. So looking for industries that, one, will diversify the economy, so they’re not so dependent on one big company, but also We’ll change the focus. We’ll be actually contributing to California’s goals to become carbon neutral.

Kari Bridseye: [00:07:12] We’re in a very precarious moment right now, but I’m filled with hope because of what we have here.

Julie Small: [00:07:20] I talked to Kari Birdseye, city council member at Benicia, and she’s actually by trade an environmental scientist.

Kari Bridseye: [00:07:28] Anybody that knows me knows that I always talk about the opportunity for the Port of Benicia being involved in standing up the offshore wind industry in California.

Julie Small: [00:07:41] So she’s really excited about the fact that the port in Benicia that is currently used by Valero to export pet coke, which is a byproduct of refining and polluting substance, using that instead as a place where you could manufacture and export parts for the nascent offshore wind industry in California.

Kari Bridseye: [00:08:05] And to me, that’s the perfect scenario for a just transition away from fossil fuels. Let’s be part of the solution instead of the problem.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:08:16] There’s also this question in the city about what to do with the land that the refinery is on as well, right? I mean, it covers like a huge swath of the city.

Julie Small: [00:08:27] Yeah, 900 acres of prime land right there overlooking the Carquinez Strait. It’s beautiful area. It is going to take a while before that land is usable. There’s a buffer zone around the refinery, it’s about 500 acres, that they’re hoping could be redeveloped sooner because it’s not as contaminated as the refineries site itself. They’d like to see that become, you know, housing or businesses that are catering to the local economy. Valero has actually hired a company to repurpose the land, redevelop the land for them. Those proposals are coming in the fall, so we don’t know exactly what that’s gonna be, but there’s a lot you could do with that land. And council member Kari Birdseye talks about this.

Kari Bridseye: [00:09:23] Centrally located, we have two interstates, a rail line, a port. We have so much potential here and it’s my vision to have a very diverse set of businesses and developers come in and be part of our community on the 900 acres that Valero owns right now.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:09:53] Coming up, why Valero’s departure from Benicia is more complicated than it sounds. Stay with us.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:11:07] It does seem like there is a lot of planning and daydreaming about what that future could look like in Benicia. So when exactly is the Valero refinery closing?

Julie Small: [00:11:20] That’s unclear at this moment. They’ve stopped refining. There’s nothing coming out of those stacks. But because of the global fuel crisis and California’s own problem of tightening supply between Valero and the Phillips 66 refinery in Southern California that closed last year, California lost 20% of the fuel that’s refined in the state. So California is looking to make that up. As soon as Valero said they were gonna leave, Governor Newsom, the California Energy Commission did everything they could to get Valero to stay. They couldn’t convince them to keep refining, but they did get them to agree to use their facilities to import refined fuels, store it, and then disperse it, using their pipes to get it to other parts of the state. In a community meeting, the Valero refinery manager said they thinks they probably won’t be there longer than two years, but that was like the only indication of a timeframe.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:12:33] It sounds like parts of the refinery are still being used because of the fact that we still, as a state and a country and I guess a world, still rely very heavily on oil and gas and that this is sort of being also pushed by this global fuel crisis that you’re just talking about. But what does that mean for Benicia? What does that means for the city’s ability to really plan for its future? 

Julie Small: [00:13:03] It makes it very difficult for them to plan. I mean, that’s all they can do at this point is say, well, let’s start planning. Let’s get investors in here. Let’s clean it up. There’s things they can now, like trying to figure out how much it’s gonna cost to clean it. But it really delays their ability to move forward with redevelopment, which is a big part of their financial plan. Having Valero stay in this capacity where they’re not refining. They’re not going to be paying the kind of taxes they were. They’re going to pay some small. So they’re not gonna be offering the benefit they used to, but they’re also gonna be kind of preventing the city from moving forward. And people there are understandably very concerned about that.

Christina Gilpin Hayes: [00:13:50] You know, it’s a catch-22. We might be better off, you know, environmentally, but not so much better off fiscally.

Julie Small: [00:13:57] And I talked to Christina Gilpin Hayes, she’s a resident, but she also serves on the city’s planning commission. She wasn’t like effusive, some people were really excited that Valera was leaving. She wasn’t one of those people. She’s like, look, we knew this was coming. And unfortunately, by them staying on like this, it really hamstrings the city.

Christina Gilpin Hayes: [00:14:17] It just prolongs what we need to happen, you know, either go or don’t, but if you continue to use it as a storage facility, it eliminates the ability for the city to move forward.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:14:34] That’s not even to mention that all of this redevelopment will require a lot of money, I imagine. And we talked at the top about how California more broadly is sort of leading the way and transitioning away from oil and gas and that Benicia isn’t the first city to even try and do it, but it still seems like it’s easier said than done. So what help does exist for cities that are making this transition, Julie?

Julie Small: [00:15:07] Well, one thing that the state has done, we’ll start with the positives, is that they have created this displaced oil and gas worker fund, which basically helps these workers that are being laid off at Valero transition into jobs that match their skill, their expertise, and also offer comparable wages in other industries. They’re also offering $25,000 grants to small businesses affected by the closure of Valero. That’s kind of what’s at the state level. Locally, there’s a lot more. One of the big things that Benicia is hoping to lean on is the Bay Area Air District. Our air regulator has started a new program. It’s taking fines against polluters like Valero and reinvesting those fines back into communities that were affected by emissions. They find Valero 82 million in 2024 for over a decade of excess emissions. And they’re making… 60 million of that available to Benicia and surrounding communities. Benicia’s not sure how much of that money they’re going to get awarded and they won’t know until the fall but they’re hoping to use that money to keep the city government afloat and keep services for the community consistent so that they can handle this transition and they’re pretty confident they’re gonna get a lot of support from the Air District.

[00:16:29] Is it enough for cities and towns like Benicia? Like, how do Benicia residents and officials feel about the support that’s coming from the state and air regulators?

Julie Small: [00:16:40] I think they feel pretty positive about what’s coming from the air regulators. At the state level, you know, they could use a lot more support.

Josh Sonnenfeld: [00:16:49] There’s a lot more that we can and should be doing at the same time.

Julie Small: [00:16:52] I talked to Josh Sonnenfeld with the UC Berkeley Labor Center, and he says most of the emphasis has been on how to show up the fuel supply and not nearly enough on how do we help these refinery towns actually transition.

Josh Sonnenfeld: [00:17:09] For example, California is one of the biggest markets for clean energy products, right? Whether that’s solar panels, EVs, heat pumps. And we have an opportunity to actually build these products in California as well. And so how can we make sure that the inequities of the past century of putting low-income housing and people of color and immigrants next to refineries. That we’re actually undoing some of that damage with the new economy that we are trying to build.

Julie Small: [00:17:41] He says, you know, the state should be doing both. They should be making sure that the fuel supply stays stable, but they could also be helping refinery towns by establishing a state office to facilitate and guide economic transitions, like which other states have done. And also he cited New York State, for example, created something called a tax revenue stabilization fund. It’s basically cash that the state provides to a refinery town to cope with the sudden drop and tax revenues.

Josh Sonnenfeld: [00:18:11] There is opportunity for us to develop something similar in California. But the key is, do it in a way where we’re really, we really need the feedback of local communities about how they wanna transition their economy.

Julie Small: [00:18:24] From my vantage point, I tried to find out what concretely they’re doing and I got just a lot of word salad. But, you know, other people in Benicia feel like they’re more involved in sort of the backroom discussions, feel that the state is with the town and will be helping more going forward.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:18:46] Well, what do you think, Julie, it will take for Benicia to, in fact, become the poster child of a just transition?

Julie Small: [00:18:55] It will take Valero’s departure, the final departure of Valero so that that land can be redeveloped. I really think that that’s the key to their future. I think it’s going to take more support from the state for displaced workers. And also just like Benicia on its own cannot create a new green economy. There’s a lot of effort regionally to create like these green economic zones, manufacturing zones for the green industry. It’s going take programs like that to provide a new identity for Benicia, a new economy. It takes ten years to decontaminate. Refinery site, according to state officials, you know, whose job is it is to do that. And that’s like probably a conservative number.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:19:44] What’s your sense of how city leaders are feeling in Benicia? You think they’re hopeful about their future?

Julie Small: [00:19:51] They are hopeful. I mean, it’s a really great community and it’s really politically active community. I mean in 2016, Valero wanted to bring in oil by rail and that really galvanized people. You know, I left that town hall feeling like a lot of other people probably did, which was like, yes, they can do it. I’ve since become a little more like, wait a minute, you know, they’re relying on a lot of aspects here that are tenuous. But they’re very driven and they have a lot of know-how and a lot chutzpah. Well, you have eight other refinery towns that are gonna be facing this, and having a blueprint that works is gonna make a big difference for them.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:20:41] Well, Julie Small, thank you so much for joining me. I appreciate it.

Julie Small: [00:20:45] Thank you, Ericka.

 


More on the Benicia Independent

 

SF Chronicle: Major Bay Area refinery on track to close, city official says

“The silence is deafening,” Benicia City Manager Mario Giuliani said.

Valero’s refinery in Benicia, seen here in May, is expected to close, Benicia’s city manager said. Lea Suzuki/S.F. Chronicle

San Francisco Chronicle, by Julie Johnson, September 16, 2025

The odds were low. But even so, some Benicia city leaders hoped that California would emerge from the past week’s final lawmaking push for the year with a plan to keep Valero Energy Corp. from shuttering its Bay Area oil refinery next year.

Lawmakers announced big deals on electricity affordabilityoil drilling and climate measures for Gov. Gavin Newsom to either reject or sign. But none dealt directly with a dramatic problem for Benicia: That its biggest taxpayer and employer would soon be abandoning its 900-acre gasoline-making facility on the outskirts of town.

“The silence is deafening,” Benicia City Manager Mario Giuliani said.

California has some of the highest gasoline prices in the country – about $1.47 per gallon higher than the national average as of Tuesday. State officials have been grappling with how to continue transitioning away from fossil fuels without making drivers who don’t have electric cars pay exorbitant gasoline prices.

Last year, Phillips 66 announced it would shutter its facilities in Los Angeles by the end of 2025.

Then in April, Valero alerted California energy regulators that the San Antonio-based company intended “to idle, restructure, or cease refining operations at Valero’s Benicia Refinery by the end of April 2026.”

State law requires refineries to notify the state of any operational changes that might disrupt fuel supplies – and Valero’s departure would certainly be disruptive. The facility produces roughly 8% of the state’s gasoline, a difficult commodity to replace because the state requires a special blend.

During an October earnings call with investors, Valero’s chief executive Lane Riggs discussed California’s “regulatory pressure on the industry,” and foreshadowed the company’s announcement that would come six months later. He said that “all options are on the table” for its California operations and noted that the company had already “minimized” its capital spending in the state.

Valero did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

But Riggs has previously acknowledged “the impact that this may have on our employees, business partners, and community, and will continue to work with them through this period.”

Giuliani said Valero has hired a contractor to work on a redevelopment plan for the site.

Losing both Valero and Phillips 66 meant California stands to lose nearly 20% of its refining capacity. Only seven oil refineries would remain in the state, which requires a special low-carbon blend of gasoline that not all refineries can make.

The closures threatened to make California’s high gasoline prices even higher.

Estimates vary, but many experts put that increase between 5 cents and 10 cents per gallon. They warned that the closures would mean that any unplanned disruptions at other oil refineries – when production stops for repairs or emergencies like fires – could send gas pump prices soaring, albeit temporarily.

By July, state legislatures were considering whether California could pay Valero between $80 million and $200 million to cover Benicia’s maintenance costs and stave off its closure. But those deliberations appear to have gone nowhere, Giuliani said.

“It seems there is now no path that remains for Valero to remain,” he said.

Daniel Barad, western states policy senior manager for the Union of Concerned Scientists, said subsidizing Valero’s refinery operations would require California to be prepared to spend millions more at other refineries too – a complicated commitment given that the state is still committed to transitioning away from fossil fuels.

“It’s important to keep gasoline prices stable as we phase out gasoline,” Barad said. “We have to do everything at the same time.”

Senate Bill 237 could boost the supply of crude oil to the Bay Area’s three refineries – Chevron in Richmond and PBF Energy’s Martinez Refining Co. in Martinez, in addition to Valero. The legislation proposes to increase oil drilling in California, which would potentially send more in-state crude oil for refineries and allow them to operate at higher capacities.

Barad said that is likely not enough to keep Valero open.

Benicia is now preparing to lose more than $10 million in revenue streams out of its $60 million general fund budget. Valero pays about $7.7 million in sales and property taxes to the city. The refinery is also the city’s largest water customer, spending about $3 million annually.

The city has already been dealing with the challenges from stagnant growth and an aging population, Giulliani said. The city of about 26,000 residents hasn’t grown much in the last 25 years.

Kari Birdseye, who serves on Benicia’s city council, said she’s heading up a task force working with local businesses that rely on Valero.

“A lot of local businesses have Valero as their only client – they make specific valves, specific ball bearings, customized equipment,” Birdseye said.

The city is now launching a process to determine which city programs to cut. City officials will compare costs and how many residents each program serves. Giuliani said that from the outset took Valero’s closure announcement seriously and didn’t expect the state to step in. Still, they were holding out hope.

“It’s going to be a significant and seismic shift in the city’s ability to provide services,” Giuliani said.


Julie Johnson is a staff writer covering wildfires, electricity prices, oil refineries and the North Coast of California for the Chronicle.

Julie’s in-depth examination of smoke exposure among wildland firefighters was a Scripps Howard finalist in 2023 for environmental reporting. In 2024, Julie’s investigation into the killing of a Mohawk activist who helped spark the 1969 occupation of Alcatraz Island, written with Jason Fagone, won first place honors from the Online Journalism Awards. Prior to the Chronicle, Julie was a reporter with the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, where she anchored the paper’s coverage of California wildfires awarded the 2018 Pulitzer Prize in breaking news.

Giuliani: ‘Benicia can proceed with refinery closure’

The saga of Benicia’s Valero Refinery may finally have an official end date.

Vallejo Times-Herald, by Thomas Gase, September 15, 2025

Despite legislators working around the clock to reverse the decision, Benicia City Manager Mario Giuliani told the Times-Herald on Monday that, “Benicia can now proceed with the closure of the refinery in April or possibly sooner.”

Last April, Valero Energy Corporation’s subsidiary, Valero Refining Company-California, submitted notice to the California Energy Commission of its intent to idle, restructure, or cease refining operations at the Benicia Refinery by the end of next April.

“State officials have been working feverishly to explore other options since April, but it seems with no new news in the last few days, that the clear option that would make Valero stay didn’t work in their best interests,” Giuliani said. “Certainly as a city manager and longtime resident I’m disappointed that a solution wasn’t made. This is not only going to impact Benicia, but California as well. It’s frustrating, because the city was finally in a position to turn the corner.

“Now we’re going to have significant and seismic changes,” the city manager said.

Giuliani said that there is $60 million in the general fund budget and that it will now have to be reduced by $7.7 million by July. Despite the grim news, Giuliani tried to sound optimistic on Monday.

Benicia City Manager Mario Giuliani

“It’s a problem we’re going to have to solve and it’s certainly difficult,” Giuliani said. “But while a difficult challenge, Benicia has been given the pen to be the author of the next chapters of the cities history.”

The news from Guiliani comes just two days after Assemblymember Lori D. Wilson (D-Suisun City) announced that Senate Bill 237, authored by state Sen. Tim Grayson, passed the California State Assembly with broad bipartisan support in a 63–4 vote and passed in the Senate in a 28–0 vote. That bill now heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk.

SB 237 responds to the state’s shifting energy landscape, where refinery closures, declining gasoline demand, and reliance on imports have left families, workers, and communities vulnerable.

Assemblymember Lori Wilson

“As the representative for Benicia, I know firsthand the impact refinery closures have on local economies, union workers, and small businesses,” said Wilson in a news release. “SB 237 is about managing change responsibly while protecting California families, workers, and communities. The closure of the Valero refinery means the loss of thousands of good-paying jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in local economic activity.”

Valero Energy Corporation has owned and operated the Benicia Refinery since 2000. The refinery was originally built for Humble Oil, later called Exxon. Construction of the facility began in 1968 and was completed in 1969.

Valero Energy Corporation, through its subsidiaries (collectively, Valero), is a multinational manufacturer and marketer of petroleum-based and low-carbon liquid transportation fuels and petrochemical products, and sells its products primarily in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Latin America.

Valero owns 15 petroleum refineries located in the United States, Canada and the UK with a combined throughput capacity of approximately 3.2 million barrels per day.

Valero Headquarters in San Antonio, and has more than 9,900 employees, with approximately 400 at the Benicia venue. That refinery has a throughput capacity of 170,000 barrels per day, according to the company. According to a list from the California Energy Commission, Benicia has 8.94 percent of the state’s crude oil capacity.

“We understand the impact that this may have on our employees, business partners, and community, and will continue to work with them through this period,” said Lane Riggs, Chairman, CEO and President of Valero.

Meanwhile, Wilson’s legislation aims to strengthen safety standards for offshore oil and gas pipelines, directs state agencies to evaluate consumer protections at the pump, prohibits drilling permits in health protection zones, and takes steps to stabilize gasoline prices for California families.

SB 237 also directs the California Energy Commission, in consultation with the Air Resources Board, to explore temporary suspensions of the state’s summer gasoline blend if it would protect consumers from significant price increases. In addition, the Energy Commission is tasked with studying the potential for a western regional gasoline blend to stabilize markets and submitting recommendations to the Legislature on strategies for a safe, equitable, and affordable transition away from fossil fuels.

The Valero Refinery in Benicia was one of four refineries in the SF Bay Area that did not meet air quality requirements for compliance with the Bay Area Quality Management District in 2023. (Chris Riley/Times-Herald file)

While Valero is a big part of Benicia business, is it not without its critics — particularly after the refinery became the site of a series of air pollution incidents. This includes a hydrogen vent at the refinery that had been leaking 2.7 tons of toxics into the air for 15 years. That discovery resulted in an historic $84 million fine imposed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (an oversight agency) in 2024.

Critics also point to inspectors reporting that Valero management had known about the leaks for years, but failed to report them or take steps to mitigate the leak. The fine reportedly was the largest penalty ever assessed by the district.

Valero was one of four other refineries that in 2023 didn’t meet requirements as defined by BAAQMD and Rule 12-15. That rule — passed in 2016 — requires refineries to monitor and report fugitive gasses from their operating equipment, such as valves, compressors, and storage tanks. These emissions impact the health of the surrounding communities — the toxic gases released include noxious chemicals like the cancer-causing benzene.

The Benicia City Council on April 2 voted 5-0 on a safety ordinance that aims to help protect Benicians against potential fires, explosions and toxic emissions connected to the Valero Refinery and other facilities causing health concerns in the city. Before the vote, Benicia was previously the only Bay Area refinery town to not yet have an Industrial Safety Ordinance.

However, the Benicia City Manager said that the Benicia City Council passing an Industrial Safety Ordinance 5-0 earlier in April was a separate entity and that the reasons for the possible departure had more economic and political reasons.

“There has been a sale in the works for some time with Valero, so I don’t believe the passage of the ordinance has anything to do with this,” Giuliani said in April. “San Antonio has highlighted some trust issues for some time, so to that extent this news isn’t shocking. When Valero announced a sale, we had heard rumors for some time … However, the news that they might be leaving entirely, that is shocking.”