Category Archives: Bay Area Air District

KQED: Benicia Wants to Be a Model for Life After a Refinery. Can It?

A mural depicts downtown Benicia in the city on May 8, 2025. (Beth LaBerge/KQED)

KQED NEWS, By Ericka Cruz Guevarra, Julie Small, Jessica Kariisa, Alan Montecillo, May 20, 2026

Local leaders hope Benicia can be a leading example for how cities transition away from the fossil fuel industry. But with tight city budgets and a global fuel crisis, that’s much easier said than done.

Valero’s Benicia oil refinery employed hundreds of people and contributed millions in taxes to the local government for decades. Now, with the refinery on its way out, local leaders hope Benicia can be a leading example for how cities transition away from the fossil fuel industry. But with tight city budgets and a global fuel crisis, that’s much easier said than done.

Episode Transcript

This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:01:00] I’m Ericka Cruz Guevara and welcome to The Bay, local news to keep you rooted. The city of Benicia has been thinking a lot about its future lately. With fewer than 30,000 residents, this 15.7-square-mile town along the Carquinez Strait has been shaped for decades by the Valero oil refinery, which propped up the local economy, employed hundreds of workers and contributed taxes that paid roughly 10% of the city’s budget. But last month, Valero officially stopped refining crude oil in Benicia. Now, city leaders hope Benicia can be the shining example of a so-called just transition, away from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

Mario Giuliani: [00:01:59] There are eight other communities in California that are home to a refinery, and it’s only a matter of when those communities are gonna have to go through what Benicia’s going through.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:02:12] Today, how Benicia is planning for a future without a refinery and why it’s easier said than done.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:02:26] So Julie, as I understand it, some people have referred to Benicia as a potential poster child for what a quote unquote just transition could look like. First, what is a just transition for those who don’t know what that is? And when did you first hear that in reference to Benicia?

Julie Small: [00:02:49] There’s a lot of definitions for just transition.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:02:52] Julie Small is a reporter for KQED.

Julie Small: [00:02:55] In this case, a just transition is a city moving off its reliance on a fossil fuel industry in such a way that increases the healthiness of the community and the overall standard of living for the community. And it does so in such way that the economy is sustained and diversified and reinvested into clean renewable energies and industries. The first time I heard that term being applied to Benicia was at this February town hall meeting. A hundred people packed into the city library to hear from the city manager, Mario Giuliani.

Mario Giuliani: [00:03:43] We have a great responsibility and honor to be the model community on how we transition

Julie Small: [00:03:52] He told them, you know, this is the plan for how we’re gonna make up for Valero’s departure. We are going to become that poster child for a just transition.

Mario Giuliani: [00:04:02] How do you protect a community that is home to a refinery? And so you don’t decimate that community, but you allow them to springboard to something else. And I think that we’re well positioned to kind of write that playbook

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:04:19] Big words there from the city manager. And also I feel like a really big task, right? Because for context, Benicia’s, as I understand it, entire local economy and city budget relies very heavily on Valero, right? 

Julie Small: [00:04:37] I mean, we’re talking about 10% of the tax revenue that the city collects comes from the Valero refinery. And then there’s all the other industries in the area that build parts or provide services to the refineries. It’s also all the people in town, the restaurants, services leaning heavily on that income.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:05:02] Can you actually remind us, Julie, why Valero is leaving Benicia in the first place?

Julie Small: [00:05:08] The company says it’s leaving because demand for fossil fuel in California is declining, you know, with the rise of renewables and we’re, you know phasing out fossil fuel cars. We’re switching to electrical vehicles. At the same time, regulations on the oil industry are increasing in California as we’re trying to get a handle on controlling emissions and also controlling gas prices. Valero’s CEO has publicly complained about some recent bills that were passed in response to gas price spikes that would have penalized oil companies if they make excessive profits. You know, it’s important to emphasize that although Valero says that’s why they’re leaving, it is part of a trend we’re seeing across the country. Refineries are closing everywhere, so it’s not just unique to California, it not just because we have all these regulations. It’s that these are huge multinational global conglomerates that are maximizing their profit. If they can move their operations overseas where the labor’s cheaper and they have more demand, they’re gonna do it.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:06:22] As I guess Benicia’s preparing for Valero to leave, I imagine there’s been a lot of thinking and talking about what the city would look like without it. So what could a just transition look like in a town like Benicia?

Julie Small: [00:06:39] Well, they definitely want Venetia to be a cleaner town. They don’t want to have new industries come in that are polluting. So they’re looking to get away from this cycle of having to deal with emissions over decades and high asthma rates and high breast cancer rates. So looking for industries that, one, will diversify the economy, so they’re not so dependent on one big company, but also We’ll change the focus. We’ll be actually contributing to California’s goals to become carbon neutral.

Kari Bridseye: [00:07:12] We’re in a very precarious moment right now, but I’m filled with hope because of what we have here.

Julie Small: [00:07:20] I talked to Kari Birdseye, city council member at Benicia, and she’s actually by trade an environmental scientist.

Kari Bridseye: [00:07:28] Anybody that knows me knows that I always talk about the opportunity for the Port of Benicia being involved in standing up the offshore wind industry in California.

Julie Small: [00:07:41] So she’s really excited about the fact that the port in Benicia that is currently used by Valero to export pet coke, which is a byproduct of refining and polluting substance, using that instead as a place where you could manufacture and export parts for the nascent offshore wind industry in California.

Kari Bridseye: [00:08:05] And to me, that’s the perfect scenario for a just transition away from fossil fuels. Let’s be part of the solution instead of the problem.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:08:16] There’s also this question in the city about what to do with the land that the refinery is on as well, right? I mean, it covers like a huge swath of the city.

Julie Small: [00:08:27] Yeah, 900 acres of prime land right there overlooking the Carquinez Strait. It’s beautiful area. It is going to take a while before that land is usable. There’s a buffer zone around the refinery, it’s about 500 acres, that they’re hoping could be redeveloped sooner because it’s not as contaminated as the refineries site itself. They’d like to see that become, you know, housing or businesses that are catering to the local economy. Valero has actually hired a company to repurpose the land, redevelop the land for them. Those proposals are coming in the fall, so we don’t know exactly what that’s gonna be, but there’s a lot you could do with that land. And council member Kari Birdseye talks about this.

Kari Bridseye: [00:09:23] Centrally located, we have two interstates, a rail line, a port. We have so much potential here and it’s my vision to have a very diverse set of businesses and developers come in and be part of our community on the 900 acres that Valero owns right now.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:09:53] Coming up, why Valero’s departure from Benicia is more complicated than it sounds. Stay with us.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:11:07] It does seem like there is a lot of planning and daydreaming about what that future could look like in Benicia. So when exactly is the Valero refinery closing?

Julie Small: [00:11:20] That’s unclear at this moment. They’ve stopped refining. There’s nothing coming out of those stacks. But because of the global fuel crisis and California’s own problem of tightening supply between Valero and the Phillips 66 refinery in Southern California that closed last year, California lost 20% of the fuel that’s refined in the state. So California is looking to make that up. As soon as Valero said they were gonna leave, Governor Newsom, the California Energy Commission did everything they could to get Valero to stay. They couldn’t convince them to keep refining, but they did get them to agree to use their facilities to import refined fuels, store it, and then disperse it, using their pipes to get it to other parts of the state. In a community meeting, the Valero refinery manager said they thinks they probably won’t be there longer than two years, but that was like the only indication of a timeframe.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:12:33] It sounds like parts of the refinery are still being used because of the fact that we still, as a state and a country and I guess a world, still rely very heavily on oil and gas and that this is sort of being also pushed by this global fuel crisis that you’re just talking about. But what does that mean for Benicia? What does that means for the city’s ability to really plan for its future? 

Julie Small: [00:13:03] It makes it very difficult for them to plan. I mean, that’s all they can do at this point is say, well, let’s start planning. Let’s get investors in here. Let’s clean it up. There’s things they can now, like trying to figure out how much it’s gonna cost to clean it. But it really delays their ability to move forward with redevelopment, which is a big part of their financial plan. Having Valero stay in this capacity where they’re not refining. They’re not going to be paying the kind of taxes they were. They’re going to pay some small. So they’re not gonna be offering the benefit they used to, but they’re also gonna be kind of preventing the city from moving forward. And people there are understandably very concerned about that.

Christina Gilpin Hayes: [00:13:50] You know, it’s a catch-22. We might be better off, you know, environmentally, but not so much better off fiscally.

Julie Small: [00:13:57] And I talked to Christina Gilpin Hayes, she’s a resident, but she also serves on the city’s planning commission. She wasn’t like effusive, some people were really excited that Valera was leaving. She wasn’t one of those people. She’s like, look, we knew this was coming. And unfortunately, by them staying on like this, it really hamstrings the city.

Christina Gilpin Hayes: [00:14:17] It just prolongs what we need to happen, you know, either go or don’t, but if you continue to use it as a storage facility, it eliminates the ability for the city to move forward.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:14:34] That’s not even to mention that all of this redevelopment will require a lot of money, I imagine. And we talked at the top about how California more broadly is sort of leading the way and transitioning away from oil and gas and that Benicia isn’t the first city to even try and do it, but it still seems like it’s easier said than done. So what help does exist for cities that are making this transition, Julie?

Julie Small: [00:15:07] Well, one thing that the state has done, we’ll start with the positives, is that they have created this displaced oil and gas worker fund, which basically helps these workers that are being laid off at Valero transition into jobs that match their skill, their expertise, and also offer comparable wages in other industries. They’re also offering $25,000 grants to small businesses affected by the closure of Valero. That’s kind of what’s at the state level. Locally, there’s a lot more. One of the big things that Benicia is hoping to lean on is the Bay Area Air District. Our air regulator has started a new program. It’s taking fines against polluters like Valero and reinvesting those fines back into communities that were affected by emissions. They find Valero 82 million in 2024 for over a decade of excess emissions. And they’re making… 60 million of that available to Benicia and surrounding communities. Benicia’s not sure how much of that money they’re going to get awarded and they won’t know until the fall but they’re hoping to use that money to keep the city government afloat and keep services for the community consistent so that they can handle this transition and they’re pretty confident they’re gonna get a lot of support from the Air District.

[00:16:29] Is it enough for cities and towns like Benicia? Like, how do Benicia residents and officials feel about the support that’s coming from the state and air regulators?

Julie Small: [00:16:40] I think they feel pretty positive about what’s coming from the air regulators. At the state level, you know, they could use a lot more support.

Josh Sonnenfeld: [00:16:49] There’s a lot more that we can and should be doing at the same time.

Julie Small: [00:16:52] I talked to Josh Sonnenfeld with the UC Berkeley Labor Center, and he says most of the emphasis has been on how to show up the fuel supply and not nearly enough on how do we help these refinery towns actually transition.

Josh Sonnenfeld: [00:17:09] For example, California is one of the biggest markets for clean energy products, right? Whether that’s solar panels, EVs, heat pumps. And we have an opportunity to actually build these products in California as well. And so how can we make sure that the inequities of the past century of putting low-income housing and people of color and immigrants next to refineries. That we’re actually undoing some of that damage with the new economy that we are trying to build.

Julie Small: [00:17:41] He says, you know, the state should be doing both. They should be making sure that the fuel supply stays stable, but they could also be helping refinery towns by establishing a state office to facilitate and guide economic transitions, like which other states have done. And also he cited New York State, for example, created something called a tax revenue stabilization fund. It’s basically cash that the state provides to a refinery town to cope with the sudden drop and tax revenues.

Josh Sonnenfeld: [00:18:11] There is opportunity for us to develop something similar in California. But the key is, do it in a way where we’re really, we really need the feedback of local communities about how they wanna transition their economy.

Julie Small: [00:18:24] From my vantage point, I tried to find out what concretely they’re doing and I got just a lot of word salad. But, you know, other people in Benicia feel like they’re more involved in sort of the backroom discussions, feel that the state is with the town and will be helping more going forward.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:18:46] Well, what do you think, Julie, it will take for Benicia to, in fact, become the poster child of a just transition?

Julie Small: [00:18:55] It will take Valero’s departure, the final departure of Valero so that that land can be redeveloped. I really think that that’s the key to their future. I think it’s going to take more support from the state for displaced workers. And also just like Benicia on its own cannot create a new green economy. There’s a lot of effort regionally to create like these green economic zones, manufacturing zones for the green industry. It’s going take programs like that to provide a new identity for Benicia, a new economy. It takes ten years to decontaminate. Refinery site, according to state officials, you know, whose job is it is to do that. And that’s like probably a conservative number.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:19:44] What’s your sense of how city leaders are feeling in Benicia? You think they’re hopeful about their future?

Julie Small: [00:19:51] They are hopeful. I mean, it’s a really great community and it’s really politically active community. I mean in 2016, Valero wanted to bring in oil by rail and that really galvanized people. You know, I left that town hall feeling like a lot of other people probably did, which was like, yes, they can do it. I’ve since become a little more like, wait a minute, you know, they’re relying on a lot of aspects here that are tenuous. But they’re very driven and they have a lot of know-how and a lot chutzpah. Well, you have eight other refinery towns that are gonna be facing this, and having a blueprint that works is gonna make a big difference for them.

Ericka Cruz Guevarra: [00:20:41] Well, Julie Small, thank you so much for joining me. I appreciate it.

Julie Small: [00:20:45] Thank you, Ericka.

 


More on the Benicia Independent

 

KQED: California’s Fuel Fears Threaten Benicia’s ‘Just Transition’ to Green Economy

The waterfront in Benicia on April 24, 2026. State leaders negotiated an agreement with Valero this year to use its idled Benicia facility to store and transport imported fuel, which brings little economic activity while freezing redevelopment plans. (Martin do Nascimento/KQED)

KQED NEWS, BY Julie Small, Apr 30, 2026

In the city of Benicia on the bank of the Carquinez Strait, the view has fundamentally changed: smoke, steam, and black soot no longer spiral from the stacks of the Valero refinery, which stopped refining crude oil in April. So why are residents holding their breath?

With the shuttering of the refinery, Benicia became the latest test case for California’s promise of a “just transition” from fossil fuels to renewable energy that protects workers’wages and livelihoods, invests in economically disadvantaged communities and reduces pollution impacts on the most vulnerable communities. Many Benicians are optimistic they have the assets and the know-how to succeed. But in a politically charged environment where gasoline prices are spiraling higher, California’s shifting interests threaten to delay any rebirth of the city.

State leaders negotiated an agreement with Valero this year to use its idled Benicia facility to store and transport imported fuel, which brings little economic activity while freezing redevelopment plans.

For more than half a century, Benicia’s economy and identity have depended on oil production. Valero’s 400-plus employees, a quarter of whom lived in town, spent some of their paychecks at First Street’s bars and restaurants, which also served hundreds more workers contracted for maintenance each year. Local businesses provided equipment, parts and services to Valero and must find a new market — or pivot to make a new product. Benicia businesses expect the ripple effects of the refinery closure to devastate livelihoods.

The closure was expected. California established its goal to completely phase out fossil fuels to combat global warming more than a decade ago. But Benicia is losing its largest taxpayer much sooner than the city can afford.

Valero’s refinery shutdown will cost Benicia an estimated $10.8 million annually in tax revenues, about 13% of the city’s general fund budget. The city manager reassured residents at a packed February town hall that they could still count on city services funded by $3 million in cash reserves. The city planned to sell water that Valero used, half the city’s supply, to other businesses, and applied for millions of dollars worth of community grants from the Bay Area Air District to sustain staff.

The Martinez Refining Company is seen across the Carquinez Strait from Benicia, on April 13, 2026, as regional refining operations face uncertainty amid California’s transition away from fossil fuels. (Gustavo Hernandez/KQED)

In the long term, Benecia’s leaders are banking on redevelopment of Valero’s 900 acres to bring new tax revenue and vitalize the local economy.

Nearly 500 of those acres were a buffer to mitigate risks of explosions, fires, emissions and other pollution. The land could be developed sooner than the land under the refinery itself, which state regulators expect could take ten years to clean up.

“I wanna see dismantling and movement into our future,” said Kari Birdseye, a Benicia city council member, “I’m not sure that’s the vision that the state has right now because of the precarious nature of our petroleum situation.”

California state leaders have primarily focused on stabilizing fuel supply and keeping gas prices from spiraling out of control.

On April 16, 2025, Valero announced it planned to idle, restructure, or cease refining operations in Benicia. This came six months after Phillips 66 declared its plans to stop refining in Wilmington, Los Angeles, by the year’s end.

At the time, these facilities comprised nearly 20% of California’s refining capacity. The closures threatened to push oil prices higher — a political and economic disaster in a state where gasoline historically costs $0.90 more per gallon than the national average, according to the U.S. Energy and Information Administration.

Gov. Gavin Newsom responded to Valero’s announcement with a letter dated April 21 to the California Energy Commission, directing the state agency responsible for sustaining fuel supply to “redouble its efforts” with “high-level immediate engagement, to help ensure that Californians continue to have access to a safe, affordable, and reliable supply of transportation fuels.”

A month later, Siva Gunda, vice chair of the energy commission, recommended easing regulations to increase fuel imports and local production. Many of the suggestions were enacted with the passage of SB 237 in September.

Environmentalists criticized the legislative changes as an oil industry wish list. They waived California’s requirement to switch to a lower emission fuel in summer months, exempted some oil and gas well permits from final environmental review, and paused penalties on excessive oil profits that lawmakers created to prevent price gouging.

None of the changes persuaded Valero to keep refining in Benicia. However, in January, the company agreed to import gasoline to meet its obligations to the state.

The Valero refinery in Benicia on Sept. 21, 2023. (Martin do Nascimento/KQED)

Benicia officials said they have not been in negotiations between the state and Valero. But Lauren Bird, the facilities general manager, told the Citizens’ Advisory Panel on April 17 that the refinery will import, store and transport gas and diesel for about two years, though it will no longer import jet fuel.

Using Valero’s facility for imports provides little economic benefit to Benicia and delays redevelopment of 900 acres of prime real estate.

“It basically eliminates our ability to have any new development on the property,” said Christina Gilpin-Hayes, a resident who serves on with the city’s planning commission. “Nobody’s gonna want it. Even the land that’s the buffer acres, nobody’s gonna want to develop there if [Valero] is still using it.”

An energy commission spokesperson could not discuss the talks due to industry confidentiality rules, but said in an email that the agency is working with Benicia and stakeholders on alternatives for the facility.

A mural depicting historic downtown Benicia is seen along First Street on April 28, 2026, in Benicia. (Gustavo Hernandez/KQED)

Some residents have called it a back-door deal and said they worry imported gasoline is a fire safety risk.

“What is the state gonna do for us given that they’re imposing this?” said Marilyn Bardet, a member of the community advisory panel, at the February town hall.

Gunda declined KQED’s request for an interview. But said at a state Senate committee hearing on Feb. 18 that much of the energy commission’s work in the last year was aimed at keeping gasoline costs from rising above $5 a gallon, which worked until the U.S. war with Iran pushed up prices globally.

Gunda urged lawmakers to turn to mitigating the economic impacts of refinery closures.

“These unplanned, disruptive closures could have incredible impacts on the workers and the communities,” Gunda said. “It’s really important … to make sure we have the policies in place to support the transition in a way that we protect Californians.”

“ I’d like to think that some of these strategies are forthcoming,” said Josh Sonnenfeld, a senior researcher at UC Berkeley Labor Center. “Given this is the sixth refinery closure or conversion [in six years], I think we need to pick up our pace here.”

Sonnenfeld previously worked for the Blue Green Alliance, which helped Contra Costa County mitigate the 2020 conversion of the Marathon Refinery to renewable diesel. That change cost 700 refinery workers well-paid union jobs. In response, state lawmakers established the Displaced Oil and Gas Workers Fund to help pay for training and job searches.

The Workforce Development Board of Solano County received $3 million from the fund last year to help laid-off Valero workers, and is offering up to $25,000 in grants to small businesses affected by the closure. Advocates have lobbied to extend and expand the fund, as its authorization sunsets in 2027.

Sonnefeld thinks California leaders should look to other states as examples. For instance, New York created a tax stabilization fund for refinery towns and cities to make up for the sudden loss of refinery dollars, while Michigan and Minnesota each established a community transition office.

“We haven’t set up that infrastructure yet in California around whose job is it to make sure that workers and communities are successfully transitioning,” Sonnenfeld said. “In California, we don’t want to acknowledge that they’re actually folks that are being hurt by the energy transition.”

A visitor walks along First Street near the waterfront on April 28, 2026, in Benicia. (Gustavo Hernandez/KQED)

Sonnenfeld said regional governments have shouldered more of the responsibility for mitigating the impact of refinery closures.

The Bay Area Air District launched a first-of-a-kind program this year where regulatory fines against polluters will be passed on to affected communities in the form of grants.

The air regulator issued $82 million in fines against Valero in 2024 for over a decade of excess emissions at the Benicia refinery, which will provide some $60 million in funding.

Benicia plans to seek up to $43 million of the grants, which are also open to local businesses. Applications are due in May, and the awards are expected to be announced in September. That’s the same month that Signature Development, the company Valero hired to manage the sale of refinery land, is expected to present plans to repurpose the property to the city council for approval.

The waterfront in Benicia on April 24, 2026. (Martin do Nascimento/KQED)

Until then, Benicia is on a white-knuckle transition trying to jumpstart a new, green economy without knowing when Valero will leave, or how long it will take to decontaminate and repurpose the refinery site.

The state legislature is considering a bill to help California’s eight remaining refinery towns plan better. SB 1259 would require refineries to plan for decommissioning and estimate the costs and timeline for cleaning up after a closure.

Birdseye said the legislation wouldn’t benefit Benicia.

“We’re in a very precarious moment,” Birdseye said. “ But I’m filled with hope because of what we have here.”

Kari Birdseye, a Benicia City Council member, stands overlooking Benicia’s marine oil terminal near the site of the Benicia Clocktower, on April 13, 2026, in Benicia, as the city prepares for the closure of the Valero refinery and the loss of roughly 10 percent of its annual tax revenue. (Gustavo Hernandez/KQED)

Birdseye said businesses have inquired about moving to Benicia for its central location between two interstate highways, with a rail line and port.

From the city’s old clock tower, Birdseye gestured to a berth below, where Valero had exported petroleum coke, a black dust that’s a refining byproduct and a health hazard. She said a federal agency, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, has identified the port as a possible supply chain and manufacturing site for the nascent offshore wind industry in California.

“We can put these large pieces of equipment on ships that go out the Golden Gate and either go down to the Port of Long Beach, Morro Bay or up to Humboldt, where they can be assembled into wind turbines,” Birdseye said. “That’s the perfect scenario for a just transition away from fossil fuels.”

On a recent afternoon at Benicia’s waterfront, resident Stephen Golub said one thing lost in the economic discussions about Valero’s departure is the gains in environmental and public health.

Stephen Golub, a Benicia resident, poses for a portrait along the waterfront on April 28, 2026, in Benicia. (Gustavo Hernandez/KQED)

“They were polluting our air again and again, sometimes secretly, sometimes more openly,” Golub said. “They were poisoning our politics by pouring massive funds into political campaigns.”

Golub said without a refinery, it’s easier to enjoy all that Benicia has to offer, including 28 public parks, stable political leadership, a vibrant art scene, good schools and safe streets.

“Down the line, maybe 10 or 20 years, people will talk about this thriving community with all it has to offer, and they’ll say, ‘Hey, did you know that there was once a refinery here?’” Golub said.“I really think that’s what’s in the city’s future.”


More on the Benicia Independent

 

Valero fined another $3.25 million for 118 air quality violations at Benicia refinery

Air District will require Valero to expand fenceline monitoring program after “significant incidents” that polluted surrounded community, including a gasoil release in Dec. 2021

The Valero refinery, seen in this archival photo, has been idled but new fenceline monitors are slated to be installed in surrounding areas. (Adobe)

The Benicia Bridge, By Monica Vaughan, April  28, 2026

Valero Refining Company has agreed to pay an additional $3,250,000 penalty for air quality violations related to its now-idled Benicia refinery in a new settlement with the Bay Area Air District announced Tuesday.  

The settlement resolves 118 notices issued by the air pollution regulator for violations that occurred between 2019 and 2023, according to Kristine Roselius, a spokesperson for the Air District. In addition to the penalty, Valero will be required to expand its fenceline air quality monitoring program, and provide public access to and reporting of the monitoring data.

The pollution emitted during that period includes particulate matter, butane and sulfur-related pollutants, Roselius told The Benicia Bridge.  […continued on The Benicia Bridge (including Q&A with spokesperson for the the Air District)…]


Reposted with permission, The Benicia Bridge
Excellent reporting from Benicia’s newest award-winning journalism duo, Monica Vaughan and Laura López González. – Roger Straw
Learn more and subscribe to the newsletter here.

Back to top.

Benicia’s Terry Scott: Local Community Benefits Fund Round 1 Guideline Changes Explained

IMPORTANT UPDATE on January 28, from Benicia Mayor Steve Young: “This morning the Board of the Bay Area Air District unanimously approved the revised guidelines for use of the penalty funds. This is a huge win for the community and will allow the City and nonprofit organizations to apply for up to $60 million for eligible projects.”
Read Terry Scott below for details…

Benicia Exempted from Traditional Application Process in Major Win for City

By Terry Scott, Benicia City Councilmember, January 23, 2026

Benicia City Councilmember Terry Scott.

On January 14, The Bay Area Air District released revised guidelines for penalty fund grants after months of public hearings, discussions and significant personal lobbying efforts by Mayor Steve Young.

We’re very pleased to report the Air District  has made significant modifications to its Local Community Benefits Fund Round 1 guidelines, creating special exemptions for Benicia in recognition of the extraordinary economic challenges facing the city following Valero’s refinery closure.

In these recently released Call for Project Guidelines, the Air District clearly states that “Valero Refining Company announced that it would close the Benicia refinery in 2026.” According to the Air District, “while the refinery closure will bring improvements in air quality, the sudden nature of the refinery closure will also create immediate adverse economic impacts, including job losses for refinery workers and loss of direct and indirect tax revenue for local government entities.”

“Due to the ongoing strain on Benicia’s community, civic, and organizational capacity resulting from the impending refinery closure, the Air District is making unprecedented exceptions for Catalyst Grant (up to $40 million) applications for Benicia.”

As a quick recap, The Local Community Benefits Fund Program Goals are to:
  • Reduce air pollution or mitigate its impacts, improve public health outcomes, and build economic resilience for a just transition away from the harmful effects of afossil-fuel-based economy.
  • Advance integrated projects to holistically meet community needs.
  • Strengthen community-led and collaborative solutions.

This Call for Projects requests project proposals from eligible applicants in Benicia and surrounding communities.

There are in total three Grant Levels including Catalyst, Opportunity and Seed. As noted the City will be applying for the largest funding which is the Catalyst Grant; process and programs proposed for the Catalyst Grant will be vetted most likely by the community Sustainability commission and the ISO oversight commission.

There will be ample opportunity for local non-profits to apply for Opportunity Grants of between $500,000 and $5 million, or Seed Grants of between $100,000-$200,000. These two grants have easier application requirements and ca be made directly to the District.  Applications currently have a May 1 deadline, but Mayor Steve Young has requested that the deadline be extended to June 1.  ( links at bottom)

The Grants in further detail:

Seed Grant Size is $100-200,000.  Grant term up to 2 years and is open to 501c3 Non-profit, no Co-applicants.

Opportunity Grant size is $500,000-$5 million and the grant term is up to 3 years.  Lead applicants must partner with at least 1 Co-Applicant(s)

Catalyst Grant size is $10-$40 million.  Grant term is up to 5 years.  Exemption: no co-applicant required. This will be the City application .

In short, the Air District has exempted Benicia from the traditional Catalyst Grant application process and approval timelines—a major win for the city.

According to Appendix C of the revised Round 1 guidelines, the Air District has made the following key changes specifically for Benicia:
“Partnerships: The partnership requirements outlined in Section 4.1 of the grant guidelines have been waived. Co-applicants will not be required as an element for the Catalyst Grant in Benicia, though applications demonstrating diverse community support will be prioritized.

These guideline changes represent a significant acknowledgment by the Air District of the unique and severe economic impact the Valero refinery closure has had on Benicia. By modifying their rules dramatically in favor of the city, the Air District has created a streamlined pathway for Benicia to access critical funding resources during this unprecedented transition period.

The modifications demonstrate the District’s understanding that Benicia’s situation requires an exceptional response, removing bureaucratic barriers that could delay the city’s access to funds needed to address immediate economic challenges and begin building a sustainable post-refinery future.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Clearly these are not unrestricted funds and they cannot be spent on salary increases..  However, we believe these rule changes provide the City with a significantly more latitude in building a comprehensive grant request that covers some traditional and non-traditional General Fund  expenditures to help fill the loss of Valero Tax revenues.

Given this new understanding  of Benicia ‘s situation , Mayor Young and I do not feel we need to ask the community to bus over to Oakland on 1/28 to deliver public comment.

Links: Please copy and paste link or visit the Baaqmd website. 

Updated overarching guidelines: https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/community-health/cio/documents/lcbf-r1-guidelines-pdf.pdf?rev=b30a07a3fa744577b5eaead937b8b3f4&sc_lang=en

Updated Call for Projects – Benicia: https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/community-health/cio/documents/lcbf-r1–call-for-projects-benicia-and-surrounding-communities-pdf.pdf?rev=71b421ce010c4888975991286c2283a3&sc_lang=en

Terry Scott
Benicia City Councilmember


More on BenIndy…

Previous reports on Valero fines